FMCC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Credit Acceptance Corp. has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Freddie Mac's net margin of 18.58%. Freddie Mac's return on equity of 17.98% beat Credit Acceptance Corp.'s return on equity of 27.54%.

Freddie Mac has a consensus price target of $12.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand Credit Acceptance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $458.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.46%. Given that Freddie Mac has higher upside potential than Credit Acceptance Corp., analysts believe Freddie Mac is more attractive than Credit Acceptance Corp..

Freddie Mac has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Credit Acceptance Corp. has a beta of 1.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.171%.

Freddie Mac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Credit Acceptance Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freddie Mac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Credit Acceptance Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freddie Mac quarterly revenues are $33.6B, which are larger than Credit Acceptance Corp. quarterly revenues of $582.4M. Freddie Mac's net income of $2.8B is higher than Credit Acceptance Corp.'s net income of $108.2M. Notably, Freddie Mac's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,344.11x while Credit Acceptance Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freddie Mac is 0.27x versus 2.47x for Credit Acceptance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Freddie Mac's net margin of 4.48%. Freddie Mac's return on equity of 17.98% beat Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.55%.

Freddie Mac has a consensus price target of $12.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.23%. Given that Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Freddie Mac, analysts believe Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. is more attractive than Freddie Mac.

Freddie Mac has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.069%.

Freddie Mac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freddie Mac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freddie Mac quarterly revenues are $33.6B, which are larger than Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $108.4M. Freddie Mac's net income of $2.8B is higher than Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Freddie Mac's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,344.11x while Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freddie Mac is 0.27x versus 0.49x for Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Federal National Mortgage Association has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Freddie Mac's net margin of 9.55%. Freddie Mac's return on equity of 17.98% beat Federal National Mortgage Association's return on equity of 15.25%.

Freddie Mac has a consensus price target of $12.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand Federal National Mortgage Association has an analysts' consensus of $12.88 which suggests that it could grow by 11.38%. Given that Freddie Mac has higher upside potential than Federal National Mortgage Association, analysts believe Freddie Mac is more attractive than Federal National Mortgage Association.

Freddie Mac has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Federal National Mortgage Association has a beta of 1.711, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.094%.

Freddie Mac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Federal National Mortgage Association offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freddie Mac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Federal National Mortgage Association pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freddie Mac quarterly revenues are $33.6B, which are smaller than Federal National Mortgage Association quarterly revenues of $40.4B. Freddie Mac's net income of $2.8B is lower than Federal National Mortgage Association's net income of $3.9B. Notably, Freddie Mac's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,344.11x while Federal National Mortgage Association's PE ratio is 5,780.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freddie Mac is 0.27x versus 0.43x for Federal National Mortgage Association. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mag Mile Capital, Inc. has a net margin of 8.26% compared to Freddie Mac's net margin of -137.74%. Freddie Mac's return on equity of 17.98% beat Mag Mile Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -5604.01%.

Freddie Mac has a consensus price target of $12.67, signalling upside risk potential of 17.39%. On the other hand Mag Mile Capital, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Freddie Mac has higher upside potential than Mag Mile Capital, Inc., analysts believe Freddie Mac is more attractive than Mag Mile Capital, Inc..

Freddie Mac has a beta of 1.777, which suggesting that the stock is 77.685% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mag Mile Capital, Inc. has a beta of 5.283, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 428.306%.

Freddie Mac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mag Mile Capital, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Freddie Mac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mag Mile Capital, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Freddie Mac quarterly revenues are $33.6B, which are larger than Mag Mile Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues of $324.6K. Freddie Mac's net income of $2.8B is higher than Mag Mile Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$447.1K. Notably, Freddie Mac's price-to-earnings ratio is 3,344.11x while Mag Mile Capital, Inc.'s PE ratio is 817.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Freddie Mac is 0.27x versus 8.84x for Mag Mile Capital, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.