ERIXF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dustin Group AB has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net margin of 0.06%. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's return on equity of 27.82% beat Dustin Group AB's return on equity of -41.83%.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dustin Group AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has higher upside potential than Dustin Group AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is more attractive than Dustin Group AB.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dustin Group AB has a beta of -0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.443%.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dustin Group AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson pays 47500% of its earnings as a dividend. Dustin Group AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Dustin Group AB quarterly revenues of $527.8M. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net income of $1.2B is higher than Dustin Group AB's net income of $313.2K. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.12x while Dustin Group AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is 1.37x versus 0.07x for Dustin Group AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neonode, Inc. has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net margin of -331.22%. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's return on equity of 27.82% beat Neonode, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.02%.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neonode, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 157.51%. Given that Neonode, Inc. has higher upside potential than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, analysts believe Neonode, Inc. is more attractive than Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neonode, Inc. has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.484%.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Neonode, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson pays 47500% of its earnings as a dividend. Neonode, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Neonode, Inc. quarterly revenues of $430K. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net income of $1.2B is higher than Neonode, Inc.'s net income of $13.9M. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.12x while Neonode, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is 1.37x versus 17.80x for Neonode, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smart Eye AB has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net margin of -30.94%. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's return on equity of 27.82% beat Smart Eye AB's return on equity of -12.47%.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smart Eye AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has higher upside potential than Smart Eye AB, analysts believe Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is more attractive than Smart Eye AB.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a beta of 0.668, which suggesting that the stock is 33.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smart Eye AB has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smart Eye AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson pays 47500% of its earnings as a dividend. Smart Eye AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Smart Eye AB quarterly revenues of $10.4M. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's net income of $1.2B is higher than Smart Eye AB's net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.12x while Smart Eye AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson is 1.37x versus 7.37x for Smart Eye AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.