Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
12
BLLQF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.30
Seasonality move
:
16.32%
Day range:
$1.30 - $1.30
52-week range:
$1.30 - $1.30
Dividend yield:
6.76%
P/E ratio:
7.51x
P/S ratio:
0.23x
P/B ratio:
0.42x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$124.3M
Revenue:
$638M
EPS (TTM):
$0.20
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
$1.30 | -- | $124.3M | 7.51x | $0.09 | 6.76% | 0.23x |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
$28.69 | -- | $4.9B | 14.59x | $0.51 | 3.58% | 0.70x |
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
$10.15 | -- | $680.4M | 9.65x | $0.31 | 2.21% | 2.52x |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.03 | -- | $10.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.03x |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.13 | -- | $41.2M | 3.19x | $0.03 | 23.77% | 0.18x |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
$7.09 | -- | $557M | 11.47x | $0.10 | 5.5% | 0.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
23% | -0.104 | -- | 0.62x |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
49.3% | 0.576 | -- | 0.63x |
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
18.26% | 2.489 | -- | 2.04x |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
42% | 0.000 | 577.54% | 0.79x |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
15.12% | 0.198 | -- | 1.54x |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
11.64% | 0.063 | -- | 1.65x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BLLQF
Bell Equipment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.71% | 14.24% | -- | -- |
|
BDVSY
The Bidvest Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 9.33% | 17.42% | -- | -- |
|
GRDLY
Grindrod Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.22% | 3.92% | -- | -- |
|
MURSF
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -4.63% | -8.2% | -- | -- |
|
NVSHF
Novus Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.51% | 14.93% | -- | -$3.9M |
|
RNRTY
Reunert Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.02% | 11.56% | -- | -- |
Bell Equipment Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BLLQF or BDVSY?
The Bidvest Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.24% beat The Bidvest Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 17.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.-- -- $379.4M BDVSYThe Bidvest Group Ltd.-- -- $4B -
What do Analysts Say About BLLQF or BDVSY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Bidvest Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bell Equipment Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Bidvest Group Ltd., analysts believe Bell Equipment Ltd. is more attractive than The Bidvest Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0 0 0 BDVSYThe Bidvest Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BLLQF or BDVSY More Risky?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Bidvest Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.698, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.248%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLLQF or BDVSY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. The Bidvest Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Bell Equipment Ltd. pays 34.74% of its earnings as a dividend. The Bidvest Group Ltd. pays out 40.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLLQF or BDVSY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Bidvest Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Bidvest Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bell Equipment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.51x while The Bidvest Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bell Equipment Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.70x for The Bidvest Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0.23x 7.51x -- -- BDVSYThe Bidvest Group Ltd.0.70x 14.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLLQF or GRDLY?
Grindrod Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.24% beat Grindrod Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.-- -- $379.4M GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.-- -- $642.6M -
What do Analysts Say About BLLQF or GRDLY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Grindrod Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bell Equipment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Grindrod Ltd., analysts believe Bell Equipment Ltd. is more attractive than Grindrod Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0 0 0 GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BLLQF or GRDLY More Risky?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Grindrod Ltd. has a beta of -0.358, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.791%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLLQF or GRDLY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Grindrod Ltd. offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Bell Equipment Ltd. pays 34.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Grindrod Ltd. pays out 51.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLLQF or GRDLY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Grindrod Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Grindrod Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bell Equipment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.51x while Grindrod Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bell Equipment Ltd. is 0.23x versus 2.52x for Grindrod Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0.23x 7.51x -- -- GRDLYGrindrod Ltd.2.52x 9.65x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLLQF or MURSF?
Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.24% beat Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.-- -- $379.4M MURSFMurray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.-- -- $142.5M -
What do Analysts Say About BLLQF or MURSF?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bell Equipment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Bell Equipment Ltd. is more attractive than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0 0 0 MURSFMurray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BLLQF or MURSF More Risky?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.108, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.194%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLLQF or MURSF?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Bell Equipment Ltd. pays 34.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLLQF or MURSF?
Bell Equipment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bell Equipment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.51x while Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bell Equipment Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.03x for Murray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0.23x 7.51x -- -- MURSFMurray & Roberts Holdings Ltd.0.03x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLLQF or NVSHF?
Novus Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.24% beat Novus Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.-- -- $379.4M NVSHFNovus Holdings Ltd.-- -- $155M -
What do Analysts Say About BLLQF or NVSHF?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Novus Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bell Equipment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Novus Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Bell Equipment Ltd. is more attractive than Novus Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0 0 0 NVSHFNovus Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BLLQF or NVSHF More Risky?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novus Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLLQF or NVSHF?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Novus Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 23.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Bell Equipment Ltd. pays 34.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Novus Holdings Ltd. pays out 49.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLLQF or NVSHF?
Bell Equipment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Novus Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Novus Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bell Equipment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.51x while Novus Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bell Equipment Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.18x for Novus Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0.23x 7.51x -- -- NVSHFNovus Holdings Ltd.0.18x 3.19x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BLLQF or RNRTY?
Reunert Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.24% beat Reunert Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.56%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.-- -- $379.4M RNRTYReunert Ltd.-- -- $470.2M -
What do Analysts Say About BLLQF or RNRTY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Reunert Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bell Equipment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Reunert Ltd., analysts believe Bell Equipment Ltd. is more attractive than Reunert Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0 0 0 RNRTYReunert Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is BLLQF or RNRTY More Risky?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a beta of -0.244, which suggesting that the stock is 124.385% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reunert Ltd. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.535%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BLLQF or RNRTY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.76%. Reunert Ltd. offers a yield of 5.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Bell Equipment Ltd. pays 34.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Reunert Ltd. pays out 34.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BLLQF or RNRTY?
Bell Equipment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Reunert Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bell Equipment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Reunert Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bell Equipment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.51x while Reunert Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bell Equipment Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.77x for Reunert Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BLLQFBell Equipment Ltd.0.23x 7.51x -- -- RNRTYReunert Ltd.0.77x 11.47x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
