HXGBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dustin Group AB has a net margin of -2.45% compared to Hexagon AB's net margin of 0.06%. Hexagon AB's return on equity of 6.32% beat Dustin Group AB's return on equity of -41.83%.

Hexagon AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dustin Group AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hexagon AB has higher upside potential than Dustin Group AB, analysts believe Hexagon AB is more attractive than Dustin Group AB.

Hexagon AB has a beta of 1.915, which suggesting that the stock is 91.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dustin Group AB has a beta of -0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.443%.

Hexagon AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Dustin Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hexagon AB pays 35.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Dustin Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hexagon AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hexagon AB quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Dustin Group AB quarterly revenues of $527.8M. Hexagon AB's net income of -$37.3M is lower than Dustin Group AB's net income of $313.2K. Notably, Hexagon AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.57x while Dustin Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hexagon AB is 5.25x versus 0.07x for Dustin Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a net margin of -2.45% compared to Hexagon AB's net margin of 20.09%. Hexagon AB's return on equity of 6.32% beat Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's return on equity of 27.82%.

Hexagon AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has an analysts' consensus of $8.87 which suggests that it could fall by -10.22%. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has higher upside potential than Hexagon AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is more attractive than Hexagon AB.

Hexagon AB has a beta of 1.915, which suggesting that the stock is 91.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.001%.

Hexagon AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Hexagon AB pays 35.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson pays out 32511.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Hexagon AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's is not.

Hexagon AB quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Hexagon AB's net income of -$37.3M is lower than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Hexagon AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.57x while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's PE ratio is 12.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hexagon AB is 5.25x versus 1.35x for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neonode, Inc. has a net margin of -2.45% compared to Hexagon AB's net margin of -331.22%. Hexagon AB's return on equity of 6.32% beat Neonode, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.02%.

Hexagon AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neonode, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 173.97%. Given that Neonode, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hexagon AB, analysts believe Neonode, Inc. is more attractive than Hexagon AB.

Hexagon AB has a beta of 1.915, which suggesting that the stock is 91.484% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neonode, Inc. has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.484%.

Hexagon AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.32%. Neonode, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hexagon AB pays 35.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Neonode, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hexagon AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hexagon AB quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Neonode, Inc. quarterly revenues of $430K. Hexagon AB's net income of -$37.3M is lower than Neonode, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Hexagon AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.57x while Neonode, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hexagon AB is 5.25x versus 16.73x for Neonode, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.