Financhill
Sell
33

IRLTF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.10
Seasonality move :
4.48%
Day range:
$1.10 - $1.10
52-week range:
$0.49 - $1.10
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
2,750.00x
P/S ratio:
1.67x
P/B ratio:
77.10x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
124.49%
Market cap:
$2.1B
Revenue:
$407.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.01

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
IRLTF
INTRALOT SA
-- -- -- -- --
EIHDF
Evoke Plc
-- -- -- -- --
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment Plc
$3.8B $0.50 33.35% 361.8% $303.26
GMVHY
Entain Plc
-- -- -- -- --
GOFPY
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
-- -- -- -- --
JUMSY
Jumbo SA
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
IRLTF
INTRALOT SA
$1.10 -- $2.1B 2,750.00x $0.00 0% 1.67x
EIHDF
Evoke Plc
$0.30 -- $136.3M -- $0.00 0% 0.06x
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment Plc
$208.50 $303.26 $36.5B 99.01x $0.00 0% 2.41x
GMVHY
Entain Plc
$10.03 -- $6.4B -- $0.13 2.51% 0.96x
GOFPY
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
$10.73 -- $7.7B 14.08x $0.29 6.95% 5.32x
JUMSY
Jumbo SA
$33.26 -- $4.5B 13.14x $0.59 1.78% 3.49x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
IRLTF
INTRALOT SA
98.24% 1.582 214.43% 3.41x
EIHDF
Evoke Plc
103.45% 1.750 -- 0.58x
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment Plc
57.84% 1.498 27.97% 0.79x
GMVHY
Entain Plc
70.14% 2.607 -- 0.59x
GOFPY
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
76.4% -0.618 13.39% 0.65x
JUMSY
Jumbo SA
0.01% 0.057 -- 1.49x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
IRLTF
INTRALOT SA
$30.3M $5.3M 0.68% 8.8% 6.11% $1.7M
EIHDF
Evoke Plc
-- -- -9.65% -296.68% -- --
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment Plc
$1.6B -$54M -1.27% -2.27% -1.42% $28M
GMVHY
Entain Plc
-- -- -7.58% -18.48% -- --
GOFPY
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
$209.7M $206.3M 39.38% 93.99% 54.51% $223.2M
JUMSY
Jumbo SA
-- -- 24.02% 24.02% -- --

INTRALOT SA vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns IRLTF or EIHDF?

    Evoke Plc has a net margin of -2.34% compared to INTRALOT SA's net margin of --. INTRALOT SA's return on equity of 8.8% beat Evoke Plc's return on equity of -296.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    34.84% -$0.01 $1.5B
    EIHDF
    Evoke Plc
    -- -- $2.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About IRLTF or EIHDF?

    INTRALOT SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evoke Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that INTRALOT SA has higher upside potential than Evoke Plc, analysts believe INTRALOT SA is more attractive than Evoke Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    0 0 0
    EIHDF
    Evoke Plc
    0 0 0
  • Is IRLTF or EIHDF More Risky?

    INTRALOT SA has a beta of 0.039, which suggesting that the stock is 96.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evoke Plc has a beta of 1.479, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.872%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IRLTF or EIHDF?

    INTRALOT SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evoke Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. INTRALOT SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evoke Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IRLTF or EIHDF?

    INTRALOT SA quarterly revenues are $87M, which are larger than Evoke Plc quarterly revenues of --. INTRALOT SA's net income of -$2M is higher than Evoke Plc's net income of --. Notably, INTRALOT SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,750.00x while Evoke Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for INTRALOT SA is 1.67x versus 0.06x for Evoke Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    1.67x 2,750.00x $87M -$2M
    EIHDF
    Evoke Plc
    0.06x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns IRLTF or FLUT?

    Flutter Entertainment Plc has a net margin of -2.34% compared to INTRALOT SA's net margin of -20.8%. INTRALOT SA's return on equity of 8.8% beat Flutter Entertainment Plc's return on equity of -2.27%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    34.84% -$0.01 $1.5B
    FLUT
    Flutter Entertainment Plc
    42.86% -$3.92 $22.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About IRLTF or FLUT?

    INTRALOT SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flutter Entertainment Plc has an analysts' consensus of $303.26 which suggests that it could grow by 45.45%. Given that Flutter Entertainment Plc has higher upside potential than INTRALOT SA, analysts believe Flutter Entertainment Plc is more attractive than INTRALOT SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    0 0 0
    FLUT
    Flutter Entertainment Plc
    19 2 0
  • Is IRLTF or FLUT More Risky?

    INTRALOT SA has a beta of 0.039, which suggesting that the stock is 96.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flutter Entertainment Plc has a beta of 1.183, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.276%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IRLTF or FLUT?

    INTRALOT SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flutter Entertainment Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. INTRALOT SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flutter Entertainment Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IRLTF or FLUT?

