GSPI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AlphaVest Acquisition Corp. has a net margin of -150.85% compared to Green Star Products, Inc.'s net margin of --. Green Star Products, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat AlphaVest Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of -9.36%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AlphaVest Acquisition Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Star Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than AlphaVest Acquisition Corp., analysts believe Green Star Products, Inc. is more attractive than AlphaVest Acquisition Corp..

Green Star Products, Inc. has a beta of -2.237, which suggesting that the stock is 323.662% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AlphaVest Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AlphaVest Acquisition Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Star Products, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AlphaVest Acquisition Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Star Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.6K, which are larger than AlphaVest Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Green Star Products, Inc.'s net income of -$35.6K is higher than AlphaVest Acquisition Corp.'s net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Green Star Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AlphaVest Acquisition Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Star Products, Inc. is 2.40x versus -- for AlphaVest Acquisition Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of -150.85% compared to Green Star Products, Inc.'s net margin of 19.49%. Green Star Products, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.08 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has higher upside potential than Green Star Products, Inc., analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. is more attractive than Green Star Products, Inc..

Green Star Products, Inc. has a beta of -2.237, which suggesting that the stock is 323.662% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.06%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 11.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Green Star Products, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 84.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Green Star Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.6K, which are smaller than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $36.4M. Green Star Products, Inc.'s net income of -$35.6K is lower than Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Green Star Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Star Products, Inc. is 2.40x versus 3.54x for Crescent Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global Corp. has a net margin of -150.85% compared to Green Star Products, Inc.'s net margin of --. Green Star Products, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Graf Global Corp.'s return on equity of 3.79%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Star Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than Graf Global Corp., analysts believe Green Star Products, Inc. is more attractive than Graf Global Corp..

Green Star Products, Inc. has a beta of -2.237, which suggesting that the stock is 323.662% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Star Products, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Star Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.6K, which are larger than Graf Global Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Green Star Products, Inc.'s net income of -$35.6K is lower than Graf Global Corp.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, Green Star Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Graf Global Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Star Products, Inc. is 2.40x versus -- for Graf Global Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Legato Merger Corp. III has a net margin of -150.85% compared to Green Star Products, Inc.'s net margin of --. Green Star Products, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Legato Merger Corp. III's return on equity of 4.1%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Legato Merger Corp. III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Green Star Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than Legato Merger Corp. III, analysts believe Green Star Products, Inc. is more attractive than Legato Merger Corp. III.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a beta of -2.237, which suggesting that the stock is 323.662% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Legato Merger Corp. III has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Green Star Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Legato Merger Corp. III offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Green Star Products, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Legato Merger Corp. III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Green Star Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $23.6K, which are larger than Legato Merger Corp. III quarterly revenues of --. Green Star Products, Inc.'s net income of -$35.6K is lower than Legato Merger Corp. III's net income of $2M. Notably, Green Star Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Legato Merger Corp. III's PE ratio is 32.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Green Star Products, Inc. is 2.40x versus -- for Legato Merger Corp. III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.