Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
56
GXYEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.31
Seasonality move
:
8.33%
Day range:
$5.04 - $5.04
52-week range:
$3.00 - $5.80
Dividend yield:
3.05%
P/E ratio:
17.88x
P/S ratio:
6.23x
P/B ratio:
2.16x
Volume:
16.2K
Avg. volume:
2.6K
1-year change:
21.62%
Market cap:
$22B
Revenue:
$3.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.28
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$1.3B | $0.09 | 8.72% | 42.63% | $11.00 |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
$5.04 | -- | $22B | 17.88x | $0.09 | 3.05% | 6.23x |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
$4.00 | -- | $57.3M | 0.77x | $0.00 | 0% | 30.57x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$8.78 | $11.00 | $3.4B | 33.40x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.71x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
$3.36 | -- | $647.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.94x |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
$2.77 | -- | $31.9M | 83.17x | $0.20 | 28.88% | 0.78x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.32 | -- | $2.3B | 4,982.35x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.01x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
0.62% | 2.285 | -- | 2.04x |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
-- | 1.878 | -- | 6.85x |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
120.74% | 2.067 | 193.76% | 1.00x |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
79.17% | 0.847 | 257.64% | 0.66x |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
7.65% | 0.351 | 4.21% | 2.17x |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
65.52% | 1.088 | -- | 0.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXYEF
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.07% | 12.52% | -- | -- |
|
MI
NFT Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.
|
$375.8M | $192.2M | 0.91% | -- | 14.66% | -- |
|
MSC
Studio City International Holdings Ltd.
|
$70.4M | $24M | -2.6% | -11.58% | 13.12% | -- |
|
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
|
$7M | -$495K | -0.35% | -0.38% | -5.22% | $70K |
|
SJMHF
SJM Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.03% | -- | -- |
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or MI?
NFT Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.52% beat NFT Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.-- -- $10.3B MINFT Ltd.-- -- $74.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or MI?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than NFT Ltd., analysts believe Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. is more attractive than NFT Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.0 0 0 MINFT Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GXYEF or MI More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT Ltd. has a beta of 3.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 288.687%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or MI?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. NFT Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. pays 49.93% of its earnings as a dividend. NFT Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or MI?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NFT Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than NFT Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while NFT Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. is 6.23x versus 30.57x for NFT Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.6.23x 17.88x -- -- MINFT Ltd.30.57x 0.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or MLCO?
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net margin of 4.74%. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.52% beat Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.-- -- $10.3B MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.28.66% $0.19 $6.7B -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or MLCO?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.33%. Given that Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd., analysts believe Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. is more attractive than Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.0 0 0 MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.6 5 0 -
Is GXYEF or MLCO More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. has a beta of 0.641, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.922%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or MLCO?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. pays 49.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or MLCO?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s net income of $62.1M. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 33.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. is 6.23x versus 0.71x for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.6.23x 17.88x -- -- MLCOMelco Resorts & Entertainment Ltd.0.71x 33.40x $1.3B $62.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or MSC?
Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net margin of -11.13%. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.52% beat Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.-- -- $10.3B MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.38.56% -$0.10 $2.7B -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or MSC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 227.38%. Given that Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd., analysts believe Studio City International Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.0 0 0 MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GXYEF or MSC More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Studio City International Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -0.131, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.058%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or MSC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Studio City International Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. pays 49.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Studio City International Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or MSC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Studio City International Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $182.5M. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$20.3M. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while Studio City International Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. is 6.23x versus 0.94x for Studio City International Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.6.23x 17.88x -- -- MSCStudio City International Holdings Ltd.0.94x -- $182.5M -$20.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or NHTC?
Natural Health Trends Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net margin of -4.55%. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.52% beat Natural Health Trends Corp.'s return on equity of -0.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.-- -- $10.3B NHTCNatural Health Trends Corp.73.43% -$0.04 $28.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or NHTC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Health Trends Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 983.03%. Given that Natural Health Trends Corp. has higher upside potential than Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd., analysts believe Natural Health Trends Corp. is more attractive than Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.0 0 0 NHTCNatural Health Trends Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GXYEF or NHTC More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends Corp. has a beta of 0.805, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.477%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or NHTC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. Natural Health Trends Corp. offers a yield of 28.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. pays 49.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends Corp. pays out 1606.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or NHTC?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Natural Health Trends Corp. quarterly revenues of $9.5M. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Natural Health Trends Corp.'s net income of -$431K. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while Natural Health Trends Corp.'s PE ratio is 83.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. is 6.23x versus 0.78x for Natural Health Trends Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.6.23x 17.88x -- -- NHTCNatural Health Trends Corp.0.78x 83.17x $9.5M -$431K
-
Which has Higher Returns GXYEF or SJMHF?
SJM Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net margin of 1.44%. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.52% beat SJM Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.-- -- $10.3B SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.-- $0.00 $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About GXYEF or SJMHF?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SJM Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than SJM Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. is more attractive than SJM Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.0 0 0 SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GXYEF or SJMHF More Risky?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.274, which suggesting that the stock is 72.614% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJM Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.657, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.326%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXYEF or SJMHF?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.05%. SJM Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. pays 49.93% of its earnings as a dividend. SJM Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXYEF or SJMHF?
Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SJM Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $896.8M. Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SJM Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $12.9M. Notably, Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.88x while SJM Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4,982.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd. is 6.23x versus 1.01x for SJM Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXYEFGalaxy Entertainment Group Ltd.6.23x 17.88x -- -- SJMHFSJM Holdings Ltd.1.01x 4,982.35x $896.8M $12.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
