NHNCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Interactive Technologies has a net margin of 19.2% compared to NAVER's net margin of -4322307.69%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.56% beat Global Interactive Technologies's return on equity of -42.45%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Interactive Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NAVER has higher upside potential than Global Interactive Technologies, analysts believe NAVER is more attractive than Global Interactive Technologies.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Interactive Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Global Interactive Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Interactive Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Global Interactive Technologies quarterly revenues of $10. NAVER's net income of $395.5M is higher than Global Interactive Technologies's net income of -$491.7K. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while Global Interactive Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.25x versus 6.69x for Global Interactive Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GRAVITY has a net margin of 19.2% compared to NAVER's net margin of 17.44%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.56% beat GRAVITY's return on equity of 17.02%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GRAVITY has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NAVER has higher upside potential than GRAVITY, analysts believe NAVER is more attractive than GRAVITY.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GRAVITY has a beta of 1.325, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.49%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. GRAVITY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. GRAVITY pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than GRAVITY quarterly revenues of $94.7M. NAVER's net income of $395.5M is higher than GRAVITY's net income of $16.5M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while GRAVITY's PE ratio is 7.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.25x versus 1.22x for GRAVITY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KT has a net margin of 19.2% compared to NAVER's net margin of -9.47%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.56% beat KT's return on equity of 2.82%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KT has an analysts' consensus of $21.34 which suggests that it could grow by 10.45%. Given that KT has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe KT is more attractive than NAVER.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KT has a beta of 0.682, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.765%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. KT offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. KT pays out 189.7% of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but KT's is not.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than KT quarterly revenues of $4.7B. NAVER's net income of $395.5M is higher than KT's net income of -$444.6M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while KT's PE ratio is 24.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.25x versus 0.49x for KT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SK Telecom has a net margin of 19.2% compared to NAVER's net margin of 7.59%. NAVER's return on equity of 7.56% beat SK Telecom's return on equity of 10.51%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SK Telecom has an analysts' consensus of $27.54 which suggests that it could grow by 32.46%. Given that SK Telecom has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe SK Telecom is more attractive than NAVER.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SK Telecom has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.861%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. SK Telecom offers a yield of 6.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. NAVER pays 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SK Telecom pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than SK Telecom quarterly revenues of $3.2B. NAVER's net income of $395.5M is higher than SK Telecom's net income of $244.6M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.52x while SK Telecom's PE ratio is 8.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.25x versus 0.61x for SK Telecom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.