Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Buy
59
GRDLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.15
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$10.15 - $10.15
52-week range:
$4.62 - $10.15
Dividend yield:
2.21%
P/E ratio:
9.65x
P/S ratio:
2.52x
P/B ratio:
0.87x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
4
1-year change:
119.7%
Market cap:
$680.4M
Revenue:
$271.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.05
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
$10.15 | -- | $680.4M | 9.65x | $0.31 | 2.21% | 2.52x |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
$28.69 | -- | $4.9B | 14.59x | $0.51 | 3.58% | 0.70x |
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
$1.30 | -- | $124.3M | 7.51x | $0.09 | 6.76% | 0.23x |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.03 | -- | $10.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $41.2M | 3.19x | $0.03 | 23.77% | 0.18x |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
$7.09 | -- | $557M | 11.47x | $0.10 | 5.5% | 0.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
18.26% | 2.489 | -- | 2.04x |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
49.3% | 0.576 | -- | 0.63x |
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
23% | -0.104 | -- | 0.62x |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
42% | 0.000 | 577.54% | 0.79x |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
15.12% | 0.198 | -- | 1.54x |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
11.64% | 0.063 | -- | 1.65x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.22% | 3.92% | -- | -- |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 9.33% | 17.42% | -- | -- |
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.71% | 14.24% | -- | -- |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -4.63% | -8.2% | -- | -- |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.51% | 14.93% | -- | -$3.9M |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.02% | 11.56% | -- | -- |
Grindrod Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GRDLY or BDVSY?
The Bidvest Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Grindrod Ltd.'s net margin of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.92% beat The Bidvest Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.-- -- $642.6M BDVSYThe Bidvest Group Ltd.-- -- $4B -
What do Analysts Say About GRDLY or BDVSY?
Grindrod Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Bidvest Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grindrod Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Bidvest Group Ltd., analysts believe Grindrod Ltd. is more attractive than The Bidvest Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.0 0 0 BDVSYThe Bidvest Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRDLY or BDVSY More Risky?
Grindrod Ltd. has a beta of -0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 135.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Bidvest Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.698, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRDLY or BDVSY?
Grindrod Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. The Bidvest Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Grindrod Ltd. pays 51.07% of its earnings as a dividend. The Bidvest Group Ltd. pays out 40.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRDLY or BDVSY?
Grindrod Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Bidvest Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Bidvest Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Grindrod Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while The Bidvest Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindrod Ltd. is 2.52x versus 0.70x for The Bidvest Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.2.52x 9.65x -- -- BDVSYThe Bidvest Group Ltd.0.70x 14.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GRDLY or BLLQF?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Grindrod Ltd.'s net margin of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.92% beat Bell Equipment Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.-- -- $642.6M BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.-- -- $379.4M -
What do Analysts Say About GRDLY or BLLQF?
Grindrod Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bell Equipment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grindrod Ltd. has higher upside potential than Bell Equipment Ltd., analysts believe Grindrod Ltd. is more attractive than Bell Equipment Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.0 0 0 BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRDLY or BLLQF More Risky?
Grindrod Ltd. has a beta of -0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 135.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bell Equipment Ltd. has a beta of -0.244, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.385%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRDLY or BLLQF?
Grindrod Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Bell Equipment Ltd. offers a yield of 6.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Grindrod Ltd. pays 51.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Bell Equipment Ltd. pays out 34.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRDLY or BLLQF?
Grindrod Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Bell Equipment Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Grindrod Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while Bell Equipment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindrod Ltd. is 2.52x versus 0.23x for Bell Equipment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.2.52x 9.65x -- -- BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0.23x 7.51x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GRDLY or MURSF?
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Grindrod Ltd.'s net margin of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.92% beat Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.-- -- $642.6M MURSFMurray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.-- -- $142.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GRDLY or MURSF?
Grindrod Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grindrod Ltd. has higher upside potential than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Grindrod Ltd. is more attractive than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.0 0 0 MURSFMurray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRDLY or MURSF More Risky?
Grindrod Ltd. has a beta of -0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 135.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.194%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRDLY or MURSF?
Grindrod Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grindrod Ltd. pays 51.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Grindrod Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRDLY or MURSF?
Grindrod Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Grindrod Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindrod Ltd. is 2.52x versus 0.03x for Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.2.52x 9.65x -- -- MURSFMurray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GRDLY or NVSHF?
Novus Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Grindrod Ltd.'s net margin of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.92% beat Novus Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.-- -- $642.6M NVSHFNovus Holdings Ltd.-- -- $155M -
What do Analysts Say About GRDLY or NVSHF?
Grindrod Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Novus Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grindrod Ltd. has higher upside potential than Novus Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Grindrod Ltd. is more attractive than Novus Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.0 0 0 NVSHFNovus Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRDLY or NVSHF More Risky?
Grindrod Ltd. has a beta of -0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 135.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novus Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRDLY or NVSHF?
Grindrod Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Novus Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 23.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Grindrod Ltd. pays 51.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Novus Holdings Ltd. pays out 49.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRDLY or NVSHF?
Grindrod Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Novus Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Novus Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Grindrod Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while Novus Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindrod Ltd. is 2.52x versus 0.18x for Novus Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.2.52x 9.65x -- -- NVSHFNovus Holdings Ltd.0.18x 3.19x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GRDLY or RNRTY?
Reunert Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Grindrod Ltd.'s net margin of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.92% beat Reunert Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.-- -- $642.6M RNRTYReunert Ltd.-- -- $470.2M -
What do Analysts Say About GRDLY or RNRTY?
Grindrod Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Reunert Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grindrod Ltd. has higher upside potential than Reunert Ltd., analysts believe Grindrod Ltd. is more attractive than Reunert Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.0 0 0 RNRTYReunert Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GRDLY or RNRTY More Risky?
Grindrod Ltd. has a beta of -0.358, which suggesting that the stock is 135.791% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reunert Ltd. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.535%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GRDLY or RNRTY?
Grindrod Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Reunert Ltd. offers a yield of 5.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Grindrod Ltd. pays 51.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Reunert Ltd. pays out 34.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GRDLY or RNRTY?
Grindrod Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reunert Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Grindrod Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Reunert Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Grindrod Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.65x while Reunert Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grindrod Ltd. is 2.52x versus 0.77x for Reunert Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.2.52x 9.65x -- -- RNRTYReunert Ltd.0.77x 11.47x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
