SMTEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dustin Group AB has a net margin of -30.94% compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of 0.06%. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -12.47% beat Dustin Group AB's return on equity of -41.83%.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dustin Group AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart Eye AB has higher upside potential than Dustin Group AB, analysts believe Smart Eye AB is more attractive than Dustin Group AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dustin Group AB has a beta of -0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.443%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dustin Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dustin Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are $10.4M, which are smaller than Dustin Group AB quarterly revenues of $527.8M. Smart Eye AB's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Dustin Group AB's net income of $313.2K. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dustin Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 7.37x versus 0.07x for Dustin Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a net margin of -30.94% compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of 20.09%. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -12.47% beat Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's return on equity of 27.82%.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has an analysts' consensus of $8.87 which suggests that it could fall by -11.24%. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has higher upside potential than Smart Eye AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is more attractive than Smart Eye AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.001%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson pays out 32511.17% of its earnings as a dividend.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are $10.4M, which are smaller than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Smart Eye AB's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's PE ratio is 13.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 7.37x versus 1.37x for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

I.A.R. Systems Group AB has a net margin of -30.94% compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of 1.83%. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -12.47% beat I.A.R. Systems Group AB's return on equity of 15.36%.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand I.A.R. Systems Group AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smart Eye AB has higher upside potential than I.A.R. Systems Group AB, analysts believe Smart Eye AB is more attractive than I.A.R. Systems Group AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison I.A.R. Systems Group AB has a beta of 0.252, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.782%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. I.A.R. Systems Group AB offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. I.A.R. Systems Group AB pays out 14.71% of its earnings as a dividend. I.A.R. Systems Group AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are $10.4M, which are smaller than I.A.R. Systems Group AB quarterly revenues of $11.3M. Smart Eye AB's net income of -$3.2M is lower than I.A.R. Systems Group AB's net income of $207K. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while I.A.R. Systems Group AB's PE ratio is 36.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 7.37x versus 5.34x for I.A.R. Systems Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neonode, Inc. has a net margin of -30.94% compared to Smart Eye AB's net margin of -331.22%. Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -12.47% beat Neonode, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.02%.

Smart Eye AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neonode, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 157.51%. Given that Neonode, Inc. has higher upside potential than Smart Eye AB, analysts believe Neonode, Inc. is more attractive than Smart Eye AB.

Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neonode, Inc. has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.484%.

Smart Eye AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neonode, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smart Eye AB pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Neonode, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues are $10.4M, which are larger than Neonode, Inc. quarterly revenues of $430K. Smart Eye AB's net income of -$3.2M is lower than Neonode, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Smart Eye AB's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neonode, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smart Eye AB is 7.37x versus 17.80x for Neonode, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.