CLOEF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duni AB has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Cloetta AB's net margin of -0.11%. Cloetta AB's return on equity of 8.74% beat Duni AB's return on equity of 5.69%.

Cloetta AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Duni AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cloetta AB has higher upside potential than Duni AB, analysts believe Cloetta AB is more attractive than Duni AB.

Cloetta AB has a beta of -0.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duni AB has a beta of 0.012, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.785%.

Cloetta AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Duni AB offers a yield of 3.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Cloetta AB pays 65.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Duni AB pays out 36.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cloetta AB quarterly revenues are $211.6M, which are larger than Duni AB quarterly revenues of $184.1M. Cloetta AB's net income of $12.5M is higher than Duni AB's net income of -$192.7K. Notably, Cloetta AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while Duni AB's PE ratio is 31.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cloetta AB is 0.85x versus 0.97x for Duni AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Essity AB has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Cloetta AB's net margin of 9.14%. Cloetta AB's return on equity of 8.74% beat Essity AB's return on equity of 25.52%.

Cloetta AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Essity AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cloetta AB has higher upside potential than Essity AB, analysts believe Cloetta AB is more attractive than Essity AB.

Cloetta AB has a beta of -0.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Essity AB has a beta of 0.318, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.184%.

Cloetta AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Essity AB offers a yield of 2.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Cloetta AB pays 65.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Essity AB pays out 53.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cloetta AB quarterly revenues are $211.6M, which are smaller than Essity AB quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Cloetta AB's net income of $12.5M is lower than Essity AB's net income of $319.3M. Notably, Cloetta AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while Essity AB's PE ratio is 9.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cloetta AB is 0.85x versus 1.34x for Essity AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oatly Group AB has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Cloetta AB's net margin of -16.62%. Cloetta AB's return on equity of 8.74% beat Oatly Group AB's return on equity of -122.04%.

Cloetta AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oatly Group AB has an analysts' consensus of $1.63 which suggests that it could grow by 138.82%. Given that Oatly Group AB has higher upside potential than Cloetta AB, analysts believe Oatly Group AB is more attractive than Cloetta AB.

Cloetta AB has a beta of -0.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oatly Group AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cloetta AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Oatly Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cloetta AB pays 65.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Oatly Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloetta AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cloetta AB quarterly revenues are $211.6M, which are larger than Oatly Group AB quarterly revenues of $208M. Cloetta AB's net income of $12.5M is higher than Oatly Group AB's net income of -$34.6M. Notably, Cloetta AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while Oatly Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cloetta AB is 0.85x versus 0.50x for Oatly Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zinzino Holding AB has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Cloetta AB's net margin of 7.98%. Cloetta AB's return on equity of 8.74% beat Zinzino Holding AB's return on equity of 59.18%.

Cloetta AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Zinzino Holding AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cloetta AB has higher upside potential than Zinzino Holding AB, analysts believe Cloetta AB is more attractive than Zinzino Holding AB.

Cloetta AB has a beta of -0.090, which suggesting that the stock is 109.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zinzino Holding AB has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.918%.

Cloetta AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Zinzino Holding AB offers a yield of 3.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Cloetta AB pays 65.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Zinzino Holding AB pays out 36.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cloetta AB quarterly revenues are $211.6M, which are larger than Zinzino Holding AB quarterly revenues of $51.3M. Cloetta AB's net income of $12.5M is higher than Zinzino Holding AB's net income of $4.1M. Notably, Cloetta AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.85x while Zinzino Holding AB's PE ratio is 17.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cloetta AB is 0.85x versus 1.54x for Zinzino Holding AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.