Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Buy
56
CPWIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.44
Seasonality move
:
1.33%
Day range:
$0.44 - $0.44
52-week range:
$0.44 - $0.44
Dividend yield:
5.18%
P/E ratio:
11.56x
P/S ratio:
0.75x
P/B ratio:
0.72x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$5.4B
Revenue:
$7.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPWIF
China Power International Development Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPWIF
China Power International Development Ltd.
|
$0.44 | -- | $5.4B | 11.56x | $0.02 | 5.18% | 0.75x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.59x | $0.01 | 5.95% | 0.57x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
$36.15 | -- | $12.5B | 7.39x | $0.68 | 5.54% | 0.91x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
$7.01 | -- | $14.9B | 18.91x | $0.10 | 5.16% | 142.43x |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
$0.0021 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.53x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.09 | -- | $147.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.78x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPWIF
China Power International Development Ltd.
|
77.8% | 0.163 | -- | 0.54x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
79.58% | 0.187 | -- | 0.65x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
63.41% | 0.208 | -- | 0.52x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
2.8% | -0.263 | -- | 0.68x |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
217.69% | -14.998 | -- | 0.47x |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
16.77% | -0.070 | -- | 2.80x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPWIF
China Power International Development Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.39% | 3.84% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.2% | 14.22% | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.05% | 13.16% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.78% | 7% | -- | -- |
|
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -19.25% | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -7.98% | -8.62% | -- | -- |
China Power International Development Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CPWIF or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Power International Development Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.-- -- $41.1B CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CPWIF or CGEGF?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Power International Development Ltd. has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Power International Development Ltd. is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPWIF or CGEGF More Risky?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -2.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 334.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPWIF or CGEGF?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Power International Development Ltd. pays 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPWIF or CGEGF?
China Power International Development Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Power International Development Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Power International Development Ltd. is 0.75x versus 0.57x for CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0.75x 11.56x -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.0.57x 4.59x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CPWIF or CRPJY?
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Power International Development Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.-- -- $41.1B CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.-- -- $40B -
What do Analysts Say About CPWIF or CRPJY?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Power International Development Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Power International Development Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0 0 0 CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPWIF or CRPJY More Risky?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.36%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPWIF or CRPJY?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. China Power International Development Ltd. pays 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 36.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPWIF or CRPJY?
China Power International Development Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Power International Development Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Power International Development Ltd. is 0.75x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0.75x 11.56x -- -- CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.0.91x 7.39x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CPWIF or HGKGY?
Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Power International Development Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.-- -- $41.1B HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CPWIF or HGKGY?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Power International Development Ltd. has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Power International Development Ltd. is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0 0 0 HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPWIF or HGKGY More Risky?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPWIF or HGKGY?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. China Power International Development Ltd. pays 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 86.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPWIF or HGKGY?
China Power International Development Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Power International Development Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Power International Development Ltd. is 0.75x versus 142.43x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0.75x 11.56x -- -- HGKGYPower Assets Holdings Ltd.142.43x 18.91x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CPWIF or SHUNF?
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Power International Development Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.-- -- $41.1B SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.-- -- $214.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CPWIF or SHUNF?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Power International Development Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe China Power International Development Ltd. is more attractive than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0 0 0 SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPWIF or SHUNF More Risky?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.051, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.877%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPWIF or SHUNF?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Power International Development Ltd. pays 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Power International Development Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPWIF or SHUNF?
China Power International Development Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Power International Development Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Power International Development Ltd. is 0.75x versus 0.53x for Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0.75x 11.56x -- -- SHUNFShunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.0.53x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CPWIF or SMTLF?
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Power International Development Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.84% beat GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.-- -- $41.1B SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.-- -- $708.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CPWIF or SMTLF?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Power International Development Ltd. has higher upside potential than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Power International Development Ltd. is more attractive than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0 0 0 SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPWIF or SMTLF More Risky?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.555% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.471%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPWIF or SMTLF?
China Power International Development Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.18%. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Power International Development Ltd. pays 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Power International Development Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPWIF or SMTLF?
China Power International Development Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Power International Development Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Power International Development Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.56x while GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Power International Development Ltd. is 0.75x versus 0.78x for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPWIFChina Power International Development Ltd.0.75x 11.56x -- -- SMTLFGCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.0.78x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 24
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 4.87% over the past day.
Buy
85
HUT alert for Dec 24
Hut 8 Corp. [HUT] is up 1.49% over the past day.
Buy
63
GPCR alert for Dec 24
Structure Therapeutics, Inc. [GPCR] is down 1.53% over the past day.
