Financhill
Buy
56

LCOMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$12.15
Seasonality move :
-0.11%
Day range:
$12.15 - $12.15
52-week range:
$12.15 - $12.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
41.63x
P/S ratio:
15.22x
P/B ratio:
2.80x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$96.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.01

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
GMGSF
Goodman Group
-- -- -- -- --
LLESF
Lendlease Group
-- -- -- -- --
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
-- -- -- -- --
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
-- -- -- -- --
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
$12.15 -- $1.5B 41.63x $0.03 0% 15.22x
GMGSF
Goodman Group
$18.35 -- $37.5B 33.60x $0.10 0% 24.35x
LLESF
Lendlease Group
$3.35 -- $2.3B 15.85x $0.04 0% 0.45x
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
$1.78 -- $2.5B 16.50x $0.04 0% 9.90x
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
$0.04 -- $44M -- $0.00 0% --
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
$0.0500 -- $3.9M -- $0.00 0% 39,581.14x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
29.84% 0.000 -- 0.02x
GMGSF
Goodman Group
23.79% 2.592 -- 1.02x
LLESF
Lendlease Group
47.6% 0.232 -- 0.58x
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
84.15% 0.920 -- 0.13x
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
-- 0.000 -- --
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
-- -21.630 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
-- -- 4.59% 7.05% -- --
GMGSF
Goodman Group
-- -- 4.12% 5.09% -- --
LLESF
Lendlease Group
-- -- -13.52% -24.37% -- --
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
-- -- 4.55% 6.42% -- --
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
-- -- -- -- -- --
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
-- -- -- -- -- --

Lifestyle Communities Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or GMGSF?

    Goodman Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Goodman Group's return on equity of 5.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    -- -- $751.8M
    GMGSF
    Goodman Group
    -- -- $15.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or GMGSF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goodman Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Goodman Group, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Goodman Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    0 0 0
    GMGSF
    Goodman Group
    0 0 0
  • Is LCOMF or GMGSF More Risky?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodman Group has a beta of 1.520, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.021%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or GMGSF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodman Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodman Group pays out 35.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or GMGSF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goodman Group quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Goodman Group's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Goodman Group's PE ratio is 33.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 24.35x for Goodman Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    15.22x 41.63x -- --
    GMGSF
    Goodman Group
    24.35x 33.60x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or LLESF?

    Lendlease Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Lendlease Group's return on equity of -24.37%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    -- -- $751.8M
    LLESF
    Lendlease Group
    -- -- $6B
  • What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or LLESF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lendlease Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lendlease Group, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Lendlease Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    0 0 0
    LLESF
    Lendlease Group
    0 0 0
  • Is LCOMF or LLESF More Risky?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendlease Group has a beta of 0.008, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.151%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or LLESF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendlease Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendlease Group pays out 69.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or LLESF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lendlease Group quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Lendlease Group's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Lendlease Group's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 0.45x for Lendlease Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    15.22x 41.63x -- --
    LLESF
    Lendlease Group
    0.45x 15.85x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or NTSGF?

    National Storage REIT has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat National Storage REIT's return on equity of 6.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    -- -- $751.8M
    NTSGF
    National Storage REIT
    -- -- $3.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or NTSGF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand National Storage REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than National Storage REIT, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than National Storage REIT.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    0 0 0
    NTSGF
    National Storage REIT
    0 0 0
  • Is LCOMF or NTSGF More Risky?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Storage REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or NTSGF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Storage REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. National Storage REIT pays out 65.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or NTSGF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than National Storage REIT quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than National Storage REIT's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while National Storage REIT's PE ratio is 16.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 9.90x for National Storage REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    15.22x 41.63x -- --
    NTSGF
    National Storage REIT
    9.90x 16.50x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or OPNNF?

    Openn Negotiation has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Openn Negotiation's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    -- -- $751.8M
    OPNNF
    Openn Negotiation
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or OPNNF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Openn Negotiation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Openn Negotiation, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Openn Negotiation.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    0 0 0
    OPNNF
    Openn Negotiation
    0 0 0
  • Is LCOMF or OPNNF More Risky?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openn Negotiation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or OPNNF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openn Negotiation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Openn Negotiation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or OPNNF?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Openn Negotiation quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Openn Negotiation's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Openn Negotiation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus -- for Openn Negotiation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    15.22x 41.63x -- --
    OPNNF
    Openn Negotiation
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or RGSG?

    Resources Global Services Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Resources Global Services Group's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    -- -- $751.8M
    RGSG
    Resources Global Services Group
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or RGSG?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Resources Global Services Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Resources Global Services Group, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Resources Global Services Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    0 0 0
    RGSG
    Resources Global Services Group
    0 0 0
  • Is LCOMF or RGSG More Risky?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Global Services Group has a beta of -7.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 852.178%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or RGSG?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Global Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Global Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or RGSG?

    Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Resources Global Services Group quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Resources Global Services Group's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Resources Global Services Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 39,581.14x for Resources Global Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    LCOMF
    Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
    15.22x 41.63x -- --
    RGSG
    Resources Global Services Group
    39,581.14x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?

Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…

Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?

Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 67.56% over the past day.

Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.88% over the past day.

Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8

Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.27% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock