Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
55
GMGSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.35
Seasonality move
:
-1.21%
Day range:
$18.35 - $18.35
52-week range:
$14.84 - $23.92
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
33.60x
P/S ratio:
24.35x
P/B ratio:
3.86x
Volume:
7.2K
Avg. volume:
526
1-year change:
-17.53%
Market cap:
$37.5B
Revenue:
$1.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.55
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LLESF
Lendlease Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
$18.35 | -- | $37.5B | 33.60x | $0.10 | 0% | 24.35x |
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
$12.15 | -- | $1.5B | 41.63x | $0.03 | 0% | 15.22x |
|
LLESF
Lendlease Group
|
$3.35 | -- | $2.3B | 15.85x | $0.04 | 0% | 0.45x |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
$1.78 | -- | $2.5B | 16.50x | $0.04 | 0% | 9.90x |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
$0.04 | -- | $44M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
$0.0500 | -- | $3.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 39,581.14x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
23.79% | 2.592 | -- | 1.02x |
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
29.84% | 0.000 | -- | 0.02x |
|
LLESF
Lendlease Group
|
47.6% | 0.232 | -- | 0.58x |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
84.15% | 0.920 | -- | 0.13x |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
-- | -21.630 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GMGSF
Goodman Group
|
-- | -- | 4.12% | 5.09% | -- | -- |
|
LCOMF
Lifestyle Communities Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.59% | 7.05% | -- | -- |
|
LLESF
Lendlease Group
|
-- | -- | -13.52% | -24.37% | -- | -- |
|
NTSGF
National Storage REIT
|
-- | -- | 4.55% | 6.42% | -- | -- |
|
OPNNF
Openn Negotiation
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RGSG
Resources Global Services Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Goodman Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GMGSF or LCOMF?
Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Goodman Group's net margin of --. Goodman Group's return on equity of 5.09% beat Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMGSFGoodman Group-- -- $15.4B LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.-- -- $751.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GMGSF or LCOMF?
Goodman Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goodman Group has higher upside potential than Lifestyle Communities Ltd., analysts believe Goodman Group is more attractive than Lifestyle Communities Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMGSFGoodman Group0 0 0 LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GMGSF or LCOMF More Risky?
Goodman Group has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lifestyle Communities Ltd. has a beta of 0.177, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.332%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMGSF or LCOMF?
Goodman Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Goodman Group pays 35.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lifestyle Communities Ltd. pays out 3.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMGSF or LCOMF?
Goodman Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lifestyle Communities Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Goodman Group's net income of -- is lower than Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Goodman Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.60x while Lifestyle Communities Ltd.'s PE ratio is 41.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodman Group is 24.35x versus 15.22x for Lifestyle Communities Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMGSFGoodman Group24.35x 33.60x -- -- LCOMFLifestyle Communities Ltd.15.22x 41.63x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMGSF or LLESF?
Lendlease Group has a net margin of -- compared to Goodman Group's net margin of --. Goodman Group's return on equity of 5.09% beat Lendlease Group's return on equity of -24.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMGSFGoodman Group-- -- $15.4B LLESFLendlease Group-- -- $6B -
What do Analysts Say About GMGSF or LLESF?
Goodman Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lendlease Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goodman Group has higher upside potential than Lendlease Group, analysts believe Goodman Group is more attractive than Lendlease Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMGSFGoodman Group0 0 0 LLESFLendlease Group0 0 0 -
Is GMGSF or LLESF More Risky?
Goodman Group has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lendlease Group has a beta of 0.008, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.151%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMGSF or LLESF?
Goodman Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lendlease Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Goodman Group pays 35.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Lendlease Group pays out 69.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMGSF or LLESF?
Goodman Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lendlease Group quarterly revenues of --. Goodman Group's net income of -- is lower than Lendlease Group's net income of --. Notably, Goodman Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.60x while Lendlease Group's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodman Group is 24.35x versus 0.45x for Lendlease Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMGSFGoodman Group24.35x 33.60x -- -- LLESFLendlease Group0.45x 15.85x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMGSF or NTSGF?
