Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
47
FKRAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$14.71
Seasonality move
:
6.5%
Day range:
$14.71 - $14.71
52-week range:
$13.63 - $17.72
Dividend yield:
6.4%
P/E ratio:
40.92x
P/S ratio:
0.94x
P/B ratio:
1.46x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
34
1-year change:
-5.07%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.36
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
|
$1.7B | $0.33 | 21.77% | 878.13% | $46.96 |
|
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RPNMF
Rapala VMC Oyj
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
|
$14.71 | -- | $1.2B | 40.92x | $0.49 | 6.4% | 0.94x |
|
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
|
$38.37 | $46.96 | $21.3B | 69.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.52x |
|
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
|
$47.68 | -- | $891.2M | 33.56x | $0.43 | 1.76% | 4.14x |
|
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
|
$12.17 | -- | $480.8M | 97.40x | $0.08 | 0.67% | 0.48x |
|
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
|
$5.33 | -- | $1.5B | 177.80x | $0.14 | 4.7% | 0.97x |
|
RPNMF
Rapala VMC Oyj
|
$2.86 | -- | $111.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.45x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
|
48.38% | -0.836 | 63.89% | 0.48x |
|
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
|
24.86% | 2.670 | 9.68% | 0.59x |
|
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
|
45.96% | 1.095 | 15.89% | 1.62x |
|
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
|
38.51% | 0.006 | 16.34% | 0.58x |
|
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
|
48.44% | 0.081 | 102.47% | 0.83x |
|
RPNMF
Rapala VMC Oyj
|
32.78% | 0.000 | -- | 0.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
|
$140.7M | $16.4M | 1.96% | 3.6% | 5.4% | -$12.4M |
|
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
|
$998.2M | $230.9M | 4.66% | 6.34% | 13.15% | -$70M |
|
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
|
$20.2M | $10.3M | 10.61% | 19.65% | 19.16% | -$3.3M |
|
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
|
$9.5M | $4.8M | -0.13% | -0.21% | 1.76% | $19M |
|
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
|
$86.9M | $26.3M | -1.09% | -1.94% | 6.54% | -$134.9M |
|
RPNMF
Rapala VMC Oyj
|
-- | -- | -0.79% | -1.16% | -- | -- |
Fiskars Oyj Abp vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or AS?
Amer Sports, Inc. has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 8.34%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Amer Sports, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.34%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp46.43% $0.08 $1.6B ASAmer Sports, Inc.56.84% $0.25 $7.5B -
What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or AS?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amer Sports, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.96 which suggests that it could grow by 22.15%. Given that Amer Sports, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fiskars Oyj Abp, analysts believe Amer Sports, Inc. is more attractive than Fiskars Oyj Abp.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0 0 0 ASAmer Sports, Inc.20 1 0 -
Is FKRAF or AS More Risky?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amer Sports, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or AS?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Amer Sports, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Amer Sports, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or AS?
Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are smaller than Amer Sports, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is lower than Amer Sports, Inc.'s net income of $146.4M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Amer Sports, Inc.'s PE ratio is 69.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 3.52x for Amer Sports, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M ASAmer Sports, Inc.3.52x 69.07x $1.8B $146.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or HRVFF?
Harvia Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 13.14%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Harvia Oyj's return on equity of 19.65%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp46.43% $0.08 $1.6B HRVFFHarvia Oyj37.59% $0.38 $265.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or HRVFF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvia Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Harvia Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Harvia Oyj.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0 0 0 HRVFFHarvia Oyj0 0 0 -
Is FKRAF or HRVFF More Risky?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvia Oyj has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or HRVFF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Harvia Oyj offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia Oyj pays out 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj Abp's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or HRVFF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are larger than Harvia Oyj quarterly revenues of $53.8M. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is lower than Harvia Oyj's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Harvia Oyj's PE ratio is 33.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 4.14x for Harvia Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M HRVFFHarvia Oyj4.14x 33.56x $53.8M $7.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or KMUXF?
Kamux Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 0.9%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Kamux Oyj's return on equity of -0.21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp46.43% $0.08 $1.6B KMUXFKamux Oyj3.48% $0.06 $206M -
What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or KMUXF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kamux Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Kamux Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Kamux Oyj.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0 0 0 KMUXFKamux Oyj0 0 0 -
Is FKRAF or KMUXF More Risky?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kamux Oyj has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or KMUXF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Kamux Oyj offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Kamux Oyj pays out 60.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Kamux Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj Abp's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or KMUXF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are larger than Kamux Oyj quarterly revenues of $271.8M. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is higher than Kamux Oyj's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Kamux Oyj's PE ratio is 97.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 0.48x for Kamux Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M KMUXFKamux Oyj0.48x 97.40x $271.8M $2.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or NKRKY?
Nokian Renkaat Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 1.66%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Nokian Renkaat Oyj's return on equity of -1.94%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp46.43% $0.08 $1.6B NKRKYNokian Renkaat Oyj21.62% $0.02 $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or NKRKY?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nokian Renkaat Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Nokian Renkaat Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Nokian Renkaat Oyj.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0 0 0 NKRKYNokian Renkaat Oyj0 0 0 -
Is FKRAF or NKRKY More Risky?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nokian Renkaat Oyj has a beta of 1.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.099%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or NKRKY?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Nokian Renkaat Oyj offers a yield of 4.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Nokian Renkaat Oyj pays out 315.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or NKRKY?
Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are smaller than Nokian Renkaat Oyj quarterly revenues of $402.1M. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is lower than Nokian Renkaat Oyj's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Nokian Renkaat Oyj's PE ratio is 177.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 0.97x for Nokian Renkaat Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M NKRKYNokian Renkaat Oyj0.97x 177.80x $402.1M $6.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or RPNMF?
Rapala VMC Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of --. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Rapala VMC Oyj's return on equity of -1.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp46.43% $0.08 $1.6B RPNMFRapala VMC Oyj-- -- $260.8M -
What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or RPNMF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rapala VMC Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Rapala VMC Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Rapala VMC Oyj.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0 0 0 RPNMFRapala VMC Oyj0 0 0 -
Is FKRAF or RPNMF More Risky?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rapala VMC Oyj has a beta of -0.580, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.015%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or RPNMF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Rapala VMC Oyj offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Rapala VMC Oyj pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or RPNMF?
Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are larger than Rapala VMC Oyj quarterly revenues of --. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is higher than Rapala VMC Oyj's net income of --. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Rapala VMC Oyj's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 0.45x for Rapala VMC Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FKRAFFiskars Oyj Abp0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M RPNMFRapala VMC Oyj0.45x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
