ETTYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cloetta AB has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Essity AB's net margin of 5.92%. Essity AB's return on equity of 25.52% beat Cloetta AB's return on equity of 8.74%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cloetta AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Essity AB has higher upside potential than Cloetta AB, analysts believe Essity AB is more attractive than Cloetta AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloetta AB has a beta of -0.090, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.013%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Cloetta AB offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Essity AB pays 53.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Cloetta AB pays out 65.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Cloetta AB quarterly revenues of $211.6M. Essity AB's net income of $319.3M is higher than Cloetta AB's net income of $12.5M. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Cloetta AB's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.34x versus 0.85x for Cloetta AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Duni AB has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Essity AB's net margin of -0.11%. Essity AB's return on equity of 25.52% beat Duni AB's return on equity of 5.69%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Duni AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Essity AB has higher upside potential than Duni AB, analysts believe Essity AB is more attractive than Duni AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duni AB has a beta of 0.012, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.785%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Duni AB offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Essity AB pays 53.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Duni AB pays out 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Duni AB quarterly revenues of $184.1M. Essity AB's net income of $319.3M is higher than Duni AB's net income of -$192.7K. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Duni AB's PE ratio is 31.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.34x versus 0.97x for Duni AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oatly Group AB has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Essity AB's net margin of -16.62%. Essity AB's return on equity of 25.52% beat Oatly Group AB's return on equity of -122.04%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oatly Group AB has an analysts' consensus of $1.63 which suggests that it could grow by 138.82%. Given that Oatly Group AB has higher upside potential than Essity AB, analysts believe Oatly Group AB is more attractive than Essity AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oatly Group AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Oatly Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Essity AB pays 53.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Oatly Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essity AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Oatly Group AB quarterly revenues of $208M. Essity AB's net income of $319.3M is higher than Oatly Group AB's net income of -$34.6M. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Oatly Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.34x versus 0.50x for Oatly Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zinzino Holding AB has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Essity AB's net margin of 7.98%. Essity AB's return on equity of 25.52% beat Zinzino Holding AB's return on equity of 59.18%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zinzino Holding AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Essity AB has higher upside potential than Zinzino Holding AB, analysts believe Essity AB is more attractive than Zinzino Holding AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.318, which suggesting that the stock is 68.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zinzino Holding AB has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.918%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.81%. Zinzino Holding AB offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Essity AB pays 53.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Zinzino Holding AB pays out 36.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Zinzino Holding AB quarterly revenues of $51.3M. Essity AB's net income of $319.3M is higher than Zinzino Holding AB's net income of $4.1M. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.27x while Zinzino Holding AB's PE ratio is 17.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.34x versus 1.54x for Zinzino Holding AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.