FUJIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kyocera has a net margin of 8.66% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of 7.38%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.17% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 3.11%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.52%. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.64%. Given that FUJIFILM Holdings has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe FUJIFILM Holdings is more attractive than Kyocera.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.279, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.095%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Kyocera offers a yield of 3.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $470M is higher than Kyocera's net income of $236M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 20.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.02x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nidec has a net margin of 8.66% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of -3.46%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.17% beat Nidec's return on equity of 8.22%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.52%. On the other hand Nidec has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 43.68%. Given that Nidec has higher upside potential than FUJIFILM Holdings, analysts believe Nidec is more attractive than FUJIFILM Holdings.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nidec has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.006%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Nidec offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Nidec pays out 32.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Nidec quarterly revenues of $4B. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $470M is higher than Nidec's net income of -$138.3M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Nidec's PE ratio is 27.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.23x versus 1.23x for Nidec. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 8.66% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of 5.34%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.17% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.52%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 77.13%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than FUJIFILM Holdings, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than FUJIFILM Holdings.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FUJIFILM Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $470M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.23x versus 2.86x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Industries has a net margin of 8.66% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of 10.84%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.17% beat Toyota Industries's return on equity of 4.73%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.52%. On the other hand Toyota Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUJIFILM Holdings has higher upside potential than Toyota Industries, analysts believe FUJIFILM Holdings is more attractive than Toyota Industries.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.409, which suggesting that the stock is 59.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Industries has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.029%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Toyota Industries offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Industries pays out 27.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than Toyota Industries quarterly revenues of $6.6B. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $470M is lower than Toyota Industries's net income of $713.4M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Toyota Industries's PE ratio is 13.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.23x versus 0.87x for Toyota Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.