ESVIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenfire Resources Ltd. has a net margin of -0.74% compared to Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -6.41%. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.45% beat Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s return on equity of 16.13%.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Greenfire Resources Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $5.71 which suggests that it could grow by 18.32%. Given that Greenfire Resources Ltd. has higher upside potential than Ensign Energy Services, Inc., analysts believe Greenfire Resources Ltd. is more attractive than Ensign Energy Services, Inc..

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.702% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenfire Resources Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenfire Resources Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ensign Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenfire Resources Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Greenfire Resources Ltd. quarterly revenues of $99.2M. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$2.2M is higher than Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.63x while Greenfire Resources Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ensign Energy Services, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.87x for Greenfire Resources Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a net margin of -0.74% compared to Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -13.37%. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.45% beat Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s return on equity of -21.72%.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.14 which suggests that it could grow by 56.43%. Given that Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ensign Energy Services, Inc., analysts believe Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. is more attractive than Ensign Energy Services, Inc..

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.702% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. has a beta of 0.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.178%.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ensign Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $149.3M. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$2.2M is higher than Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s net income of -$20M. Notably, Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.63x while Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 44.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ensign Energy Services, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.24x for Gran Tierra Energy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a net margin of -0.74% compared to Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of --. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.45% beat HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HTC Purenergy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than HTC Purenergy, Inc., analysts believe Ensign Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than HTC Purenergy, Inc..

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.702% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a beta of -0.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.849%.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HTC Purenergy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ensign Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HTC Purenergy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than HTC Purenergy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$2.2M is lower than HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s net income of -$88.1K. Notably, Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.63x while HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ensign Energy Services, Inc. is 0.28x versus 0.86x for HTC Purenergy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of -0.74% compared to Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net margin of -48.93%. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -3.45% beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Ensign Energy Services, Inc. is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.702% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.987%.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ensign Energy Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ensign Energy Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $298.5M, which are larger than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s net income of -$2.2M is lower than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Ensign Energy Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.63x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ensign Energy Services, Inc. is 0.28x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.