EVSV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BrightView Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net margin of -2.47%. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat BrightView Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.88%.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BrightView Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $16.34 which suggests that it could grow by 18.18%. Given that BrightView Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enviro-Serv, Inc., analysts believe BrightView Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Enviro-Serv, Inc..

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a beta of 1.560, which suggesting that the stock is 55.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BrightView Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.843%.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BrightView Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enviro-Serv, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BrightView Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BrightView Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $614.7M. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than BrightView Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$15.2M. Notably, Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BrightView Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 313.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro-Serv, Inc. is 0.17x versus 0.50x for BrightView Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cass Information Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net margin of 16.54%. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Cass Information Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.07%.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cass Information Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $50.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that Cass Information Systems, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enviro-Serv, Inc., analysts believe Cass Information Systems, Inc. is more attractive than Enviro-Serv, Inc..

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a beta of 1.560, which suggesting that the stock is 55.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cass Information Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.449, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.148%.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cass Information Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Enviro-Serv, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems, Inc. pays out 47.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Cass Information Systems, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cass Information Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $49.5M. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Cass Information Systems, Inc.'s net income of $8.2M. Notably, Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cass Information Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro-Serv, Inc. is 0.17x versus 2.95x for Cass Information Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GFL Environmental, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net margin of 4.31%. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat GFL Environmental, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.25%.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GFL Environmental, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.59 which suggests that it could grow by 27.83%. Given that GFL Environmental, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enviro-Serv, Inc., analysts believe GFL Environmental, Inc. is more attractive than Enviro-Serv, Inc..

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a beta of 1.560, which suggesting that the stock is 55.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GFL Environmental, Inc. has a beta of 0.878, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.152%.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GFL Environmental, Inc. offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Enviro-Serv, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental, Inc. pays out 12.97% of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GFL Environmental, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than GFL Environmental, Inc.'s net income of $52.1M. Notably, Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GFL Environmental, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro-Serv, Inc. is 0.17x versus 3.41x for GFL Environmental, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Water Global, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net margin of --. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s return on equity of -- beat Quest Water Global, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Water Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enviro-Serv, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, Inc., analysts believe Enviro-Serv, Inc. is more attractive than Quest Water Global, Inc..

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a beta of 1.560, which suggesting that the stock is 55.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Water Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.473%.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Water Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enviro-Serv, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Water Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enviro-Serv, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quest Water Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Quest Water Global, Inc.'s net income of -$198.2K. Notably, Enviro-Serv, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Water Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enviro-Serv, Inc. is 0.17x versus -- for Quest Water Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.