EMRAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duke Energy has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 15.71%. Emera's return on equity of 5.69% beat Duke Energy's return on equity of 8.52%.

Emera has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Duke Energy has an analysts' consensus of $123.48 which suggests that it could grow by 16.08%. Given that Duke Energy has higher upside potential than Emera, analysts believe Duke Energy is more attractive than Emera.

Emera has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duke Energy has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.021%.

Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. Duke Energy offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Duke Energy pays out 114.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Emera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Duke Energy's is not.

Emera quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Duke Energy quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Emera's net income of $16.1M is lower than Duke Energy's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.61x while Duke Energy's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 1.94x versus 2.72x for Duke Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First National Energy has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of --. Emera's return on equity of 5.69% beat First National Energy's return on equity of --.

Emera has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First National Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Emera has higher upside potential than First National Energy, analysts believe Emera is more attractive than First National Energy.

Emera has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First National Energy has a beta of -6.778, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 777.84%.

Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. First National Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. First National Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emera quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than First National Energy quarterly revenues of --. Emera's net income of $16.1M is higher than First National Energy's net income of --. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.61x while First National Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 1.94x versus -- for First National Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NRG Energy has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of -10.62%. Emera's return on equity of 5.69% beat NRG Energy's return on equity of 30.38%.

Emera has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NRG Energy has an analysts' consensus of $97.11 which suggests that it could fall by -0.08%. Given that NRG Energy has higher upside potential than Emera, analysts believe NRG Energy is more attractive than Emera.

Emera has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NRG Energy has a beta of 1.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.724%.

Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. NRG Energy offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. NRG Energy pays out -188.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Emera's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emera quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than NRG Energy quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Emera's net income of $16.1M is higher than NRG Energy's net income of -$767M. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.61x while NRG Energy's PE ratio is 25.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 1.94x versus 0.75x for NRG Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NorthWestern Energy Group has a net margin of 1.22% compared to Emera's net margin of 13.56%. Emera's return on equity of 5.69% beat NorthWestern Energy Group's return on equity of 8.12%.

Emera has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NorthWestern Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of $58.13 which suggests that it could grow by 11.99%. Given that NorthWestern Energy Group has higher upside potential than Emera, analysts believe NorthWestern Energy Group is more attractive than Emera.

Emera has a beta of 0.523, which suggesting that the stock is 47.668% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NorthWestern Energy Group has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.05%.

Emera has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.66%. NorthWestern Energy Group offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Emera pays 53.07% of its earnings as a dividend. NorthWestern Energy Group pays out 79.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Emera quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than NorthWestern Energy Group quarterly revenues of $345.2M. Emera's net income of $16.1M is lower than NorthWestern Energy Group's net income of $46.8M. Notably, Emera's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.61x while NorthWestern Energy Group's PE ratio is 13.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Emera is 1.94x versus 2.12x for NorthWestern Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.