Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
45
MCHVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.15
Seasonality move
:
-12.98%
Day range:
$2.15 - $2.15
52-week range:
$1.05 - $2.20
Dividend yield:
3.36%
P/E ratio:
14.85x
P/S ratio:
3.59x
P/B ratio:
114.60x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
330
1-year change:
104.76%
Market cap:
$8.2B
Revenue:
$2.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.15
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCHVF
MGM China Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.1B | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$3.1B | $0.62 | 14.11% | 65.83% | $65.91 |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
$4.2B | $0.30 | 1.61% | -4.16% | $42.44 |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $0.09 | 8.72% | 42.63% | $11.00 |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
$1.8B | $1.32 | -0.45% | -36.6% | $141.17 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCHVF
MGM China Holdings Ltd.
|
$2.15 | -- | $8.2B | 14.85x | $0.04 | 3.36% | 3.59x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$66.25 | $65.91 | $44.8B | 29.90x | $0.25 | 1.51% | 3.80x |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
$36.07 | $42.44 | $9.9B | 226.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.59x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$8.78 | $11.00 | $3.4B | 33.40x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.71x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
$3.36 | -- | $647.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.94x |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
$125.51 | $141.17 | $13B | 27.68x | $0.25 | 0.8% | 1.86x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCHVF
MGM China Holdings Ltd.
|
97.75% | -1.990 | -- | 0.70x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
90.94% | 1.626 | 42.9% | 0.88x |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
92.18% | 0.991 | 308.72% | 1.01x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
120.74% | 2.067 | 193.76% | 1.00x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
79.17% | 0.847 | 257.64% | 0.66x |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
103.13% | 1.406 | 97.06% | 1.64x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MCHVF
MGM China Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 19.74% | -- | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
|
$1.3B | $794M | 10.36% | 64.69% | 23.84% | $886M |
|
MGM
MGM Resorts International
|
$1.6B | $219.4M | 1.06% | 10.22% | 5.16% | $475.1M |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$375.8M | $192.2M | 0.91% | -- | 14.66% | -- |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
$70.4M | $24M | -2.6% | -11.58% | 13.12% | -- |
|
WYNN
Wynn Resorts Ltd.
|
$603.5M | $317.8M | 5.37% | -- | 17.33% | $171.7M |
MGM China Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MCHVF or LVS?
Las Vegas Sands Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 14.74%. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s return on equity of 64.69%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3B LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.38.13% $0.61 $17.6B -
What do Analysts Say About MCHVF or LVS?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $65.91 which suggests that it could fall by -0.6%. Given that Las Vegas Sands Corp. has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Las Vegas Sands Corp. is more attractive than MGM China Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.12 6 0 -
Is MCHVF or LVS More Risky?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 136.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands Corp. has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCHVF or LVS?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Las Vegas Sands Corp. offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGM China Holdings Ltd. pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands Corp. pays out 40.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCHVF or LVS?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Las Vegas Sands Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.3B. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s net income of $491M. Notably, MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.85x while Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s PE ratio is 29.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings Ltd. is 3.59x versus 3.80x for Las Vegas Sands Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.3.59x 14.85x -- -- LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.3.80x 29.90x $3.3B $491M
-
Which has Higher Returns MCHVF or MGM?
MGM Resorts International has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -4.86%. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat MGM Resorts International's return on equity of 10.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3B MGMMGM Resorts International37.29% -$1.05 $35B -
What do Analysts Say About MCHVF or MGM?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MGM Resorts International has an analysts' consensus of $42.44 which suggests that it could grow by 17.67%. Given that MGM Resorts International has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings Ltd., analysts believe MGM Resorts International is more attractive than MGM China Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 MGMMGM Resorts International10 8 2 -
Is MCHVF or MGM More Risky?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 136.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGM Resorts International has a beta of 1.477, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.71%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCHVF or MGM?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. MGM Resorts International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM China Holdings Ltd. pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. MGM Resorts International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCHVF or MGM?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MGM Resorts International quarterly revenues of $4.3B. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MGM Resorts International's net income of -$206.7M. Notably, MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.85x while MGM Resorts International's PE ratio is 226.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings Ltd. is 3.59x versus 0.59x for MGM Resorts International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.3.59x 14.85x -- -- MGMMGM Resorts International0.59x 226.43x $4.3B -$206.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MCHVF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 4.74%. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3B MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.28.66% $0.19 $6.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MCHVF or MLCO?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.33%. Given that Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. is more attractive than MGM China Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.6 5 0 -
Is MCHVF or MLCO More Risky?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 136.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.922%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCHVF or MLCO?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM China Holdings Ltd. pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCHVF or MLCO?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.85x while Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 33.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings Ltd. is 3.59x versus 0.71x for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.3.59x 14.85x -- -- MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.0.71x 33.40x $1.3B $62.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns MCHVF or MSC?
Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -11.13%. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3B MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.38.56% -$0.10 $2.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MCHVF or MSC?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 227.38%. Given that Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Studio City International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than MGM China Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is MCHVF or MSC More Risky?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 136.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.058%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCHVF or MSC?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Studio City International Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MGM China Holdings Ltd. pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Studio City International Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCHVF or MSC?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Studio City International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $182.5M. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$20.3M. Notably, MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.85x while Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings Ltd. is 3.59x versus 0.94x for Studio City International Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.3.59x 14.85x -- -- MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.0.94x -- $182.5M -$20.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MCHVF or WYNN?
Wynn Resorts Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 7%. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Wynn Resorts Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.-- -- $3B WYNNWynn Resorts Ltd.32.91% $0.85 $11.1B -
What do Analysts Say About MCHVF or WYNN?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wynn Resorts Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $141.17 which suggests that it could grow by 12.47%. Given that Wynn Resorts Ltd. has higher upside potential than MGM China Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Wynn Resorts Ltd. is more attractive than MGM China Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 WYNNWynn Resorts Ltd.15 1 0 -
Is MCHVF or WYNN More Risky?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.362, which suggesting that the stock is 136.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wynn Resorts Ltd. has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.673%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MCHVF or WYNN?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Wynn Resorts Ltd. offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGM China Holdings Ltd. pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Wynn Resorts Ltd. pays out 22.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MCHVF or WYNN?
MGM China Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wynn Resorts Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Wynn Resorts Ltd.'s net income of $128.4M. Notably, MGM China Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.85x while Wynn Resorts Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGM China Holdings Ltd. is 3.59x versus 1.86x for Wynn Resorts Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MCHVFMGM China Holdings Ltd.3.59x 14.85x -- -- WYNNWynn Resorts Ltd.1.86x 27.68x $1.8B $128.4M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
