Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
25
RHCCF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0000
Seasonality move
:
13.23%
Day range:
$0.0200 - $0.0200
52-week range:
$0.0000 - $0.0230
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
0.00x
P/S ratio:
0.00x
P/B ratio:
0.00x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
42.3K
1-year change:
-99.99%
Market cap:
$400
Revenue:
$72.7K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AECFF
Action Energy, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRRDF
Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROAOF
LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLKEF
Silk Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSCAF
Tuscany Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $400 | 0.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
AECFF
Action Energy, Inc.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $100 | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
CRRDF
Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.
|
$0.0000 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
ROAOF
LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $100 | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
SLKEF
Silk Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $200 | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TSCAF
Tuscany Energy
|
$0.0000 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
37.93% | 1.933 | 129.87% | 0.06x |
|
AECFF
Action Energy, Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CRRDF
Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
ROAOF
LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SLKEF
Silk Energy Ltd.
|
-- | 81.652 | -- | -- |
|
TSCAF
Tuscany Energy
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
-$130.4K | -$1.7M | -21.62% | -34.33% | -340.41% | -$121K |
|
AECFF
Action Energy, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRRDF
Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROAOF
LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SLKEF
Silk Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSCAF
Tuscany Energy
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Royal Helium Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RHCCF or AECFF?
Action Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -510.34% compared to Royal Helium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33% beat Action Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.-26.37% -$0.01 $56.6M AECFFAction Energy, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RHCCF or AECFF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Action Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Helium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Action Energy, Inc., analysts believe Royal Helium Ltd. is more attractive than Action Energy, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0 0 0 AECFFAction Energy, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is RHCCF or AECFF More Risky?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Action Energy, Inc. has a beta of 24.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2322.721%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RHCCF or AECFF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Action Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Helium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Action Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RHCCF or AECFF?
Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues are $494.4K, which are larger than Action Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M is higher than Action Energy, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Royal Helium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.00x while Action Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Helium Ltd. is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Action Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0.00x 0.00x $494.4K -$2.5M AECFFAction Energy, Inc.0.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RHCCF or CRRDF?
Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp. has a net margin of -510.34% compared to Royal Helium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33% beat Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.-26.37% -$0.01 $56.6M CRRDFCheetah Canyon Resources Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RHCCF or CRRDF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Helium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp., analysts believe Royal Helium Ltd. is more attractive than Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0 0 0 CRRDFCheetah Canyon Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is RHCCF or CRRDF More Risky?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.323, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.673%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RHCCF or CRRDF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Helium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RHCCF or CRRDF?
Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues are $494.4K, which are larger than Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M is higher than Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Royal Helium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.00x while Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Helium Ltd. is 0.00x versus 0.00x for Cheetah Canyon Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0.00x 0.00x $494.4K -$2.5M CRRDFCheetah Canyon Resources Corp.0.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RHCCF or ROAOF?
LGX Oil + Gas, Inc. has a net margin of -510.34% compared to Royal Helium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33% beat LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.-26.37% -$0.01 $56.6M ROAOFLGX Oil + Gas, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RHCCF or ROAOF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LGX Oil + Gas, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Helium Ltd. has higher upside potential than LGX Oil + Gas, Inc., analysts believe Royal Helium Ltd. is more attractive than LGX Oil + Gas, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0 0 0 ROAOFLGX Oil + Gas, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is RHCCF or ROAOF More Risky?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LGX Oil + Gas, Inc. has a beta of 2,381.789, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 238078.931%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RHCCF or ROAOF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LGX Oil + Gas, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Helium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LGX Oil + Gas, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RHCCF or ROAOF?
Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues are $494.4K, which are larger than LGX Oil + Gas, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M is higher than LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Royal Helium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.00x while LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Helium Ltd. is 0.00x versus 0.00x for LGX Oil + Gas, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0.00x 0.00x $494.4K -$2.5M ROAOFLGX Oil + Gas, Inc.0.00x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RHCCF or SLKEF?
Silk Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -510.34% compared to Royal Helium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33% beat Silk Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.-26.37% -$0.01 $56.6M SLKEFSilk Energy Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RHCCF or SLKEF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Silk Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Helium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Silk Energy Ltd., analysts believe Royal Helium Ltd. is more attractive than Silk Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0 0 0 SLKEFSilk Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RHCCF or SLKEF More Risky?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silk Energy Ltd. has a beta of 3.953, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 295.326%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RHCCF or SLKEF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silk Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Helium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silk Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RHCCF or SLKEF?
Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues are $494.4K, which are larger than Silk Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M is higher than Silk Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Royal Helium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.00x while Silk Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Helium Ltd. is 0.00x versus -- for Silk Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0.00x 0.00x $494.4K -$2.5M SLKEFSilk Energy Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RHCCF or TSCAF?
Tuscany Energy has a net margin of -510.34% compared to Royal Helium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33% beat Tuscany Energy's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.-26.37% -$0.01 $56.6M TSCAFTuscany Energy-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RHCCF or TSCAF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tuscany Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Royal Helium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tuscany Energy, analysts believe Royal Helium Ltd. is more attractive than Tuscany Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0 0 0 TSCAFTuscany Energy0 0 0 -
Is RHCCF or TSCAF More Risky?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, which suggesting that the stock is 8.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuscany Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RHCCF or TSCAF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuscany Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Royal Helium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tuscany Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RHCCF or TSCAF?
Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues are $494.4K, which are larger than Tuscany Energy quarterly revenues of --. Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M is higher than Tuscany Energy's net income of --. Notably, Royal Helium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.00x while Tuscany Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Royal Helium Ltd. is 0.00x versus -- for Tuscany Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0.00x 0.00x $494.4K -$2.5M TSCAFTuscany Energy-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