National Storage REIT has a net margin of -- compared to Goodman Group's net margin of --. Goodman Group's return on equity of 5.09% beat National Storage REIT's return on equity of 6.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMGSFGoodman Group-- -- $15.4B NTSGFNational Storage REIT-- -- $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About GMGSF or NTSGF?
Goodman Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand National Storage REIT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goodman Group has higher upside potential than National Storage REIT, analysts believe Goodman Group is more attractive than National Storage REIT.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMGSFGoodman Group0 0 0 NTSGFNational Storage REIT0 0 0 -
Is GMGSF or NTSGF More Risky?
Goodman Group has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison National Storage REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMGSF or NTSGF?
Goodman Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. National Storage REIT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Goodman Group pays 35.12% of its earnings as a dividend. National Storage REIT pays out 65.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMGSF or NTSGF?
Goodman Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than National Storage REIT quarterly revenues of --. Goodman Group's net income of -- is lower than National Storage REIT's net income of --. Notably, Goodman Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.60x while National Storage REIT's PE ratio is 16.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodman Group is 24.35x versus 9.90x for National Storage REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMGSFGoodman Group24.35x 33.60x -- -- NTSGFNational Storage REIT9.90x 16.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMGSF or OPNNF?
Openn Negotiation has a net margin of -- compared to Goodman Group's net margin of --. Goodman Group's return on equity of 5.09% beat Openn Negotiation's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMGSFGoodman Group-- -- $15.4B OPNNFOpenn Negotiation-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMGSF or OPNNF?
Goodman Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Openn Negotiation has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goodman Group has higher upside potential than Openn Negotiation, analysts believe Goodman Group is more attractive than Openn Negotiation.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMGSFGoodman Group0 0 0 OPNNFOpenn Negotiation0 0 0 -
Is GMGSF or OPNNF More Risky?
Goodman Group has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Openn Negotiation has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMGSF or OPNNF?
Goodman Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Openn Negotiation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goodman Group pays 35.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Openn Negotiation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodman Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMGSF or OPNNF?
Goodman Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Openn Negotiation quarterly revenues of --. Goodman Group's net income of -- is lower than Openn Negotiation's net income of --. Notably, Goodman Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.60x while Openn Negotiation's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodman Group is 24.35x versus -- for Openn Negotiation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMGSFGoodman Group24.35x 33.60x -- -- OPNNFOpenn Negotiation-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GMGSF or RGSG?
Resources Global Services Group has a net margin of -- compared to Goodman Group's net margin of --. Goodman Group's return on equity of 5.09% beat Resources Global Services Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GMGSFGoodman Group-- -- $15.4B RGSGResources Global Services Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GMGSF or RGSG?
Goodman Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Resources Global Services Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Goodman Group has higher upside potential than Resources Global Services Group, analysts believe Goodman Group is more attractive than Resources Global Services Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GMGSFGoodman Group0 0 0 RGSGResources Global Services Group0 0 0 -
Is GMGSF or RGSG More Risky?
Goodman Group has a beta of 1.520, which suggesting that the stock is 52.021% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Resources Global Services Group has a beta of -7.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 852.178%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GMGSF or RGSG?
Goodman Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Resources Global Services Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Goodman Group pays 35.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Resources Global Services Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodman Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GMGSF or RGSG?
Goodman Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Resources Global Services Group quarterly revenues of --. Goodman Group's net income of -- is lower than Resources Global Services Group's net income of --. Notably, Goodman Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.60x while Resources Global Services Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Goodman Group is 24.35x versus 39,581.14x for Resources Global Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GMGSFGoodman Group24.35x 33.60x -- -- RGSGResources Global Services Group39,581.14x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 67.56% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.88% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.27% over the past day.
