JRNGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Journey Energy, Inc.'s net margin of 71.5%. Journey Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.92% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Journey Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Journey Energy, Inc. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..

Journey Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.354% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.592%.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Journey Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Journey Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Journey Energy, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is higher than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Journey Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Journey Energy, Inc. is 1.24x versus 20.76x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Journey Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. Journey Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.92% beat HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HTC Purenergy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Journey Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than HTC Purenergy, Inc., analysts believe Journey Energy, Inc. is more attractive than HTC Purenergy, Inc..

Journey Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.354% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a beta of -0.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.849%.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HTC Purenergy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Journey Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HTC Purenergy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Journey Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are larger than HTC Purenergy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Journey Energy, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is higher than HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s net income of -$88.1K. Notably, Journey Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Journey Energy, Inc. is 1.24x versus 0.86x for HTC Purenergy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Royal Helium Ltd. has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Journey Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -510.34%. Journey Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.92% beat Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33%.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royal Helium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Journey Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Royal Helium Ltd., analysts believe Journey Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Royal Helium Ltd..

Journey Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.354% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.396%.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Helium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Journey Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Helium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Journey Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are larger than Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues of $494.4K. Journey Energy, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is higher than Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Journey Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while Royal Helium Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Journey Energy, Inc. is 1.24x versus 0.00x for Royal Helium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of 9.94% compared to Journey Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -48.93%. Journey Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.92% beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Journey Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Journey Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..

Journey Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.674, which suggesting that the stock is 67.354% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.987%.

Journey Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Journey Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Journey Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are $32.4M, which are larger than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Journey Energy, Inc.'s net income of $3.2M is higher than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Journey Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.69x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Journey Energy, Inc. is 1.24x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.