ETTYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cloetta AB has a net margin of 9.7% compared to Essity AB's net margin of 8.68%. Essity AB's return on equity of 14.71% beat Cloetta AB's return on equity of 12.96%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cloetta AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Essity AB has higher upside potential than Cloetta AB, analysts believe Essity AB is more attractive than Cloetta AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloetta AB has a beta of -0.322, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.198%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Cloetta AB offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Essity AB pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Cloetta AB pays out 65.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Cloetta AB quarterly revenues of $228.7M. Essity AB's net income of $352.8M is higher than Cloetta AB's net income of $19.9M. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Cloetta AB's PE ratio is 14.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.36x versus 1.19x for Cloetta AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oatly Group AB has a net margin of 9.7% compared to Essity AB's net margin of -29.36%. Essity AB's return on equity of 14.71% beat Oatly Group AB's return on equity of -195.09%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oatly Group AB has an analysts' consensus of $20.17 which suggests that it could grow by 78.36%. Given that Oatly Group AB has higher upside potential than Essity AB, analysts believe Oatly Group AB is more attractive than Essity AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oatly Group AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Oatly Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Essity AB pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Oatly Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Essity AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Oatly Group AB quarterly revenues of $222.2M. Essity AB's net income of $352.8M is higher than Oatly Group AB's net income of -$65.2M. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Oatly Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.36x versus 0.40x for Oatly Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Swedencare AB has a net margin of 9.7% compared to Essity AB's net margin of 3.11%. Essity AB's return on equity of 14.71% beat Swedencare AB's return on equity of 0.84%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Swedencare AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Essity AB has higher upside potential than Swedencare AB, analysts believe Essity AB is more attractive than Swedencare AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Swedencare AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Swedencare AB offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Essity AB pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Swedencare AB pays out 40.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Swedencare AB quarterly revenues of $74.9M. Essity AB's net income of $352.8M is higher than Swedencare AB's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Swedencare AB's PE ratio is 101.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.36x versus 2.34x for Swedencare AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zinzino AB has a net margin of 9.7% compared to Essity AB's net margin of 12.04%. Essity AB's return on equity of 14.71% beat Zinzino AB's return on equity of 54.49%.

Essity AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zinzino AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Essity AB has higher upside potential than Zinzino AB, analysts believe Essity AB is more attractive than Zinzino AB.

Essity AB has a beta of 0.112, which suggesting that the stock is 88.834% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zinzino AB has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.868%.

Essity AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Zinzino AB offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Essity AB pays 47.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Zinzino AB pays out 80.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Essity AB quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Zinzino AB quarterly revenues of $78.1M. Essity AB's net income of $352.8M is higher than Zinzino AB's net income of $9.4M. Notably, Essity AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.56x while Zinzino AB's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Essity AB is 1.36x versus 2.29x for Zinzino AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.