GMPUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Industria De Diseno Textil SA has a net margin of 0.75% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of 14.87%. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.26% beat Industria De Diseno Textil SA's return on equity of 32.79%.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Industria De Diseno Textil SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.3%. Given that Industria De Diseno Textil SA has higher upside potential than Gestamp Automocion, analysts believe Industria De Diseno Textil SA is more attractive than Gestamp Automocion.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Industria De Diseno Textil SA has a beta of 1.100, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.018%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Industria De Diseno Textil SA offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Industria De Diseno Textil SA pays out 69.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Industria De Diseno Textil SA quarterly revenues of $10.7B. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $23M is lower than Industria De Diseno Textil SA's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Industria De Diseno Textil SA's PE ratio is 26.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.12x versus 4.00x for Industria De Diseno Textil SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neinor Homes SA has a net margin of 0.75% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of --. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.26% beat Neinor Homes SA's return on equity of 9.94%.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neinor Homes SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gestamp Automocion has higher upside potential than Neinor Homes SA, analysts believe Gestamp Automocion is more attractive than Neinor Homes SA.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neinor Homes SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Neinor Homes SA offers a yield of 13.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Neinor Homes SA pays out 38.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Neinor Homes SA quarterly revenues of --. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $23M is higher than Neinor Homes SA's net income of --. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Neinor Homes SA's PE ratio is 9.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.12x versus 1.50x for Neinor Homes SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melia Hotels International SA has a net margin of 0.75% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of 12.82%. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.26% beat Melia Hotels International SA's return on equity of 21.69%.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melia Hotels International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gestamp Automocion has higher upside potential than Melia Hotels International SA, analysts believe Gestamp Automocion is more attractive than Melia Hotels International SA.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melia Hotels International SA has a beta of 1.304, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.415%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Melia Hotels International SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Melia Hotels International SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gestamp Automocion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Melia Hotels International SA quarterly revenues of $642.4M. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $23M is lower than Melia Hotels International SA's net income of $82.4M. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Melia Hotels International SA's PE ratio is 11.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.12x versus 0.79x for Melia Hotels International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vidrala SA has a net margin of 0.75% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of --. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.26% beat Vidrala SA's return on equity of --.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vidrala SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gestamp Automocion has higher upside potential than Vidrala SA, analysts believe Gestamp Automocion is more attractive than Vidrala SA.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vidrala SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Vidrala SA offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 34.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Vidrala SA pays out 16.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Vidrala SA quarterly revenues of --. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $23M is lower than Vidrala SA's net income of $167.9M. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.97x while Vidrala SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.12x versus -- for Vidrala SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.