    INTRALOT SA quarterly revenues are $87M, which are smaller than Flutter Entertainment Plc quarterly revenues of $3.8B. INTRALOT SA's net income of -$2M is higher than Flutter Entertainment Plc's net income of -$789M. Notably, INTRALOT SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,750.00x while Flutter Entertainment Plc's PE ratio is 99.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for INTRALOT SA is 1.67x versus 2.41x for Flutter Entertainment Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    1.67x 2,750.00x $87M -$2M
    FLUT
    Flutter Entertainment Plc
    2.41x 99.01x $3.8B -$789M
  • Which has Higher Returns IRLTF or GMVHY?

    Entain Plc has a net margin of -2.34% compared to INTRALOT SA's net margin of --. INTRALOT SA's return on equity of 8.8% beat Entain Plc's return on equity of -18.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    34.84% -$0.01 $1.5B
    GMVHY
    Entain Plc
    -- -- $7.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About IRLTF or GMVHY?

    INTRALOT SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Entain Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that INTRALOT SA has higher upside potential than Entain Plc, analysts believe INTRALOT SA is more attractive than Entain Plc.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    0 0 0
    GMVHY
    Entain Plc
    0 0 0
  • Is IRLTF or GMVHY More Risky?

    INTRALOT SA has a beta of 0.039, which suggesting that the stock is 96.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entain Plc has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.019%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IRLTF or GMVHY?

    INTRALOT SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Entain Plc offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. INTRALOT SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Entain Plc pays out 25.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Entain Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IRLTF or GMVHY?

    INTRALOT SA quarterly revenues are $87M, which are larger than Entain Plc quarterly revenues of --. INTRALOT SA's net income of -$2M is higher than Entain Plc's net income of --. Notably, INTRALOT SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,750.00x while Entain Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for INTRALOT SA is 1.67x versus 0.96x for Entain Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    1.67x 2,750.00x $87M -$2M
    GMVHY
    Entain Plc
    0.96x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns IRLTF or GOFPY?

    Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA has a net margin of -2.34% compared to INTRALOT SA's net margin of 39.75%. INTRALOT SA's return on equity of 8.8% beat Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA's return on equity of 93.99%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    34.84% -$0.01 $1.5B
    GOFPY
    Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
    55.43% $0.21 $1.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About IRLTF or GOFPY?

    INTRALOT SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that INTRALOT SA has higher upside potential than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA, analysts believe INTRALOT SA is more attractive than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    0 0 0
    GOFPY
    Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
    0 0 0
  • Is IRLTF or GOFPY More Risky?

    INTRALOT SA has a beta of 0.039, which suggesting that the stock is 96.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.925%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IRLTF or GOFPY?

    INTRALOT SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. INTRALOT SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA pays out 86.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IRLTF or GOFPY?

    INTRALOT SA quarterly revenues are $87M, which are smaller than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA quarterly revenues of $378.4M. INTRALOT SA's net income of -$2M is lower than Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA's net income of $150.4M. Notably, INTRALOT SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,750.00x while Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA's PE ratio is 14.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for INTRALOT SA is 1.67x versus 5.32x for Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    1.67x 2,750.00x $87M -$2M
    GOFPY
    Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
    5.32x 14.08x $378.4M $150.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns IRLTF or JUMSY?

    Jumbo SA has a net margin of -2.34% compared to INTRALOT SA's net margin of --. INTRALOT SA's return on equity of 8.8% beat Jumbo SA's return on equity of 24.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    34.84% -$0.01 $1.5B
    JUMSY
    Jumbo SA
    -- -- $1.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About IRLTF or JUMSY?

    INTRALOT SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jumbo SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that INTRALOT SA has higher upside potential than Jumbo SA, analysts believe INTRALOT SA is more attractive than Jumbo SA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    0 0 0
    JUMSY
    Jumbo SA
    0 0 0
  • Is IRLTF or JUMSY More Risky?

    INTRALOT SA has a beta of 0.039, which suggesting that the stock is 96.132% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jumbo SA has a beta of 0.198, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.198%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock IRLTF or JUMSY?

    INTRALOT SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jumbo SA offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. INTRALOT SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jumbo SA pays out 19.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Jumbo SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios IRLTF or JUMSY?

    INTRALOT SA quarterly revenues are $87M, which are larger than Jumbo SA quarterly revenues of --. INTRALOT SA's net income of -$2M is higher than Jumbo SA's net income of --. Notably, INTRALOT SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 2,750.00x while Jumbo SA's PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for INTRALOT SA is 1.67x versus 3.49x for Jumbo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    IRLTF
    INTRALOT SA
    1.67x 2,750.00x $87M -$2M
    JUMSY
    Jumbo SA
    3.49x 13.14x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?

Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…

Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?

Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 67.26% over the past day.

Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8

Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.66% over the past day.

Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8

Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.37% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock