CSHX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia) has a net margin of 24.78% compared to Cashmere Valley Bank's net margin of 14.05%. Cashmere Valley Bank's return on equity of 12.06% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia)'s return on equity of 1.31%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cashmere Valley Bank has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia), analysts believe Cashmere Valley Bank is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia).

Cashmere Valley Bank has a beta of 0.270, which suggesting that the stock is 73.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia) has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.177%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cashmere Valley Bank pays 23.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cashmere Valley Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cashmere Valley Bank quarterly revenues are $31.3M, which are smaller than Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia) quarterly revenues of $39.9M. Cashmere Valley Bank's net income of $7.8M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia)'s net income of $5.6M. Notably, Cashmere Valley Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia)'s PE ratio is 106.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cashmere Valley Bank is 2.21x versus 2.48x for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (Virginia). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 24.78% compared to Cashmere Valley Bank's net margin of 23.62%. Cashmere Valley Bank's return on equity of 12.06% beat OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.8%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.77%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cashmere Valley Bank, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Cashmere Valley Bank.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a beta of 0.270, which suggesting that the stock is 73.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.287, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.332%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cashmere Valley Bank pays 23.49% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cashmere Valley Bank's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cashmere Valley Bank quarterly revenues are $31.3M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Cashmere Valley Bank's net income of $7.8M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $4.3M. Notably, Cashmere Valley Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cashmere Valley Bank is 2.21x versus 0.91x for OptimumBank Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National Corp. has a net margin of 24.78% compared to Cashmere Valley Bank's net margin of 27.82%. Cashmere Valley Bank's return on equity of 12.06% beat Park National Corp.'s return on equity of 13.78%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $180.33 which suggests that it could grow by 13.37%. Given that Park National Corp. has higher upside potential than Cashmere Valley Bank, analysts believe Park National Corp. is more attractive than Cashmere Valley Bank.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a beta of 0.270, which suggesting that the stock is 73.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National Corp. has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.635%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Park National Corp. offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.32 per share. Cashmere Valley Bank pays 23.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National Corp. pays out 45.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cashmere Valley Bank quarterly revenues are $31.3M, which are smaller than Park National Corp. quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Cashmere Valley Bank's net income of $7.8M is lower than Park National Corp.'s net income of $47.2M. Notably, Cashmere Valley Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while Park National Corp.'s PE ratio is 14.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cashmere Valley Bank is 2.21x versus 3.91x for Park National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial Corp. has a net margin of 24.78% compared to Cashmere Valley Bank's net margin of 19.46%. Cashmere Valley Bank's return on equity of 12.06% beat Tompkins Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 11.34%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tompkins Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $77.00 which suggests that it could grow by 6.12%. Given that Tompkins Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than Cashmere Valley Bank, analysts believe Tompkins Financial Corp. is more attractive than Cashmere Valley Bank.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a beta of 0.270, which suggesting that the stock is 73.043% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.709%.

Cashmere Valley Bank has a quarterly dividend of $0.95 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Tompkins Financial Corp. offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Cashmere Valley Bank pays 23.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial Corp. pays out 49.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cashmere Valley Bank quarterly revenues are $31.3M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $121.7M. Cashmere Valley Bank's net income of $7.8M is lower than Tompkins Financial Corp.'s net income of $23.7M. Notably, Cashmere Valley Bank's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.04x while Tompkins Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 12.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cashmere Valley Bank is 2.21x versus 2.23x for Tompkins Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.