NHNCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Interactive Technologies has a net margin of 19.16% compared to NAVER's net margin of -4322307.69%. NAVER's return on equity of 6.76% beat Global Interactive Technologies's return on equity of -42.45%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Interactive Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NAVER has higher upside potential than Global Interactive Technologies, analysts believe NAVER is more attractive than Global Interactive Technologies.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Interactive Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Global Interactive Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NAVER pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Interactive Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Global Interactive Technologies quarterly revenues of $10. NAVER's net income of $383.8M is higher than Global Interactive Technologies's net income of -$491.7K. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Global Interactive Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.29x versus 25.19x for Global Interactive Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GRAVITY has a net margin of 19.16% compared to NAVER's net margin of 17.44%. NAVER's return on equity of 6.76% beat GRAVITY's return on equity of 17.02%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GRAVITY has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NAVER has higher upside potential than GRAVITY, analysts believe NAVER is more attractive than GRAVITY.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GRAVITY has a beta of 1.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.584%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. GRAVITY offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NAVER pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. GRAVITY pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than GRAVITY quarterly revenues of $94.7M. NAVER's net income of $383.8M is higher than GRAVITY's net income of $16.5M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while GRAVITY's PE ratio is 6.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.29x versus 1.12x for GRAVITY. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KT has a net margin of 19.16% compared to NAVER's net margin of 5.37%. NAVER's return on equity of 6.76% beat KT's return on equity of 6.12%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.89%. Given that KT has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe KT is more attractive than NAVER.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KT has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.725%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. KT offers a yield of 7.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. NAVER pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. KT pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than KT quarterly revenues of $4.9B. NAVER's net income of $383.8M is higher than KT's net income of $263.5M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while KT's PE ratio is 9.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.29x versus 0.40x for KT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SK Telecom has a net margin of 19.16% compared to NAVER's net margin of 5.93%. NAVER's return on equity of 6.76% beat SK Telecom's return on equity of 9.06%.

NAVER has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SK Telecom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.12%. Given that SK Telecom has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe SK Telecom is more attractive than NAVER.

NAVER has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SK Telecom has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.451%.

NAVER has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. SK Telecom offers a yield of 6.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. NAVER pays 6.16% of its earnings as a dividend. SK Telecom pays out 70.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NAVER quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than SK Telecom quarterly revenues of $3.3B. NAVER's net income of $383.8M is higher than SK Telecom's net income of $198.3M. Notably, NAVER's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while SK Telecom's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NAVER is 2.29x versus 0.62x for SK Telecom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.