ERIXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Neonode has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net margin of -129.71%. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of -1.2% beat Neonode's return on equity of -62.37%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neonode has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.81%. Given that Neonode has higher upside potential than Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson, analysts believe Neonode is more attractive than Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neonode has a beta of 1.963, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.314%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. Neonode offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays -34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Neonode pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Neonode quarterly revenues of $838K. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $367.5M is higher than Neonode's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Neonode's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is 1.16x versus 31.08x for Neonode. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wyld Networks AB has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net margin of -351.35%. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of -1.2% beat Wyld Networks AB's return on equity of -783.29%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wyld Networks AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has higher upside potential than Wyld Networks AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is more attractive than Wyld Networks AB.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wyld Networks AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. Wyld Networks AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays -34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Wyld Networks AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than Wyld Networks AB quarterly revenues of $277.1K. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $367.5M is higher than Wyld Networks AB's net income of -$973.7K. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wyld Networks AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is 1.16x versus -- for Wyld Networks AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XMReality AB has a net margin of 6.17% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net margin of --. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's return on equity of -1.2% beat XMReality AB's return on equity of --.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XMReality AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has higher upside potential than XMReality AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is more attractive than XMReality AB.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a beta of 0.674, which suggesting that the stock is 32.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XMReality AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.19%. XMReality AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson pays -34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. XMReality AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson quarterly revenues are $6B, which are larger than XMReality AB quarterly revenues of --. Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net income of $367.5M is higher than XMReality AB's net income of --. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XMReality AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is 1.16x versus 0.18x for XMReality AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.