3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Sell
46
GXYEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.25
Seasonality move
:
11.08%
Day range:
$4.25 - $4.25
52-week range:
$3.35 - $5.84
Dividend yield:
1.51%
P/E ratio:
17.66x
P/S ratio:
3.51x
P/B ratio:
1.97x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
660
1-year change:
-24.91%
Market cap:
$18.6B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.24
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
|
$2.9B | $0.60 | 1.73% | 1.07% | $59.96 |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$1.2B | $0.02 | 7.86% | -100% | $9.15 |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCHYY
Sands China
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group
|
$4.25 | -- | $18.6B | 17.66x | $0.06 | 1.51% | 3.51x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
|
$50.93 | $59.96 | $36.9B | 25.21x | $0.20 | 1.57% | 3.36x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$5.72 | $9.15 | $2.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.55x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
$4.98 | -- | $959.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.53x |
|
SCHYY
Sands China
|
$25.27 | -- | $20.5B | 21.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.84x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
$0.33 | -- | $2.3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.39x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group
|
5.03% | 1.503 | 2.3% | 1.60x |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
|
80.35% | 1.450 | 38.16% | 0.86x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
122.07% | 1.768 | 195.07% | 1.06x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
76.4% | 0.465 | 150.6% | 0.75x |
|
SCHYY
Sands China
|
93.82% | 1.067 | 47.75% | 1.53x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
-- | -0.987 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group
|
-- | -- | 11.26% | 11.67% | -- | -- |
|
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
|
$1.3B | $519M | 8.33% | 37.37% | 21.7% | $220M |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts and Entertainment
|
$432.7M | $144.3M | -2.16% | -- | 11.83% | -- |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings
|
$113.4M | $16M | -2.96% | -12.62% | 7.07% | -- |
|
SCHYY
Sands China
|
-- | -- | 12.67% | -- | -- | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Galaxy Entertainment Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or LVS?
Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group's net margin of 10.25%. Galaxy Entertainment Group's return on equity of 11.67% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 37.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group-- -- $10B LVSLas Vegas Sands47.32% $0.38 $17.7B -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or LVS?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $59.96 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Galaxy Entertainment Group, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Galaxy Entertainment Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group0 0 0 LVSLas Vegas Sands13 4 0 -
Is GXYEF or LVS More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.22%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or LVS?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group pays 12.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 24.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or LVS?
Galaxy Entertainment Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Galaxy Entertainment Group's net income of -- is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $275M. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 25.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group is 3.51x versus 3.36x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group3.51x 17.66x -- -- LVSLas Vegas Sands3.36x 25.21x $2.7B $275M
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group's net margin of 2.32%. Galaxy Entertainment Group's return on equity of 11.67% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group-- -- $10B MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment36.82% $0.06 $6.3B -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or MLCO?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $9.15 which suggests that it could grow by 59.97%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than Galaxy Entertainment Group, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than Galaxy Entertainment Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment8 4 0 -
Is GXYEF or MLCO More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.707%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or MLCO?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group pays 12.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out -0.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or MLCO?
Galaxy Entertainment Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Galaxy Entertainment Group's net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $27.3M. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group is 3.51x versus 0.55x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group3.51x 17.66x -- -- MLCOMelco Resorts and Entertainment0.55x -- $1.2B $27.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or MSC?
Studio City International Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group's net margin of -12.01%. Galaxy Entertainment Group's return on equity of 11.67% beat Studio City International Holdings's return on equity of -12.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group-- -- $10B MSCStudio City International Holdings64.95% -$0.11 $2.8B -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or MSC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Studio City International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 120.88%. Given that Studio City International Holdings has higher upside potential than Galaxy Entertainment Group, analysts believe Studio City International Holdings is more attractive than Galaxy Entertainment Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group0 0 0 MSCStudio City International Holdings0 0 0 -
Is GXYEF or MSC More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Studio City International Holdings has a beta of -0.383, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.285%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or MSC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Studio City International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group pays 12.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Studio City International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or MSC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Studio City International Holdings quarterly revenues of $174.6M. Galaxy Entertainment Group's net income of -- is lower than Studio City International Holdings's net income of -$21M. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while Studio City International Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group is 3.51x versus 1.53x for Studio City International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group3.51x 17.66x -- -- MSCStudio City International Holdings1.53x -- $174.6M -$21M
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or SCHYY?
Sands China has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group's net margin of --. Galaxy Entertainment Group's return on equity of 11.67% beat Sands China's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group-- -- $10B SCHYYSands China-- -- $8.5B -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or SCHYY?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sands China has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Entertainment Group has higher upside potential than Sands China, analysts believe Galaxy Entertainment Group is more attractive than Sands China.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group0 0 0 SCHYYSands China0 0 0 -
Is GXYEF or SCHYY More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sands China has a beta of 0.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.401%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or SCHYY?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. Sands China offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group pays 12.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Sands China pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or SCHYY?
Galaxy Entertainment Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sands China quarterly revenues of --. Galaxy Entertainment Group's net income of -- is lower than Sands China's net income of --. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while Sands China's PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group is 3.51x versus 2.84x for Sands China. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group3.51x 17.66x -- -- SCHYYSands China2.84x 21.21x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or SJMHF?
SJM Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group's net margin of 1.44%. Galaxy Entertainment Group's return on equity of 11.67% beat SJM Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group-- -- $10B SJMHFSJM Holdings-- $0.00 -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or SJMHF?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SJM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Entertainment Group has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings, analysts believe Galaxy Entertainment Group is more attractive than SJM Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group0 0 0 SJMHFSJM Holdings0 0 0 -
Is GXYEF or SJMHF More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a beta of 0.520, which suggesting that the stock is 47.986% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJM Holdings has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.156%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or SJMHF?
Galaxy Entertainment Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.51%. SJM Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group pays 12.8% of its earnings as a dividend. SJM Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or SJMHF?
Galaxy Entertainment Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SJM Holdings quarterly revenues of $896.8M. Galaxy Entertainment Group's net income of -- is lower than SJM Holdings's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while SJM Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group is 3.51x versus 1.39x for SJM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group3.51x 17.66x -- -- SJMHFSJM Holdings1.39x -- $896.8M $12.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will American Tower Stock Recover?
The performance of the real estate investment trust, or REIT,…
Will Booking Holdings Stock Split?
Booking Holdings, the travel and technology company that owns brands…
Stock Ideas
Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 125x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
50
NARI alert for Jan 7
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.11% over the past day.
Buy
70
PDEX alert for Jan 7
Pro-Dex [PDEX] is down 7.03% over the past day.
Buy
52
ALCO alert for Jan 7
Alico [ALCO] is down 0.7% over the past day.
