MITEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Daiwa House Industry has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Mitsubishi Estate's net margin of 7.1%. Mitsubishi Estate's return on equity of 6.68% beat Daiwa House Industry's return on equity of 11.99%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Daiwa House Industry has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Estate has higher upside potential than Daiwa House Industry, analysts believe Mitsubishi Estate is more attractive than Daiwa House Industry.

Mitsubishi Estate has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Daiwa House Industry has a beta of 0.582, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.817%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Daiwa House Industry offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Mitsubishi Estate pays 29.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Daiwa House Industry pays out 29.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Estate quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are smaller than Daiwa House Industry quarterly revenues of $8.3B. Mitsubishi Estate's net income of $166.4M is lower than Daiwa House Industry's net income of $586.3M. Notably, Mitsubishi Estate's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while Daiwa House Industry's PE ratio is 8.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Estate is 1.69x versus 0.56x for Daiwa House Industry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lead Real Estate has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Mitsubishi Estate's net margin of --. Mitsubishi Estate's return on equity of 6.68% beat Lead Real Estate's return on equity of 16.92%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lead Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Estate has higher upside potential than Lead Real Estate, analysts believe Mitsubishi Estate is more attractive than Lead Real Estate.

Mitsubishi Estate has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lead Real Estate has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Lead Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Mitsubishi Estate pays 29.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Lead Real Estate pays out 3.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Estate quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Lead Real Estate quarterly revenues of --. Mitsubishi Estate's net income of $166.4M is higher than Lead Real Estate's net income of --. Notably, Mitsubishi Estate's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while Lead Real Estate's PE ratio is 6.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Estate is 1.69x versus 0.20x for Lead Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Realty & Development has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Mitsubishi Estate's net margin of 23.61%. Mitsubishi Estate's return on equity of 6.68% beat Sumitomo Realty & Development's return on equity of 9.19%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Realty & Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Estate has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Realty & Development, analysts believe Mitsubishi Estate is more attractive than Sumitomo Realty & Development.

Mitsubishi Estate has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Realty & Development has a beta of 0.407, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.284%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Sumitomo Realty & Development offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Mitsubishi Estate pays 29.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Realty & Development pays out 15.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Estate quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Sumitomo Realty & Development quarterly revenues of $2B. Mitsubishi Estate's net income of $166.4M is lower than Sumitomo Realty & Development's net income of $478.2M. Notably, Mitsubishi Estate's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while Sumitomo Realty & Development's PE ratio is 11.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Estate is 1.69x versus 2.17x for Sumitomo Realty & Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Tatemono has a net margin of 7.9% compared to Mitsubishi Estate's net margin of 4.69%. Mitsubishi Estate's return on equity of 6.68% beat Tokyo Tatemono's return on equity of 9.8%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Tatemono has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Estate has higher upside potential than Tokyo Tatemono, analysts believe Mitsubishi Estate is more attractive than Tokyo Tatemono.

Mitsubishi Estate has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.485% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Tatemono has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.362%.

Mitsubishi Estate has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Tokyo Tatemono offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Mitsubishi Estate pays 29.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Tatemono pays out 33.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Estate quarterly revenues are $2.1B, which are larger than Tokyo Tatemono quarterly revenues of $553.9M. Mitsubishi Estate's net income of $166.4M is higher than Tokyo Tatemono's net income of $26M. Notably, Mitsubishi Estate's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.87x while Tokyo Tatemono's PE ratio is 10.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Estate is 1.69x versus 1.04x for Tokyo Tatemono. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.