Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
75
LYSCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.10
Seasonality move
:
19.94%
Day range:
$11.00 - $11.20
52-week range:
$4.05 - $16.20
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
1,520.00x
P/S ratio:
28.98x
P/B ratio:
5.58x
Volume:
24.7K
Avg. volume:
67.6K
1-year change:
146.67%
Market cap:
$11B
Revenue:
$360.4M
EPS (TTM):
$0.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LYSCF
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LYSCF
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
|
$11.10 | -- | $11B | 1,520.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 28.98x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.25x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $29.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 13.60x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.52 | -- | $581.8M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.06 | -- | $20.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LYSCF
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
|
7.72% | 0.072 | -- | 2.37x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
38.76% | -0.121 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -3.351 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -0.421 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LYSCF
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.08% | 2.25% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LYSCF or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.25% beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.-- -- $1.6B FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About LYSCF or FTZZF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LYSCF or FTZZF More Risky?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.893, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 189.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LYSCF or FTZZF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LYSCF or FTZZF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,520.00x while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is 28.98x versus 1.25x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.28.98x 1,520.00x -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.25x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LYSCF or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.25% beat Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.-- -- $1.6B HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About LYSCF or HMIFF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals Ltd., analysts believe Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is more attractive than Harvest Minerals Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LYSCF or HMIFF More Risky?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LYSCF or HMIFF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LYSCF or HMIFF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,520.00x while Harvest Minerals Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is 28.98x versus 13.60x for Harvest Minerals Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.28.98x 1,520.00x -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals Ltd.13.60x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LYSCF or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.25% beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.-- -- $1.6B NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About LYSCF or NUFMF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LYSCF or NUFMF More Risky?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.256, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 125.57%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LYSCF or NUFMF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LYSCF or NUFMF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,520.00x while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is 28.98x versus 0.26x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.28.98x 1,520.00x -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.26x 101.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LYSCF or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.25% beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.-- -- $1.6B SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LYSCF or SBMSF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is LYSCF or SBMSF More Risky?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a beta of 0.943, which suggesting that the stock is 5.667% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.229%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LYSCF or SBMSF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LYSCF or SBMSF?
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Lynas Rare Earths Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 1,520.00x while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. is 28.98x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LYSCFLynas Rare Earths Ltd.28.98x 1,520.00x -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 21
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is up 34.37% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 21
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 24.98% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 21
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is up 23.81% over the past day.
