JUMSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Birks Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Jumbo SA's net margin of --. Jumbo SA's return on equity of 24.02% beat Birks Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Jumbo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Birks Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jumbo SA has higher upside potential than Birks Group, Inc., analysts believe Jumbo SA is more attractive than Birks Group, Inc..

Jumbo SA has a beta of -0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 117.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Birks Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.514%.

Jumbo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Birks Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jumbo SA pays 21.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Birks Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jumbo SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jumbo SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Birks Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Jumbo SA's net income of -- is lower than Birks Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Jumbo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Birks Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jumbo SA is 2.88x versus 0.13x for Birks Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA has a net margin of -- compared to Jumbo SA's net margin of 39.75%. Jumbo SA's return on equity of 24.02% beat Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA's return on equity of 93.99%.

Jumbo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jumbo SA has higher upside potential than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA, analysts believe Jumbo SA is more attractive than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA.

Jumbo SA has a beta of -0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 117.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.925%.

Jumbo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA offers a yield of 6.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Jumbo SA pays 21.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA pays out 86.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jumbo SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA quarterly revenues of $378.4M. Jumbo SA's net income of -- is lower than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA's net income of $150.4M. Notably, Jumbo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA's PE ratio is 14.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jumbo SA is 2.88x versus 5.30x for Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bally’s Intralot SA has a net margin of -- compared to Jumbo SA's net margin of -2.34%. Jumbo SA's return on equity of 24.02% beat Bally’s Intralot SA's return on equity of 8.8%.

Jumbo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bally’s Intralot SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jumbo SA has higher upside potential than Bally’s Intralot SA, analysts believe Jumbo SA is more attractive than Bally’s Intralot SA.

Jumbo SA has a beta of -0.177, which suggesting that the stock is 117.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bally’s Intralot SA has a beta of 0.039, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.132%.

Jumbo SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Bally’s Intralot SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jumbo SA pays 21.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Bally’s Intralot SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jumbo SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Jumbo SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bally’s Intralot SA quarterly revenues of $87M. Jumbo SA's net income of -- is lower than Bally’s Intralot SA's net income of -$2M. Notably, Jumbo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.87x while Bally’s Intralot SA's PE ratio is 2,750.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jumbo SA is 2.88x versus 1.67x for Bally’s Intralot SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.