DLICY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.49% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.08%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.96% beat Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.46%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could fall by -4.74%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc..

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.181, which suggesting that the stock is 81.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.340, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.962%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. pays 22.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. pays out 32.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.2B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B is lower than Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $2.7B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 1.65x for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has a net margin of 6.49% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 24.1%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.96% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.19%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.18 which suggests that it could fall by -6.75%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc..

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.181, which suggesting that the stock is 81.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.337, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.345%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 2.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. pays 22.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. pays out 33.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s net income of $5.3B. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 2.31x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 6.49% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.25%. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.96% beat Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.64%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $7.58 which suggests that it could fall by -3.07%. Given that Nomura Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Nomura Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc..

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.181, which suggesting that the stock is 81.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.499%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nomura Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 5.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. pays 22.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings, Inc. pays out 53.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Nomura Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B is higher than Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $649.6M. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Nomura Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus 0.78x for Nomura Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has a net margin of 6.49% compared to Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of --. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.96% beat Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s return on equity of 1.9%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ribbon Acquisition Corp., analysts believe Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Ribbon Acquisition Corp..

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.181, which suggesting that the stock is 81.874% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ribbon Acquisition Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ribbon Acquisition Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. pays 22.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Ribbon Acquisition Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $17.4B, which are larger than Ribbon Acquisition Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.1B is higher than Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s net income of $400. Notably, Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.65x while Ribbon Acquisition Corp.'s PE ratio is 17,241.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dai-ichi Life Holdings, Inc. is 0.43x versus -- for Ribbon Acquisition Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.