Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
72
MKKGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.68
Seasonality move
:
-0.08%
Day range:
$28.68 - $29.00
52-week range:
$24.32 - $31.80
Dividend yield:
1.74%
P/E ratio:
19.02x
P/S ratio:
2.65x
P/B ratio:
6.17x
Volume:
64.4K
Avg. volume:
113.5K
1-year change:
0.17%
Market cap:
$62.3B
Revenue:
$22.9B
EPS (TTM):
$1.51
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKKGY
Merck KGaA
|
$6.1B | $0.48 | 6.17% | 47.26% | $34.04 |
|
BAYRY
Bayer AG
|
$13.1B | $0.15 | 3.78% | 25.01% | $11.67 |
|
BNTX
BioNTech SE
|
$964.2M | -$0.07 | -24.04% | -86.85% | $138.33 |
|
CVAC
CureVac NV
|
$15.4M | -$0.11 | 0.04% | -32.36% | $5.31 |
|
IFRX
InflaRx NV
|
$30.8K | -$0.16 | -74.55% | -16.09% | $11.25 |
|
IMTX
Immatics NV
|
$10.9M | -$0.47 | -81.87% | -704.25% | $18.75 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKKGY
Merck KGaA
|
$28.68 | $34.04 | $62.3B | 19.02x | $0.50 | 1.74% | 2.65x |
|
BAYRY
Bayer AG
|
$10.82 | $11.67 | $42.5B | -- | $0.03 | 0.28% | 0.84x |
|
BNTX
BioNTech SE
|
$95.20 | $138.33 | $22.9B | 191.55x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.48x |
|
CVAC
CureVac NV
|
$4.52 | $5.31 | $1B | 6.33x | $0.00 | 0% | 12.56x |
|
IFRX
InflaRx NV
|
$1.01 | $11.25 | $68.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 312.07x |
|
IMTX
Immatics NV
|
$10.50 | $18.75 | $1.3B | 42.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 14.03x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKKGY
Merck KGaA
|
29.49% | 0.018 | 25.12% | 0.76x |
|
BAYRY
Bayer AG
|
57.27% | -0.093 | 142.34% | 0.55x |
|
BNTX
BioNTech SE
|
1.31% | 1.387 | 1.22% | 6.78x |
|
CVAC
CureVac NV
|
3.87% | 2.758 | 3.39% | 1.84x |
|
IFRX
InflaRx NV
|
2.1% | -0.265 | 1.26% | 2.34x |
|
IMTX
Immatics NV
|
3.78% | 1.667 | 1.86% | 6.97x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MKKGY
Merck KGaA
|
$3.8B | $1.4B | 7.45% | 10.11% | 22.9% | $579.8M |
|
BAYRY
Bayer AG
|
$6.3B | $655.6M | -0.4% | -0.91% | 5.81% | $616.1M |
|
BNTX
BioNTech SE
|
$1.6B | $743.4M | -2.96% | -3.01% | 41.89% | $785.5M |
|
CVAC
CureVac NV
|
$57.9M | -$11.6M | 19.52% | 20.55% | -18.33% | $31.6M |
|
IFRX
InflaRx NV
|
-$89.2K | -$11.7M | -80.95% | -82.01% | -42057.91% | -$11.4M |
|
IMTX
Immatics NV
|
-- | -$63.9M | -24.18% | -25.21% | -1053.82% | -$56.2M |
Merck KGaA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MKKGY or BAYRY?
Bayer AG has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Merck KGaA's net margin of -9.93%. Merck KGaA's return on equity of 10.11% beat Bayer AG's return on equity of -0.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKKGYMerck KGaA60.42% $0.48 $48.3B BAYRYBayer AG55.41% -$0.29 $81.5B -
What do Analysts Say About MKKGY or BAYRY?
Merck KGaA has a consensus price target of $34.04, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand Bayer AG has an analysts' consensus of $11.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.81%. Given that Merck KGaA has higher upside potential than Bayer AG, analysts believe Merck KGaA is more attractive than Bayer AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKKGYMerck KGaA1 0 0 BAYRYBayer AG1 2 0 -
Is MKKGY or BAYRY More Risky?
Merck KGaA has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bayer AG has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.443%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKKGY or BAYRY?
Merck KGaA has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Bayer AG offers a yield of 0.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Merck KGaA pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Bayer AG pays out 4.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKKGY or BAYRY?
Merck KGaA quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are smaller than Bayer AG quarterly revenues of $11.3B. Merck KGaA's net income of $1B is higher than Bayer AG's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Merck KGaA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while Bayer AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Merck KGaA is 2.65x versus 0.84x for Bayer AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKKGYMerck KGaA2.65x 19.02x $6.2B $1B BAYRYBayer AG0.84x -- $11.3B -$1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns MKKGY or BNTX?
BioNTech SE has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Merck KGaA's net margin of -1.89%. Merck KGaA's return on equity of 10.11% beat BioNTech SE's return on equity of -3.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKKGYMerck KGaA60.42% $0.48 $48.3B BNTXBioNTech SE90.24% -$0.14 $22B -
What do Analysts Say About MKKGY or BNTX?
Merck KGaA has a consensus price target of $34.04, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand BioNTech SE has an analysts' consensus of $138.33 which suggests that it could grow by 45.31%. Given that BioNTech SE has higher upside potential than Merck KGaA, analysts believe BioNTech SE is more attractive than Merck KGaA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKKGYMerck KGaA1 0 0 BNTXBioNTech SE14 5 0 -
Is MKKGY or BNTX More Risky?
