CENT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Energy Resource Abundance has a net margin of -1.54% compared to Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net margin of --. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s return on equity of 10.52% beat Energy Resource Abundance's return on equity of --.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a consensus price target of $42.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.22%. On the other hand Energy Resource Abundance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Garden & Pet Co. has higher upside potential than Energy Resource Abundance, analysts believe Central Garden & Pet Co. is more attractive than Energy Resource Abundance.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Energy Resource Abundance has a beta of 28.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2700.303%.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Energy Resource Abundance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Central Garden & Pet Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Energy Resource Abundance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Central Garden & Pet Co. quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are larger than Energy Resource Abundance quarterly revenues of --. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net income of -$10.4M is higher than Energy Resource Abundance's net income of --. Notably, Central Garden & Pet Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Energy Resource Abundance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet Co. is 0.68x versus -- for Energy Resource Abundance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flowers Foods, Inc. has a net margin of -1.54% compared to Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net margin of 3.22%. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s return on equity of 10.52% beat Flowers Foods, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.7%.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a consensus price target of $42.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.22%. On the other hand Flowers Foods, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.71 which suggests that it could grow by 19.05%. Given that Central Garden & Pet Co. has higher upside potential than Flowers Foods, Inc., analysts believe Central Garden & Pet Co. is more attractive than Flowers Foods, Inc..

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowers Foods, Inc. has a beta of 0.328, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.245%.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flowers Foods, Inc. offers a yield of 9.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Central Garden & Pet Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowers Foods, Inc. pays out 81.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowers Foods, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Garden & Pet Co. quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are smaller than Flowers Foods, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than Flowers Foods, Inc.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Central Garden & Pet Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Flowers Foods, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet Co. is 0.68x versus 0.44x for Flowers Foods, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshpet, Inc. has a net margin of -1.54% compared to Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net margin of 35.2%. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s return on equity of 10.52% beat Freshpet, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.48%.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a consensus price target of $42.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.22%. On the other hand Freshpet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $70.67 which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Central Garden & Pet Co. has higher upside potential than Freshpet, Inc., analysts believe Central Garden & Pet Co. is more attractive than Freshpet, Inc..

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshpet, Inc. has a beta of 1.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.919%.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshpet, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Central Garden & Pet Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshpet, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Central Garden & Pet Co. quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are larger than Freshpet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $288.8M. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than Freshpet, Inc.'s net income of $101.7M. Notably, Central Garden & Pet Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while Freshpet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 27.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet Co. is 0.68x versus 2.95x for Freshpet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Marzetti Co. has a net margin of -1.54% compared to Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net margin of 9.54%. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s return on equity of 10.52% beat The Marzetti Co.'s return on equity of 17.15%.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a consensus price target of $42.33, signalling upside risk potential of 26.22%. On the other hand The Marzetti Co. has an analysts' consensus of $197.20 which suggests that it could grow by 19.78%. Given that Central Garden & Pet Co. has higher upside potential than The Marzetti Co., analysts believe Central Garden & Pet Co. is more attractive than The Marzetti Co..

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.567% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Marzetti Co. has a beta of 0.420, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.04%.

Central Garden & Pet Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Marzetti Co. offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Central Garden & Pet Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Marzetti Co. pays out 61.77% of its earnings as a dividend. The Marzetti Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Garden & Pet Co. quarterly revenues are $678.2M, which are larger than The Marzetti Co. quarterly revenues of $493.5M. Central Garden & Pet Co.'s net income of -$10.4M is lower than The Marzetti Co.'s net income of $47.1M. Notably, Central Garden & Pet Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.14x while The Marzetti Co.'s PE ratio is 26.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet Co. is 0.68x versus 2.34x for The Marzetti Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.