Is JetBlue The Best Airline Stock?
Following a general trend of improvement among airline stocks, shares…
Buy
53
HOKCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.90
Seasonality move
:
2.07%
Day range:
$0.82 - $0.87
52-week range:
$0.67 - $1.00
Dividend yield:
5.34%
P/E ratio:
22.01x
P/S ratio:
2.21x
P/B ratio:
2.15x
Volume:
2.8K
Avg. volume:
13.6K
1-year change:
15.94%
Market cap:
$15.7B
Revenue:
$7.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.
|
$0.84 | -- | $15.7B | 22.01x | $0.02 | 5.34% | 2.21x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.59x | $0.01 | 5.95% | 0.57x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$37.10 | -- | $12.8B | 7.59x | $0.68 | 5.4% | 0.93x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
$6.50 | -- | $13.9B | 17.53x | $0.10 | 5.57% | 132.07x |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0021 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.09 | -- | $147.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.78x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.
|
50.41% | -0.311 | -- | 0.53x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
79.58% | 0.187 | -- | 0.65x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
63.41% | 0.208 | -- | 0.52x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
2.8% | -0.263 | -- | 0.68x |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
217.69% | -14.998 | -- | 0.47x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
16.77% | -0.070 | -- | 2.80x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HOKCY
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.47% | 8.26% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -19.25% | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.98% | -8.62% | -- | -- |
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.-- -- $16.3B CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or CGEGF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or CGEGF More Risky?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -2.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 334.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or CGEGF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. pays 91.02% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or CGEGF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.01x while CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is 2.21x versus 0.57x for CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.2.21x 22.01x -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.57x 4.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or CRPJY?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.-- -- $16.3B CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or CRPJY?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.0 0 0 CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or CRPJY More Risky?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.36%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or CRPJY?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. pays 91.02% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 36.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or CRPJY?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.01x while China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is 2.21x versus 0.93x for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.2.21x 22.01x -- -- CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.93x 7.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or HGKGY?
Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.-- -- $16.3B HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or HGKGY?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.0 0 0 HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or HGKGY More Risky?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or HGKGY?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. pays 91.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 86.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or HGKGY?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.01x while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is 2.21x versus 132.07x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.2.21x 22.01x -- -- HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.132.07x 17.53x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or SHUNF?
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.-- -- $16.3B SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $214.4M -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or SHUNF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or SHUNF More Risky?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.051, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.877%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or SHUNF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. pays 91.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or SHUNF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.01x while Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is 2.21x versus 0.53x for Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.2.21x 22.01x -- -- SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0.53x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HOKCY or SMTLF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net margin of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.26% beat GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.-- -- $16.3B SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M -
What do Analysts Say About HOKCY or SMTLF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd., analysts believe The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is more attractive than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.0 0 0 SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HOKCY or SMTLF More Risky?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.232, which suggesting that the stock is 76.764% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.471%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HOKCY or SMTLF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.34%. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. pays 91.02% of its earnings as a dividend. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HOKCY or SMTLF?
The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.01x while GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd. is 2.21x versus 0.78x for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HOKCYThe Hong Kong & China Gas Co., Ltd.2.21x 22.01x -- -- SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Netflix Buy Warner Bros?
Following a bidding war, Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX) has announced its intention…
Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
60
OLMA alert for Dec 10
Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [OLMA] is up 15.35% over the past day.
Buy
84
TSAT alert for Dec 10
Telesat Corp. [TSAT] is up 3.07% over the past day.
Buy
54
GDXU alert for Dec 10
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 4.83% over the past day.
