HRVFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fiskars Oyj Abp has a net margin of 13.14% compared to Harvia Oyj's net margin of 2.04%. Harvia Oyj's return on equity of 19.65% beat Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6%.

Harvia Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fiskars Oyj Abp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia Oyj has higher upside potential than Fiskars Oyj Abp, analysts believe Harvia Oyj is more attractive than Fiskars Oyj Abp.

Harvia Oyj has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.093%.

Harvia Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. Fiskars Oyj Abp offers a yield of 6.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Harvia Oyj pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays out 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj Abp's is not.

Harvia Oyj quarterly revenues are $53.8M, which are smaller than Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues of $303M. Harvia Oyj's net income of $7.1M is higher than Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Harvia Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.56x while Fiskars Oyj Abp's PE ratio is 40.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia Oyj is 4.14x versus 0.94x for Fiskars Oyj Abp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huhtamäki Oyj has a net margin of 13.14% compared to Harvia Oyj's net margin of 6.22%. Harvia Oyj's return on equity of 19.65% beat Huhtamäki Oyj's return on equity of 10.31%.

Harvia Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huhtamäki Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia Oyj has higher upside potential than Huhtamäki Oyj, analysts believe Harvia Oyj is more attractive than Huhtamäki Oyj.

Harvia Oyj has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huhtamäki Oyj has a beta of 0.319, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.053%.

Harvia Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. Huhtamäki Oyj offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Harvia Oyj pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj pays out 51.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harvia Oyj quarterly revenues are $53.8M, which are smaller than Huhtamäki Oyj quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Harvia Oyj's net income of $7.1M is lower than Huhtamäki Oyj's net income of $70.6M. Notably, Harvia Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.56x while Huhtamäki Oyj's PE ratio is 15.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia Oyj is 4.14x versus 0.75x for Huhtamäki Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kamux Oyj has a net margin of 13.14% compared to Harvia Oyj's net margin of 0.9%. Harvia Oyj's return on equity of 19.65% beat Kamux Oyj's return on equity of -0.21%.

Harvia Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kamux Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia Oyj has higher upside potential than Kamux Oyj, analysts believe Harvia Oyj is more attractive than Kamux Oyj.

Harvia Oyj has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kamux Oyj has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Harvia Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. Kamux Oyj offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Harvia Oyj pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Kamux Oyj pays out 60.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harvia Oyj quarterly revenues are $53.8M, which are smaller than Kamux Oyj quarterly revenues of $271.8M. Harvia Oyj's net income of $7.1M is higher than Kamux Oyj's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Harvia Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.56x while Kamux Oyj's PE ratio is 97.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia Oyj is 4.14x versus 0.48x for Kamux Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nokian Renkaat Oyj has a net margin of 13.14% compared to Harvia Oyj's net margin of 1.66%. Harvia Oyj's return on equity of 19.65% beat Nokian Renkaat Oyj's return on equity of -1.94%.

Harvia Oyj has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nokian Renkaat Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Harvia Oyj has higher upside potential than Nokian Renkaat Oyj, analysts believe Harvia Oyj is more attractive than Nokian Renkaat Oyj.

Harvia Oyj has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nokian Renkaat Oyj has a beta of 1.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.099%.

Harvia Oyj has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. Nokian Renkaat Oyj offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Harvia Oyj pays 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Nokian Renkaat Oyj pays out 315.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nokian Renkaat Oyj's is not.

Harvia Oyj quarterly revenues are $53.8M, which are smaller than Nokian Renkaat Oyj quarterly revenues of $402.1M. Harvia Oyj's net income of $7.1M is higher than Nokian Renkaat Oyj's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Harvia Oyj's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.56x while Nokian Renkaat Oyj's PE ratio is 177.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harvia Oyj is 4.14x versus 0.91x for Nokian Renkaat Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.