ERAO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Caduceus Software Systems Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy Resource Abundance's net margin of --. Energy Resource Abundance's return on equity of -- beat Caduceus Software Systems Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Energy Resource Abundance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Caduceus Software Systems Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Energy Resource Abundance has higher upside potential than Caduceus Software Systems Corp., analysts believe Energy Resource Abundance is more attractive than Caduceus Software Systems Corp..

Energy Resource Abundance has a beta of 28.003, which suggesting that the stock is 2700.303% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Caduceus Software Systems Corp. has a beta of 0.304, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.634%.

Energy Resource Abundance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Caduceus Software Systems Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Resource Abundance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Caduceus Software Systems Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Resource Abundance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Caduceus Software Systems Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Energy Resource Abundance's net income of -- is lower than Caduceus Software Systems Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Energy Resource Abundance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Caduceus Software Systems Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Resource Abundance is -- versus 0.59x for Caduceus Software Systems Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshpet, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy Resource Abundance's net margin of 35.2%. Energy Resource Abundance's return on equity of -- beat Freshpet, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

Energy Resource Abundance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Freshpet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $70.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Freshpet, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energy Resource Abundance, analysts believe Freshpet, Inc. is more attractive than Energy Resource Abundance.

Energy Resource Abundance has a beta of 28.003, which suggesting that the stock is 2700.303% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshpet, Inc. has a beta of 1.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.919%.

Energy Resource Abundance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshpet, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Resource Abundance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshpet, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Resource Abundance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Freshpet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $288.8M. Energy Resource Abundance's net income of -- is lower than Freshpet, Inc.'s net income of $101.7M. Notably, Energy Resource Abundance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Freshpet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Resource Abundance is -- versus 2.95x for Freshpet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Marzetti Co. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy Resource Abundance's net margin of 9.54%. Energy Resource Abundance's return on equity of -- beat The Marzetti Co.'s return on equity of 17.15%.

Energy Resource Abundance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Marzetti Co. has an analysts' consensus of $197.20 which suggests that it could grow by 19.78%. Given that The Marzetti Co. has higher upside potential than Energy Resource Abundance, analysts believe The Marzetti Co. is more attractive than Energy Resource Abundance.

Energy Resource Abundance has a beta of 28.003, which suggesting that the stock is 2700.303% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Marzetti Co. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.04%.

Energy Resource Abundance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Marzetti Co. offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Energy Resource Abundance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Marzetti Co. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. The Marzetti Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Energy Resource Abundance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Marzetti Co. quarterly revenues of $493.5M. Energy Resource Abundance's net income of -- is lower than The Marzetti Co.'s net income of $47.1M. Notably, Energy Resource Abundance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Marzetti Co.'s PE ratio is 26.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Resource Abundance is -- versus 2.34x for The Marzetti Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Energy Resource Abundance's net margin of -480.68%. Energy Resource Abundance's return on equity of -- beat Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Energy Resource Abundance has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2621.09%. Given that Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Energy Resource Abundance, analysts believe Splash Beverage Group, Inc. is more attractive than Energy Resource Abundance.

Energy Resource Abundance has a beta of 28.003, which suggesting that the stock is 2700.303% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Splash Beverage Group, Inc. has a beta of -1.354, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 235.4%.

Energy Resource Abundance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Energy Resource Abundance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Splash Beverage Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Energy Resource Abundance quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Splash Beverage Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Energy Resource Abundance's net income of -- is lower than Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s net income of -$9.9M. Notably, Energy Resource Abundance's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Splash Beverage Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Energy Resource Abundance is -- versus 2.65x for Splash Beverage Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.