CSASF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mizuho Financial Group has a net margin of 14.36% compared to Credit Saison's net margin of 29.31%. Credit Saison's return on equity of 11.19% beat Mizuho Financial Group's return on equity of 8.01%.

Credit Saison has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mizuho Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4.75%. Given that Mizuho Financial Group has higher upside potential than Credit Saison, analysts believe Mizuho Financial Group is more attractive than Credit Saison.

Credit Saison has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mizuho Financial Group has a beta of 0.435, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.469%.

Credit Saison has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Mizuho Financial Group offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Credit Saison pays 15% of its earnings as a dividend. Mizuho Financial Group pays out 34.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credit Saison quarterly revenues are $741.5M, which are smaller than Mizuho Financial Group quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Credit Saison's net income of $106.5M is lower than Mizuho Financial Group's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Credit Saison's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.61x while Mizuho Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Saison is 1.10x versus 2.77x for Mizuho Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a net margin of 14.36% compared to Credit Saison's net margin of 38.98%. Credit Saison's return on equity of 11.19% beat Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's return on equity of 8.71%.

Credit Saison has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9.4%. Given that Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher upside potential than Credit Saison, analysts believe Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is more attractive than Credit Saison.

Credit Saison has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.074%.

Credit Saison has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Credit Saison pays 15% of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credit Saison quarterly revenues are $741.5M, which are smaller than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group quarterly revenues of $12.1B. Credit Saison's net income of $106.5M is lower than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's net income of $4.7B. Notably, Credit Saison's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.61x while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group's PE ratio is 11.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Saison is 1.10x versus 3.20x for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomura Holdings has a net margin of 14.36% compared to Credit Saison's net margin of 22.58%. Credit Saison's return on equity of 11.19% beat Nomura Holdings's return on equity of 7.95%.

Credit Saison has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomura Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.20 which suggests that it could grow by 6.79%. Given that Nomura Holdings has higher upside potential than Credit Saison, analysts believe Nomura Holdings is more attractive than Credit Saison.

Credit Saison has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomura Holdings has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.97%.

Credit Saison has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Nomura Holdings offers a yield of 4.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Credit Saison pays 15% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomura Holdings pays out 36.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credit Saison quarterly revenues are $741.5M, which are smaller than Nomura Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Credit Saison's net income of $106.5M is lower than Nomura Holdings's net income of $662.4M. Notably, Credit Saison's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.61x while Nomura Holdings's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Saison is 1.10x versus 1.72x for Nomura Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a net margin of 14.36% compared to Credit Saison's net margin of 31.35%. Credit Saison's return on equity of 11.19% beat Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's return on equity of 7.64%.

Credit Saison has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.69%. Given that Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has higher upside potential than Credit Saison, analysts believe Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group is more attractive than Credit Saison.

Credit Saison has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.617%.

Credit Saison has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Credit Saison pays 15% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group pays out 36.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Credit Saison quarterly revenues are $741.5M, which are smaller than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Credit Saison's net income of $106.5M is lower than Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Credit Saison's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.61x while Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Credit Saison is 1.10x versus 3.13x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.