DLICY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 29.97%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.78% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.47%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.75%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.372, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.756%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.81%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.05x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.40x versus 2.71x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 29.16%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.78% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 9.14%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $12.90 which suggests that it could grow by 2.91%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.621%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.81%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $11B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.05x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.40x versus 3.28x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 4.23% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net margin of 17.65%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's return on equity of 10.78% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 9.66%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $7.16 which suggests that it could grow by 27.16%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.777, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.284%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.81%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 33.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings quarterly revenues are $18.7B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings's net income of $790.2M is higher than Nomura Holdings's net income of $472M. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.05x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 7.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings is 0.40x versus 1.54x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.