Merck KGaA has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BioNTech SE has a beta of 1.393, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.311%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKKGY or BNTX?
Merck KGaA has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. BioNTech SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Merck KGaA pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. BioNTech SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Merck KGaA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKKGY or BNTX?
Merck KGaA quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than BioNTech SE quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Merck KGaA's net income of $1B is higher than BioNTech SE's net income of -$33.5M. Notably, Merck KGaA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while BioNTech SE's PE ratio is 191.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Merck KGaA is 2.65x versus 6.48x for BioNTech SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKKGYMerck KGaA2.65x 19.02x $6.2B $1B BNTXBioNTech SE6.48x 191.55x $1.8B -$33.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKKGY or CVAC?
CureVac NV has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Merck KGaA's net margin of -5832.47%. Merck KGaA's return on equity of 10.11% beat CureVac NV's return on equity of 20.55%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKKGYMerck KGaA60.42% $0.48 $48.3B CVACCureVac NV91.57% $1.41 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About MKKGY or CVAC?
Merck KGaA has a consensus price target of $34.04, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand CureVac NV has an analysts' consensus of $5.31 which suggests that it could grow by 17.77%. Given that Merck KGaA has higher upside potential than CureVac NV, analysts believe Merck KGaA is more attractive than CureVac NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKKGYMerck KGaA1 0 0 CVACCureVac NV1 3 0 -
Is MKKGY or CVAC More Risky?
Merck KGaA has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CureVac NV has a beta of 1.842, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.205%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKKGY or CVAC?
Merck KGaA has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. CureVac NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Merck KGaA pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. CureVac NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Merck KGaA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKKGY or CVAC?
Merck KGaA quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than CureVac NV quarterly revenues of $63.3M. Merck KGaA's net income of $1B is higher than CureVac NV's net income of $319.3M. Notably, Merck KGaA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while CureVac NV's PE ratio is 6.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Merck KGaA is 2.65x versus 12.56x for CureVac NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKKGYMerck KGaA2.65x 19.02x $6.2B $1B CVACCureVac NV12.56x 6.33x $63.3M $319.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKKGY or IFRX?
InflaRx NV has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Merck KGaA's net margin of -51538.49%. Merck KGaA's return on equity of 10.11% beat InflaRx NV's return on equity of -82.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKKGYMerck KGaA60.42% $0.48 $48.3B IFRXInflaRx NV-320.86% -$0.21 $54.4M -
What do Analysts Say About MKKGY or IFRX?
Merck KGaA has a consensus price target of $34.04, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand InflaRx NV has an analysts' consensus of $11.25 which suggests that it could grow by 1013.96%. Given that InflaRx NV has higher upside potential than Merck KGaA, analysts believe InflaRx NV is more attractive than Merck KGaA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKKGYMerck KGaA1 0 0 IFRXInflaRx NV5 2 0 -
Is MKKGY or IFRX More Risky?
Merck KGaA has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison InflaRx NV has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.312%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKKGY or IFRX?
Merck KGaA has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. InflaRx NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Merck KGaA pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. InflaRx NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Merck KGaA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKKGY or IFRX?
Merck KGaA quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than InflaRx NV quarterly revenues of $27.8K. Merck KGaA's net income of $1B is higher than InflaRx NV's net income of -$14.3M. Notably, Merck KGaA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while InflaRx NV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Merck KGaA is 2.65x versus 312.07x for InflaRx NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKKGYMerck KGaA2.65x 19.02x $6.2B $1B IFRXInflaRx NV312.07x -- $27.8K -$14.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MKKGY or IMTX?
Immatics NV has a net margin of 16.89% compared to Merck KGaA's net margin of -974.45%. Merck KGaA's return on equity of 10.11% beat Immatics NV's return on equity of -25.21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MKKGYMerck KGaA60.42% $0.48 $48.3B IMTXImmatics NV-- -$0.49 $508.8M -
What do Analysts Say About MKKGY or IMTX?
Merck KGaA has a consensus price target of $34.04, signalling upside risk potential of 18.69%. On the other hand Immatics NV has an analysts' consensus of $18.75 which suggests that it could grow by 78.57%. Given that Immatics NV has higher upside potential than Merck KGaA, analysts believe Immatics NV is more attractive than Merck KGaA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MKKGYMerck KGaA1 0 0 IMTXImmatics NV9 0 0 -
Is MKKGY or IMTX More Risky?
Merck KGaA has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.597% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immatics NV has a beta of 1.360, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.986%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MKKGY or IMTX?
Merck KGaA has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Immatics NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Merck KGaA pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Immatics NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Merck KGaA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MKKGY or IMTX?
Merck KGaA quarterly revenues are $6.2B, which are larger than Immatics NV quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Merck KGaA's net income of $1B is higher than Immatics NV's net income of -$59.1M. Notably, Merck KGaA's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.02x while Immatics NV's PE ratio is 42.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Merck KGaA is 2.65x versus 14.03x for Immatics NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MKKGYMerck KGaA2.65x 19.02x $6.2B $1B IMTXImmatics NV14.03x 42.21x $6.1M -$59.1M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.
Sell
50
NUTX alert for Jan 1
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is down 9.81% over the past day.
