Financhill
Sell
34

FKRAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$14.71
Seasonality move :
5.87%
Day range:
$14.71 - $14.71
52-week range:
$13.63 - $17.72
Dividend yield:
6.4%
P/E ratio:
40.92x
P/S ratio:
0.94x
P/B ratio:
1.46x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
53
1-year change:
-9.7%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.36

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
-- -- -- -- --
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
$1.7B $0.25 21.93% 884.6% $46.38
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$1.2B -- 3.66% -- --
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
-- -- -- -- --
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
-- -- -- -- --
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
$14.71 -- $1.2B 40.92x $0.49 6.4% 0.94x
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
$35.98 $46.38 $20B 64.77x $0.00 0% 3.30x
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$32.10 -- $3.4B 15.30x $0.64 3.94% 0.75x
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
$47.68 -- $891.2M 33.56x $0.43 1.76% 4.14x
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
$12.17 -- $483.2M 97.40x $0.08 0.67% 0.48x
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
$4.99 -- $1.4B 177.80x $0.14 5.03% 0.91x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
48.38% -0.836 63.89% 0.48x
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
24.86% 2.670 9.68% 0.59x
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
46.57% 0.221 50.33% 0.91x
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
45.96% 1.095 15.89% 1.62x
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
38.51% 0.006 16.34% 0.58x
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
48.44% 0.081 102.47% 0.83x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FKRAF
Fiskars Oyj Abp
$140.7M $16.4M 1.96% 3.6% 5.4% -$12.4M
AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
$998.2M $230.9M 4.66% 6.34% 13.15% -$70M
HOYFF
Huhtamäki Oyj
$216.6M $104.4M 5.66% 10.31% 9.2% $86.8M
HRVFF
Harvia Oyj
$20.2M $10.3M 10.61% 19.65% 19.16% -$3.3M
KMUXF
Kamux Oyj
$9.5M $4.8M -0.13% -0.21% 1.76% $19M
NKRKY
Nokian Renkaat Oyj
$86.9M $26.3M -1.09% -1.94% 6.54% -$134.9M

Fiskars Oyj Abp vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or AS?

    Amer Sports, Inc. has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 8.34%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Amer Sports, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    46.43% $0.08 $1.6B
    AS
    Amer Sports, Inc.
    56.84% $0.25 $7.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or AS?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Amer Sports, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $46.38 which suggests that it could grow by 28.89%. Given that Amer Sports, Inc. has higher upside potential than Fiskars Oyj Abp, analysts believe Amer Sports, Inc. is more attractive than Fiskars Oyj Abp.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0 0 0
    AS
    Amer Sports, Inc.
    20 1 0
  • Is FKRAF or AS More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amer Sports, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or AS?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Amer Sports, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Amer Sports, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or AS?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are smaller than Amer Sports, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is lower than Amer Sports, Inc.'s net income of $146.4M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Amer Sports, Inc.'s PE ratio is 64.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 3.30x for Amer Sports, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M
    AS
    Amer Sports, Inc.
    3.30x 64.77x $1.8B $146.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Huhtamäki Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 6.22%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Huhtamäki Oyj's return on equity of 10.31%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    46.43% $0.08 $1.6B
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    19.1% $0.65 $4.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Huhtamäki Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Huhtamäki Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Huhtamäki Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0 0 0
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or HOYFF More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huhtamäki Oyj has a beta of 0.319, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.053%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Huhtamäki Oyj offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj pays out 51.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Huhtamäki Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj Abp's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or HOYFF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are smaller than Huhtamäki Oyj quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is lower than Huhtamäki Oyj's net income of $70.6M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Huhtamäki Oyj's PE ratio is 15.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 0.75x for Huhtamäki Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M
    HOYFF
    Huhtamäki Oyj
    0.75x 15.30x $1.1B $70.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Harvia Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 13.14%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Harvia Oyj's return on equity of 19.65%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    46.43% $0.08 $1.6B
    HRVFF
    Harvia Oyj
    37.59% $0.38 $265.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvia Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Harvia Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Harvia Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0 0 0
    HRVFF
    Harvia Oyj
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or HRVFF More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvia Oyj has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Harvia Oyj offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia Oyj pays out 57.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvia Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj Abp's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or HRVFF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are larger than Harvia Oyj quarterly revenues of $53.8M. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is lower than Harvia Oyj's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Harvia Oyj's PE ratio is 33.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 4.14x for Harvia Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M
    HRVFF
    Harvia Oyj
    4.14x 33.56x $53.8M $7.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Kamux Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 0.9%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Kamux Oyj's return on equity of -0.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    46.43% $0.08 $1.6B
    KMUXF
    Kamux Oyj
    3.48% $0.06 $206M
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kamux Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Kamux Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Kamux Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0 0 0
    KMUXF
    Kamux Oyj
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or KMUXF More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kamux Oyj has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Kamux Oyj offers a yield of 0.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Kamux Oyj pays out 60.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Kamux Oyj's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Fiskars Oyj Abp's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or KMUXF?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are larger than Kamux Oyj quarterly revenues of $271.8M. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is higher than Kamux Oyj's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Kamux Oyj's PE ratio is 97.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 0.48x for Kamux Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M
    KMUXF
    Kamux Oyj
    0.48x 97.40x $271.8M $2.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Nokian Renkaat Oyj has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Fiskars Oyj Abp's net margin of 1.66%. Fiskars Oyj Abp's return on equity of 3.6% beat Nokian Renkaat Oyj's return on equity of -1.94%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    46.43% $0.08 $1.6B
    NKRKY
    Nokian Renkaat Oyj
    21.62% $0.02 $2.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nokian Renkaat Oyj has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fiskars Oyj Abp has higher upside potential than Nokian Renkaat Oyj, analysts believe Fiskars Oyj Abp is more attractive than Nokian Renkaat Oyj.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0 0 0
    NKRKY
    Nokian Renkaat Oyj
    0 0 0
  • Is FKRAF or NKRKY More Risky?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a beta of -0.031, which suggesting that the stock is 103.093% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nokian Renkaat Oyj has a beta of 1.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.099%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.4%. Nokian Renkaat Oyj offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Fiskars Oyj Abp pays 250.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Nokian Renkaat Oyj pays out 315.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FKRAF or NKRKY?

    Fiskars Oyj Abp quarterly revenues are $303M, which are smaller than Nokian Renkaat Oyj quarterly revenues of $402.1M. Fiskars Oyj Abp's net income of $6.2M is lower than Nokian Renkaat Oyj's net income of $6.7M. Notably, Fiskars Oyj Abp's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.92x while Nokian Renkaat Oyj's PE ratio is 177.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fiskars Oyj Abp is 0.94x versus 0.91x for Nokian Renkaat Oyj. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FKRAF
    Fiskars Oyj Abp
    0.94x 40.92x $303M $6.2M
    NKRKY
    Nokian Renkaat Oyj
    0.91x 177.80x $402.1M $6.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Amazon an AI Stock?
Is Amazon an AI Stock?

With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…

Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?

Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…

How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x

Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5

SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.

Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.

Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5

Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock