Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
71
FSUGY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$28.45
Seasonality move
:
2.76%
Day range:
$27.94 - $28.48
52-week range:
$16.41 - $31.70
Dividend yield:
5.74%
P/E ratio:
11.72x
P/S ratio:
2.68x
P/B ratio:
2.06x
Volume:
105.2K
Avg. volume:
61.4K
1-year change:
47.56%
Market cap:
$43.8B
Revenue:
$15.5B
EPS (TTM):
$2.43
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue Ltd.
|
$28.45 | -- | $43.8B | 11.72x | $0.85 | 5.74% | 2.68x |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
$0.0520 | -- | $50.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 121.02x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.44x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
$0.24 | -- | $63.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 148.29x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
$1.33 | -- | $510.8M | 101.84x | $0.03 | 6.1% | 0.23x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
$0.07 | -- | $25.4M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue Ltd.
|
22.06% | 0.021 | -- | 1.89x |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
50.34% | 1.804 | -- | 0.42x |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
9.38% | 0.000 | -- | 1.16x |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | 2.381 | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
44.7% | -2.321 | -- | 1.20x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | 0.532 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FSUGY
Fortescue Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 20.22% | 26.33% | -- | -- |
|
FGPHF
First Graphene Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -53.94% | -81.87% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Canadian Phosphate Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HZRGF
Hazer Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.75% | -1.2% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fortescue Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or FGPHF?
First Graphene Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat First Graphene Ltd.'s return on equity of -81.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B FGPHFFirst Graphene Ltd.-- -- $4.2M -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or FGPHF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Graphene Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than First Graphene Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than First Graphene Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 FGPHFFirst Graphene Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or FGPHF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Graphene Ltd. has a beta of 1.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.02%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or FGPHF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. First Graphene Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 62.67% of its earnings as a dividend. First Graphene Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or FGPHF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Graphene Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than First Graphene Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while First Graphene Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.68x versus 121.02x for First Graphene Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue Ltd.2.68x 11.72x -- -- FGPHFFirst Graphene Ltd.121.02x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or FTZZF?
Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or FTZZF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Canadian Phosphate Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Canadian Phosphate Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or FTZZF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Canadian Phosphate Ltd. has a beta of -0.884, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 188.443%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or FTZZF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 62.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Canadian Phosphate Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or FTZZF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Canadian Phosphate Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Canadian Phosphate Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.68x versus 1.44x for Canadian Phosphate Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue Ltd.2.68x 11.72x -- -- FTZZFCanadian Phosphate Ltd.1.44x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or HZRGF?
Hazer Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Hazer Group Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or HZRGF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hazer Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hazer Group Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Hazer Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or HZRGF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hazer Group Ltd. has a beta of 77.720, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7671.982%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or HZRGF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Hazer Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 62.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Hazer Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or HZRGF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hazer Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hazer Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Hazer Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.68x versus 148.29x for Hazer Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue Ltd.2.68x 11.72x -- -- HZRGFHazer Group Ltd.148.29x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or NUFMF?
Nufarm Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Nufarm Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.2%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B NUFMFNufarm Ltd.-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or NUFMF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nufarm Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Nufarm Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Nufarm Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or NUFMF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm Ltd. has a beta of -0.193, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 119.282%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or NUFMF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Nufarm Ltd. offers a yield of 6.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 62.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm Ltd. pays out 951.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nufarm Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or NUFMF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Nufarm Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Nufarm Ltd.'s PE ratio is 101.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.68x versus 0.23x for Nufarm Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue Ltd.2.68x 11.72x -- -- NUFMFNufarm Ltd.0.23x 101.84x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FSUGY or SBMSF?
Danakali Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Fortescue Ltd.'s net margin of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s return on equity of 26.33% beat Danakali Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FSUGYFortescue Ltd.-- -- $24.6B SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FSUGY or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortescue Ltd. has higher upside potential than Danakali Ltd., analysts believe Fortescue Ltd. is more attractive than Danakali Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FSUGYFortescue Ltd.0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FSUGY or SBMSF More Risky?
Fortescue Ltd. has a beta of 0.944, which suggesting that the stock is 5.605% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali Ltd. has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.432%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSUGY or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.74%. Danakali Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Fortescue Ltd. pays 62.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortescue Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FSUGY or SBMSF?
Fortescue Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Fortescue Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Danakali Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Fortescue Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Danakali Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortescue Ltd. is 2.68x versus -- for Danakali Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FSUGYFortescue Ltd.2.68x 11.72x -- -- SBMSFDanakali Ltd.-- 47.38x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 4
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 4
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
