FSUGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fertoz has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Fertoz's return on equity of -26.41%.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fertoz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Fertoz, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Fertoz.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fertoz has a beta of -0.589, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.878%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.62%. Fertoz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Fertoz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fertoz quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Fertoz's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Fertoz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 1.93x versus 1.18x for Fertoz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Harvest Minerals's return on equity of -45.85%.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harvest Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Harvest Minerals.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.62%. Harvest Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Harvest Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 1.93x versus 4.89x for Harvest Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 47.15%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Fortescue, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Fortescue.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.62%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 1.93x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue's net margin of --. Fortescue's return on equity of 29.95% beat Danakali's return on equity of --.

Fortescue has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe Fortescue is more attractive than Danakali.

Fortescue has a beta of 1.102, which suggesting that the stock is 10.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.426%.

Fortescue has a quarterly dividend of $1.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.62%. Danakali offers a yield of 130.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fortescue pays 72.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fortescue quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, Fortescue's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Danakali's PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue is 1.93x versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.