GRNNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Adler Group SA has a net margin of 35.61% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of -529.31%. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of -3.42% beat Adler Group SA's return on equity of 206.87%.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Adler Group SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grand City Properties SA has higher upside potential than Adler Group SA, analysts believe Grand City Properties SA is more attractive than Adler Group SA.

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Adler Group SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Adler Group SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Adler Group SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $163.8M, which are larger than Adler Group SA quarterly revenues of $90.6M. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $58.3M is lower than Adler Group SA's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Adler Group SA's PE ratio is 0.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.78x versus 0.12x for Adler Group SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has a net margin of 35.61% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of -23.1%. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of -3.42% beat Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA's return on equity of --.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1255.01%. Given that Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has higher upside potential than Grand City Properties SA, analysts believe Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA is more attractive than Grand City Properties SA.

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.055%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $163.8M, which are larger than Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA quarterly revenues of $40.5M. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $58.3M is higher than Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA's net income of -$9.4M. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.78x versus 0.14x for Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logistic Properties of the Americas has a net margin of 35.61% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of --. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of -3.42% beat Logistic Properties of the Americas's return on equity of --.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Logistic Properties of the Americas has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grand City Properties SA has higher upside potential than Logistic Properties of the Americas, analysts believe Grand City Properties SA is more attractive than Logistic Properties of the Americas.

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logistic Properties of the Americas has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Logistic Properties of the Americas offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Logistic Properties of the Americas pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $163.8M, which are larger than Logistic Properties of the Americas quarterly revenues of --. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $58.3M is higher than Logistic Properties of the Americas's net income of --. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Logistic Properties of the Americas's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.78x versus -- for Logistic Properties of the Americas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Belpointe PREP LLC has a net margin of 35.61% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of -805.58%. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of -3.42% beat Belpointe PREP LLC's return on equity of -6.19%.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Belpointe PREP LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grand City Properties SA has higher upside potential than Belpointe PREP LLC, analysts believe Grand City Properties SA is more attractive than Belpointe PREP LLC.

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.362, which suggesting that the stock is 36.172% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Belpointe PREP LLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Belpointe PREP LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Belpointe PREP LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $163.8M, which are larger than Belpointe PREP LLC quarterly revenues of $860K. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $58.3M is higher than Belpointe PREP LLC's net income of -$6.9M. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Belpointe PREP LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.78x versus 118.62x for Belpointe PREP LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.