GCEI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LifeQuest World Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat LifeQuest World Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LifeQuest World Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Clean Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than LifeQuest World Corp., analysts believe Global Clean Energy, Inc. is more attractive than LifeQuest World Corp..

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LifeQuest World Corp. has a beta of 0.087, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.297%.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LifeQuest World Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LifeQuest World Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than LifeQuest World Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$18K is higher than LifeQuest World Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LifeQuest World Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy, Inc. is -- versus 4.53x for LifeQuest World Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enviri Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -3.51%. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Enviri Corp.'s return on equity of -35.35%.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enviri Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $19.17 which suggests that it could grow by 5.72%. Given that Enviri Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Clean Energy, Inc., analysts believe Enviri Corp. is more attractive than Global Clean Energy, Inc..

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviri Corp. has a beta of 1.775, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.482%.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enviri Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enviri Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enviri Corp. quarterly revenues of $575.3M. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$18K is higher than Enviri Corp.'s net income of -$20.2M. Notably, Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enviri Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy, Inc. is -- versus 0.65x for Enviri Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Resource Holding Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net margin of -2.13%. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Quest Resource Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -47.18%.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Resource Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.08 which suggests that it could grow by 60.59%. Given that Quest Resource Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than Global Clean Energy, Inc., analysts believe Quest Resource Holding Corp. is more attractive than Global Clean Energy, Inc..

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Resource Holding Corp. has a beta of 0.165, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.455%.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Resource Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Resource Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quest Resource Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $63.3M. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$18K is higher than Quest Resource Holding Corp.'s net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Resource Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy, Inc. is -- versus 0.15x for Quest Resource Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rain Oncology has a net margin of -- compared to Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net margin of --. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Rain Oncology's return on equity of --.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rain Oncology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global Clean Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rain Oncology, analysts believe Global Clean Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Rain Oncology.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.194% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rain Oncology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rain Oncology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Global Clean Energy, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rain Oncology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global Clean Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are larger than Rain Oncology quarterly revenues of --. Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$18K is higher than Rain Oncology's net income of --. Notably, Global Clean Energy, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rain Oncology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global Clean Energy, Inc. is -- versus -- for Rain Oncology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.