HDELY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of 27.96%. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 9.73% beat KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA's return on equity of 19.13%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 42.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA has a beta of 0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.548%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 25.1% of its earnings as a dividend. KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA pays out 22.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA quarterly revenues of $273.4M. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA's net income of $76.4M. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA's PE ratio is 7.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.01x versus 1.08x for KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

K+S AG has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of -3.05%. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 9.73% beat K+S AG's return on equity of 0.39%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand K+S AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than K+S AG, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than K+S AG.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 42.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison K+S AG has a beta of 0.891, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.945%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. K+S AG offers a yield of 6.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 25.1% of its earnings as a dividend. K+S AG pays out 91.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than K+S AG quarterly revenues of $952.7M. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than K+S AG's net income of -$29M. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while K+S AG's PE ratio is 74.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.01x versus 0.49x for K+S AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGL Carbon SE has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of 1.39%. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 9.73% beat SGL Carbon SE's return on equity of 10.74%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGL Carbon SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than SGL Carbon SE, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than SGL Carbon SE.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 42.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGL Carbon SE has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.536%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. SGL Carbon SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 25.1% of its earnings as a dividend. SGL Carbon SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Heidelberg Materials AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SGL Carbon SE quarterly revenues of $268.2M. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than SGL Carbon SE's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while SGL Carbon SE's PE ratio is 6.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.01x versus 0.40x for SGL Carbon SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Symrise AG has a net margin of -- compared to Heidelberg Materials AG's net margin of --. Heidelberg Materials AG's return on equity of 9.73% beat Symrise AG's return on equity of 10.53%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Symrise AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Heidelberg Materials AG has higher upside potential than Symrise AG, analysts believe Heidelberg Materials AG is more attractive than Symrise AG.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a beta of 1.430, which suggesting that the stock is 42.995% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Symrise AG has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.446%.

Heidelberg Materials AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Symrise AG offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Heidelberg Materials AG pays 25.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Symrise AG pays out 43.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Heidelberg Materials AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Symrise AG quarterly revenues of --. Heidelberg Materials AG's net income of -- is lower than Symrise AG's net income of --. Notably, Heidelberg Materials AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.80x while Symrise AG's PE ratio is 34.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidelberg Materials AG is 1.01x versus 2.81x for Symrise AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.