Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
59
LCOMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.15
Seasonality move
:
-0.11%
Day range:
$12.15 - $12.15
52-week range:
$12.15 - $12.15
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
41.63x
P/S ratio:
15.22x
P/B ratio:
2.80x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$96.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.01
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LLESY
Lendlease Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
$12.15 | -- | $1.5B | 41.63x | $0.03 | 0% | 15.22x |
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
$19.21 | -- | $39.3B | 35.18x | $0.10 | 0% | 25.49x |
|
LLESY
Lendlease Group
|
$3.00 | -- | $2.1B | 14.19x | $0.11 | 4.95% | 0.40x |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
$1.87 | -- | $2.6B | 17.33x | $0.04 | 0% | 10.40x |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
$0.04 | -- | $44M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
$0.0500 | -- | $3.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 39,581.14x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
29.84% | 0.000 | -- | 0.02x |
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
23.79% | 2.592 | -- | 1.02x |
|
LLESY
Lendlease Group
|
47.6% | 1.255 | -- | 0.58x |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
84.15% | 0.920 | -- | 0.13x |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
-- | -21.630 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.59% | 7.05% | -- | -- |
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
-- | -- | 4.12% | 5.09% | -- | -- |
|
LLESY
Lendlease Group
|
-- | -- | -13.52% | -24.37% | -- | -- |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
-- | -- | 4.55% | 6.42% | -- | -- |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or GMGSF?
Goodman Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Goodman Group's return on equity of 5.09%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.-- -- $751.8M GMGSFGoodman Group-- -- $15.4B -
What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or GMGSF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Goodman Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Goodman Group, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Goodman Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.0 0 0 GMGSFGoodman Group0 0 0 -
Is LCOMF or GMGSF More Risky?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodman Group has a beta of 1.520, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.021%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or GMGSF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodman Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodman Group pays out 35.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or GMGSF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Goodman Group quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Goodman Group's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Goodman Group's PE ratio is 35.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 25.49x for Goodman Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.15.22x 41.63x -- -- GMGSFGoodman Group25.49x 35.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or LLESY?
Lendlease Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Lendlease Group's return on equity of -24.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.-- -- $751.8M LLESYLendlease Group-- -- $6B -
What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or LLESY?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lendlease Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Lendlease Group, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Lendlease Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.0 0 0 LLESYLendlease Group0 0 0 -
Is LCOMF or LLESY More Risky?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendlease Group has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or LLESY?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendlease Group offers a yield of 4.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendlease Group pays out 53.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or LLESY?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lendlease Group quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Lendlease Group's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Lendlease Group's PE ratio is 14.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 0.40x for Lendlease Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.15.22x 41.63x -- -- LLESYLendlease Group0.40x 14.19x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or NTSGF?
National Storage REIT has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat National Storage REIT's return on equity of 6.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.-- -- $751.8M NTSGFNational Storage REIT-- -- $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or NTSGF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand National Storage REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than National Storage REIT, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than National Storage REIT.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.0 0 0 NTSGFNational Storage REIT0 0 0 -
Is LCOMF or NTSGF More Risky?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Storage REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or NTSGF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Storage REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. National Storage REIT pays out 65.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or NTSGF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than National Storage REIT quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than National Storage REIT's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while National Storage REIT's PE ratio is 17.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 10.40x for National Storage REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.15.22x 41.63x -- -- NTSGFNational Storage REIT10.40x 17.33x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or OPNNF?
Openn Negotiation has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Openn Negotiation's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.-- -- $751.8M OPNNFOpenn Negotiation-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or OPNNF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Openn Negotiation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Openn Negotiation, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Openn Negotiation.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.0 0 0 OPNNFOpenn Negotiation0 0 0 -
Is LCOMF or OPNNF More Risky?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openn Negotiation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or OPNNF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openn Negotiation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Openn Negotiation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or OPNNF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Openn Negotiation quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Openn Negotiation's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Openn Negotiation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus -- for Openn Negotiation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.15.22x 41.63x -- -- OPNNFOpenn Negotiation-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LCOMF or RGSG?
Resources Global Services Group has a net margin of -- compared to Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net margin of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05% beat Resources Global Services Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.-- -- $751.8M RGSGResources Global Services Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LCOMF or RGSG?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Resources Global Services Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has higher upside potential than Resources Global Services Group, analysts believe Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is more attractive than Resources Global Services Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.0 0 0 RGSGResources Global Services Group0 0 0 -
Is LCOMF or RGSG More Risky?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 82.332% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Global Services Group has a beta of -7.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 852.178%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LCOMF or RGSG?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Global Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Global Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LCOMF or RGSG?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Resources Global Services Group quarterly revenues of --. Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Resources Global Services Group's net income of --. Notably, Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.63x while Resources Global Services Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lifestyle Communities Ltd. is 15.22x versus 39,581.14x for Resources Global Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.15.22x 41.63x -- -- RGSGResources Global Services Group39,581.14x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
