QRHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Ecology has a net margin of -13.59% compared to Quest Resource Holding's net margin of --. Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -23.9% beat Global Ecology's return on equity of --.

Quest Resource Holding has a consensus price target of $6.83, signalling upside risk potential of 182.37%. On the other hand Global Ecology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Global Ecology, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Global Ecology.

Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Ecology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quest Resource Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Ecology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quest Resource Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Ecology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues are $70M, which are larger than Global Ecology quarterly revenues of --. Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$9.5M is higher than Global Ecology's net income of --. Notably, Quest Resource Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Ecology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Resource Holding is 0.17x versus 3.16x for Global Ecology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of -13.59% compared to Quest Resource Holding's net margin of -23.73%. Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -23.9% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -43.18%.

Quest Resource Holding has a consensus price target of $6.83, signalling upside risk potential of 182.37%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 89.47%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services.

Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.178, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.214%.

Quest Resource Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quest Resource Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues are $70M, which are larger than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $14.7M. Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$9.5M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Quest Resource Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Resource Holding is 0.17x versus 2.42x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources has a net margin of -13.59% compared to Quest Resource Holding's net margin of -51.88%. Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -23.9% beat Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources's return on equity of --.

Quest Resource Holding has a consensus price target of $6.83, signalling upside risk potential of 182.37%. On the other hand Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources.

Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources has a beta of -1.094, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 209.375%.

Quest Resource Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quest Resource Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues are $70M, which are larger than Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources quarterly revenues of $888.8K. Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$9.5M is lower than Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources's net income of -$461.1K. Notably, Quest Resource Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Resource Holding is 0.17x versus 0.58x for Strategic Environmental & Energy Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Waste Management has a net margin of -13.59% compared to Quest Resource Holding's net margin of 10.59%. Quest Resource Holding's return on equity of -23.9% beat Waste Management's return on equity of 33.94%.

Quest Resource Holding has a consensus price target of $6.83, signalling upside risk potential of 182.37%. On the other hand Waste Management has an analysts' consensus of $244.67 which suggests that it could grow by 4.95%. Given that Quest Resource Holding has higher upside potential than Waste Management, analysts believe Quest Resource Holding is more attractive than Waste Management.

Quest Resource Holding has a beta of 0.554, which suggesting that the stock is 44.59% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Waste Management has a beta of 0.674, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.562%.

Quest Resource Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Waste Management offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Quest Resource Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management pays out 44.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Waste Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quest Resource Holding quarterly revenues are $70M, which are smaller than Waste Management quarterly revenues of $6B. Quest Resource Holding's net income of -$9.5M is lower than Waste Management's net income of $637M. Notably, Quest Resource Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Waste Management's PE ratio is 35.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quest Resource Holding is 0.17x versus 4.10x for Waste Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.