GRVY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Interactive Technologies has a net margin of 17.44% compared to GRAVITY's net margin of -4322307.69%. GRAVITY's return on equity of 17.02% beat Global Interactive Technologies's return on equity of -42.45%.

GRAVITY has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global Interactive Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GRAVITY has higher upside potential than Global Interactive Technologies, analysts believe GRAVITY is more attractive than Global Interactive Technologies.

GRAVITY has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Interactive Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GRAVITY has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Interactive Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GRAVITY pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Interactive Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GRAVITY quarterly revenues are $94.7M, which are larger than Global Interactive Technologies quarterly revenues of $10. GRAVITY's net income of $16.5M is higher than Global Interactive Technologies's net income of -$491.7K. Notably, GRAVITY's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.34x while Global Interactive Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GRAVITY is 1.25x versus 6.69x for Global Interactive Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KT has a net margin of 17.44% compared to GRAVITY's net margin of 8.28%. GRAVITY's return on equity of 17.02% beat KT's return on equity of 3.48%.

GRAVITY has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KT has an analysts' consensus of $21.34 which suggests that it could grow by 11.08%. Given that KT has higher upside potential than GRAVITY, analysts believe KT is more attractive than GRAVITY.

GRAVITY has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KT has a beta of 0.682, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.765%.

GRAVITY has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KT offers a yield of 3.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. GRAVITY pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KT pays out 189.7% of its earnings as a dividend.

GRAVITY quarterly revenues are $94.7M, which are smaller than KT quarterly revenues of $4.7B. GRAVITY's net income of $16.5M is lower than KT's net income of $389.8M. Notably, GRAVITY's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.34x while KT's PE ratio is 19.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GRAVITY is 1.25x versus 0.25x for KT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NAVER has a net margin of 17.44% compared to GRAVITY's net margin of 19.2%. GRAVITY's return on equity of 17.02% beat NAVER's return on equity of 7.56%.

GRAVITY has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NAVER has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that GRAVITY has higher upside potential than NAVER, analysts believe GRAVITY is more attractive than NAVER.

GRAVITY has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NAVER has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GRAVITY has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NAVER offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. GRAVITY pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER pays out 6.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NAVER's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GRAVITY quarterly revenues are $94.7M, which are smaller than NAVER quarterly revenues of $2.1B. GRAVITY's net income of $16.5M is lower than NAVER's net income of $395.5M. Notably, GRAVITY's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.34x while NAVER's PE ratio is 12.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GRAVITY is 1.25x versus 2.25x for NAVER. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SK Telecom has a net margin of 17.44% compared to GRAVITY's net margin of 7.59%. GRAVITY's return on equity of 17.02% beat SK Telecom's return on equity of 10.51%.

GRAVITY has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SK Telecom has an analysts' consensus of $26.69 which suggests that it could grow by 33.45%. Given that SK Telecom has higher upside potential than GRAVITY, analysts believe SK Telecom is more attractive than GRAVITY.

GRAVITY has a beta of 1.325, which suggesting that the stock is 32.49% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SK Telecom has a beta of 0.721, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.861%.

GRAVITY has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SK Telecom offers a yield of 7.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. GRAVITY pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SK Telecom pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. SK Telecom's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GRAVITY quarterly revenues are $94.7M, which are smaller than SK Telecom quarterly revenues of $3.2B. GRAVITY's net income of $16.5M is lower than SK Telecom's net income of $244.6M. Notably, GRAVITY's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.34x while SK Telecom's PE ratio is 8.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GRAVITY is 1.25x versus 0.58x for SK Telecom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.