Financhill
Buy
57

CLPHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$9.06
Seasonality move :
1.16%
Day range:
$9.02 - $9.33
52-week range:
$7.74 - $9.33
Dividend yield:
4.4%
P/E ratio:
15.83x
P/S ratio:
2.01x
P/B ratio:
1.55x
Volume:
20.9K
Avg. volume:
67.1K
1-year change:
11.27%
Market cap:
$23.2B
Revenue:
$11.7B
EPS (TTM):
$0.58

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
CLPHY
CLP Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
CLPHY
CLP Holdings Ltd.
$9.18 -- $23.2B 15.83x $0.08 4.4% 2.01x
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
$0.24 -- $1B 4.59x $0.01 5.95% 0.57x
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
$36.15 -- $12.5B 7.39x $0.68 5.54% 0.91x
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
$7.17 -- $15.3B 19.34x $0.10 5.05% 145.68x
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
$0.0021 -- $10.7M -- $0.00 0% 0.53x
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
$0.09 -- $147.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.78x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
CLPHY
CLP Holdings Ltd.
37.36% -0.053 -- 0.51x
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
79.58% 0.187 -- 0.65x
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
63.41% 0.208 -- 0.52x
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
2.8% -0.263 -- 0.68x
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
217.69% -14.998 -- 0.47x
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
16.77% -0.070 -- 2.80x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
CLPHY
CLP Holdings Ltd.
-- -- 6.55% 10.26% -- --
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
-- -- 3.2% 14.22% -- --
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
-- -- 5.05% 13.16% -- --
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
-- -- 6.78% 7% -- --
SHUNF
Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
-- -- -19.25% -- -- --
SMTLF
GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -7.98% -8.62% -- --

CLP Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or CGEGF?

    CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $23.1B
    CGEGF
    CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
    -- -- $8.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or CGEGF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe CLP Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    CGEGF
    CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is CLPHY or CGEGF More Risky?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 57.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of -2.348, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 334.77%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or CGEGF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. CLP Holdings Ltd. pays 62.2% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 24.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or CGEGF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 4.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings Ltd. is 2.01x versus 0.57x for CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    2.01x 15.83x -- --
    CGEGF
    CGN New Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.
    0.57x 4.59x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or CRPJY?

    China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $23.1B
    CRPJY
    China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
    -- -- $40B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or CRPJY?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd., analysts believe CLP Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    CRPJY
    China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is CLPHY or CRPJY More Risky?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 57.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.36%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or CRPJY?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. CLP Holdings Ltd. pays 62.2% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. pays out 36.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or CRPJY?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings Ltd. is 2.01x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    2.01x 15.83x -- --
    CRPJY
    China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd.
    0.91x 7.39x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or HGKGY?

    Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $23.1B
    HGKGY
    Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $11.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or HGKGY?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings Ltd., analysts believe CLP Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    HGKGY
    Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is CLPHY or HGKGY More Risky?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 57.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.321, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.899%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or HGKGY?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CLP Holdings Ltd. pays 62.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings Ltd. pays out 86.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or HGKGY?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while Power Assets Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 19.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings Ltd. is 2.01x versus 145.68x for Power Assets Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    2.01x 15.83x -- --
    HGKGY
    Power Assets Holdings Ltd.
    145.68x 19.34x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or SHUNF?

    Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $23.1B
    SHUNF
    Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
    -- -- $214.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or SHUNF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd., analysts believe CLP Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    SHUNF
    Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is CLPHY or SHUNF More Risky?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 57.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. has a beta of 0.051, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.877%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or SHUNF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLP Holdings Ltd. pays 62.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or SHUNF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings Ltd. is 2.01x versus 0.53x for Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    2.01x 15.83x -- --
    SHUNF
    Shunfeng International Clean Energy Ltd.
    0.53x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or SMTLF?

    GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 10.26% beat GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $23.1B
    SMTLF
    GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $708.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or SMTLF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd., analysts believe CLP Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    SMTLF
    GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is CLPHY or SMTLF More Risky?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 57.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.471%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or SMTLF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.4%. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLP Holdings Ltd. pays 62.2% of its earnings as a dividend. GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or SMTLF?

    CLP Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.83x while GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings Ltd. is 2.01x versus 0.78x for GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    CLPHY
    CLP Holdings Ltd.
    2.01x 15.83x -- --
    SMTLF
    GCL New Energy Holdings Ltd.
    0.78x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?

Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…

Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?

Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…

Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?

Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…

Stock Ideas

Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x

Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 25

Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 14.03% over the past day.

Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 25

Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is up 13.41% over the past day.

Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 25

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is up 5.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock