BRRDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elkem ASA has a net margin of 10.56% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 5.87%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 14.69% beat Elkem ASA's return on equity of 2.22%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Elkem ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Borregaard ASA has higher upside potential than Elkem ASA, analysts believe Borregaard ASA is more attractive than Elkem ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of -0.004, which suggesting that the stock is 100.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elkem ASA has a beta of -0.204, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.44%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Elkem ASA offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 51.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Elkem ASA pays out 38.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are smaller than Elkem ASA quarterly revenues of $407M. Borregaard ASA's net income of $18.8M is lower than Elkem ASA's net income of $23.9M. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Elkem ASA's PE ratio is 21.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.66x versus 1.03x for Elkem ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of 10.56% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 3.66%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 14.69% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 78.28%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Borregaard ASA, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Borregaard ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of -0.004, which suggesting that the stock is 100.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.565, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.472%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 51.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Borregaard ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Borregaard ASA's net income of $18.8M is higher than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 42.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.66x versus 2.04x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norsk Hydro ASA has a net margin of 10.56% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 4.24%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 14.69% beat Norsk Hydro ASA's return on equity of 11.13%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norsk Hydro ASA has an analysts' consensus of $9.55 which suggests that it could grow by 11.19%. Given that Norsk Hydro ASA has higher upside potential than Borregaard ASA, analysts believe Norsk Hydro ASA is more attractive than Borregaard ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of -0.004, which suggesting that the stock is 100.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norsk Hydro ASA has a beta of 1.174, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.422%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Norsk Hydro ASA offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 51.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Norsk Hydro ASA pays out 56.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are smaller than Norsk Hydro ASA quarterly revenues of $5B. Borregaard ASA's net income of $18.8M is lower than Norsk Hydro ASA's net income of $212.8M. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Norsk Hydro ASA's PE ratio is 16.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.66x versus 0.83x for Norsk Hydro ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yara International ASA has a net margin of 10.56% compared to Borregaard ASA's net margin of 7.79%. Borregaard ASA's return on equity of 14.69% beat Yara International ASA's return on equity of 9.6%.

Borregaard ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yara International ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Borregaard ASA has higher upside potential than Yara International ASA, analysts believe Borregaard ASA is more attractive than Yara International ASA.

Borregaard ASA has a beta of -0.004, which suggesting that the stock is 100.425% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yara International ASA has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.874%.

Borregaard ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.05%. Yara International ASA offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Borregaard ASA pays 51.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Yara International ASA pays out 671.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Borregaard ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Yara International ASA's is not.

Borregaard ASA quarterly revenues are $178.2M, which are smaller than Yara International ASA quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Borregaard ASA's net income of $18.8M is lower than Yara International ASA's net income of $319.8M. Notably, Borregaard ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.36x while Yara International ASA's PE ratio is 14.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Borregaard ASA is 2.66x versus 0.73x for Yara International ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.