GRNNF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has a net margin of 75.55% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of -5.85%. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of 14.62% beat Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA's return on equity of --.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1049.43%. Given that Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has higher upside potential than Grand City Properties SA, analysts believe Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA is more attractive than Grand City Properties SA.

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 32.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA has a beta of 0.171, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.851%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $178.5M, which are larger than Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA quarterly revenues of $39.7M. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $222M is higher than Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.36x while Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.05x versus 0.83x for Altisource Portfolio Solutions SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Concept Energy, Inc. has a net margin of 75.55% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of -51.28%. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of 14.62% beat New Concept Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.7%.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Concept Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grand City Properties SA has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, Inc., analysts believe Grand City Properties SA is more attractive than New Concept Energy, Inc..

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 32.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy, Inc. has a beta of -0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.158%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Concept Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $178.5M, which are larger than New Concept Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39K. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $222M is higher than New Concept Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20K. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.36x while New Concept Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.05x versus 25.50x for New Concept Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Logistic Properties of the Americas has a net margin of 75.55% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of 40.63%. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of 14.62% beat Logistic Properties of the Americas's return on equity of 5.34%.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Logistic Properties of the Americas has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grand City Properties SA has higher upside potential than Logistic Properties of the Americas, analysts believe Grand City Properties SA is more attractive than Logistic Properties of the Americas.

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 32.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Logistic Properties of the Americas has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Logistic Properties of the Americas offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Logistic Properties of the Americas pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $178.5M, which are larger than Logistic Properties of the Americas quarterly revenues of $12.9M. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $222M is higher than Logistic Properties of the Americas's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.36x while Logistic Properties of the Americas's PE ratio is 13.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.05x versus 1.89x for Logistic Properties of the Americas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Belpointe PREP LLC has a net margin of 75.55% compared to Grand City Properties SA's net margin of -509.49%. Grand City Properties SA's return on equity of 14.62% beat Belpointe PREP LLC's return on equity of -12.32%.

Grand City Properties SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Belpointe PREP LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grand City Properties SA has higher upside potential than Belpointe PREP LLC, analysts believe Grand City Properties SA is more attractive than Belpointe PREP LLC.

Grand City Properties SA has a beta of 1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 32.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Belpointe PREP LLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grand City Properties SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Belpointe PREP LLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grand City Properties SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Belpointe PREP LLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grand City Properties SA quarterly revenues are $178.5M, which are larger than Belpointe PREP LLC quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Grand City Properties SA's net income of $222M is higher than Belpointe PREP LLC's net income of -$12.1M. Notably, Grand City Properties SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.36x while Belpointe PREP LLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grand City Properties SA is 3.05x versus 31.81x for Belpointe PREP LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.