Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
45
CLPHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.20
Seasonality move
:
1.92%
Day range:
$7.89 - $8.53
52-week range:
$7.57 - $9.54
Dividend yield:
4.84%
P/E ratio:
21.44x
P/S ratio:
1.84x
P/B ratio:
1.51x
Volume:
420.2K
Avg. volume:
217.7K
1-year change:
3.67%
Market cap:
$20.7B
Revenue:
$11.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.38
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
$8.20 | -- | $20.7B | 21.44x | $0.08 | 4.84% | 1.84x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
$0.24 | -- | $1B | 4.12x | $0.02 | 6.39% | 0.54x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
$37.50 | -- | $12.5B | 6.89x | $0.88 | 5.35% | 0.91x |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
$0.05 | -- | $400.3M | 3.05x | $0.00 | 8.96% | 1.11x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
$6.66 | -- | $14.2B | 18.33x | $0.10 | 5.42% | 102.33x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
36.51% | 0.490 | 36.71% | 0.50x |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
78.4% | 0.078 | 486.61% | 0.77x |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
64.43% | -0.762 | 189.55% | 0.59x |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
67.89% | 0.718 | 345.95% | 0.96x |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
3.2% | -0.234 | 3.24% | 0.47x |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLPHY
CLP Holdings
|
-- | -- | 4.42% | 6.75% | -- | -- |
|
CGEGF
CGN New Energy Holdings
|
-- | -- | 3.37% | 14.93% | -- | -- |
|
CRPJY
China Resources Power Holdings
|
-- | -- | 5.09% | 13.24% | -- | -- |
|
CWPWF
Concord New Energy Group
|
-- | -- | 3.91% | 11.41% | -- | -- |
|
HGKGY
Power Assets Holdings
|
-- | -- | 6.66% | 6.89% | -- | -- |
|
PVLTF
Beijing Energy International Holding
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
CLP Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or CGEGF?
CGN New Energy Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings's net margin of --. CLP Holdings's return on equity of 6.75% beat CGN New Energy Holdings's return on equity of 14.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLPHYCLP Holdings-- -- $22.4B CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings-- -- $7.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or CGEGF?
CLP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CGN New Energy Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings has higher upside potential than CGN New Energy Holdings, analysts believe CLP Holdings is more attractive than CGN New Energy Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLPHYCLP Holdings0 0 0 CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CLPHY or CGEGF More Risky?
CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.530, which suggesting that the stock is 46.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CGN New Energy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or CGEGF?
CLP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.84%. CGN New Energy Holdings offers a yield of 6.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. CLP Holdings pays 115.28% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings pays out 14.58% of its earnings as a dividend. CGN New Energy Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CLP Holdings's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or CGEGF?
CLP Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CGN New Energy Holdings quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings's net income of -- is lower than CGN New Energy Holdings's net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while CGN New Energy Holdings's PE ratio is 4.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings is 1.84x versus 0.54x for CGN New Energy Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLPHYCLP Holdings1.84x 21.44x -- -- CGEGFCGN New Energy Holdings0.54x 4.12x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or CRPJY?
China Resources Power Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings's net margin of --. CLP Holdings's return on equity of 6.75% beat China Resources Power Holdings's return on equity of 13.24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLPHYCLP Holdings-- -- $22.4B CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings-- -- $37.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or CRPJY?
CLP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Power Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings has higher upside potential than China Resources Power Holdings, analysts believe CLP Holdings is more attractive than China Resources Power Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLPHYCLP Holdings0 0 0 CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CLPHY or CRPJY More Risky?
CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.530, which suggesting that the stock is 46.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Power Holdings has a beta of 0.502, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.812%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or CRPJY?
CLP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.84%. China Resources Power Holdings offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. CLP Holdings pays 115.28% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings pays out 29.88% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Power Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CLP Holdings's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or CRPJY?
CLP Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Power Holdings quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Power Holdings's net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while China Resources Power Holdings's PE ratio is 6.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings is 1.84x versus 0.91x for China Resources Power Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLPHYCLP Holdings1.84x 21.44x -- -- CRPJYChina Resources Power Holdings0.91x 6.89x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or CWPWF?
Concord New Energy Group has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings's net margin of --. CLP Holdings's return on equity of 6.75% beat Concord New Energy Group's return on equity of 11.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLPHYCLP Holdings-- -- $22.4B CWPWFConcord New Energy Group-- -- $3.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or CWPWF?
CLP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Concord New Energy Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings has higher upside potential than Concord New Energy Group, analysts believe CLP Holdings is more attractive than Concord New Energy Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLPHYCLP Holdings0 0 0 CWPWFConcord New Energy Group0 0 0 -
Is CLPHY or CWPWF More Risky?
CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.530, which suggesting that the stock is 46.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Concord New Energy Group has a beta of 0.345, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.496%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or CWPWF?
CLP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.84%. Concord New Energy Group offers a yield of 8.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLP Holdings pays 115.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group pays out 28.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Concord New Energy Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CLP Holdings's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or CWPWF?
CLP Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Concord New Energy Group quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Concord New Energy Group's net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while Concord New Energy Group's PE ratio is 3.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings is 1.84x versus 1.11x for Concord New Energy Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLPHYCLP Holdings1.84x 21.44x -- -- CWPWFConcord New Energy Group1.11x 3.05x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or HGKGY?
Power Assets Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings's net margin of --. CLP Holdings's return on equity of 6.75% beat Power Assets Holdings's return on equity of 6.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLPHYCLP Holdings-- -- $22.4B HGKGYPower Assets Holdings-- -- $11.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or HGKGY?
CLP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Power Assets Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings has higher upside potential than Power Assets Holdings, analysts believe CLP Holdings is more attractive than Power Assets Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLPHYCLP Holdings0 0 0 HGKGYPower Assets Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CLPHY or HGKGY More Risky?
CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.530, which suggesting that the stock is 46.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Assets Holdings has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.363%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or HGKGY?
CLP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.84%. Power Assets Holdings offers a yield of 5.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CLP Holdings pays 115.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Power Assets Holdings pays out 100.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or HGKGY?
CLP Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Power Assets Holdings quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Power Assets Holdings's net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while Power Assets Holdings's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings is 1.84x versus 102.33x for Power Assets Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLPHYCLP Holdings1.84x 21.44x -- -- HGKGYPower Assets Holdings102.33x 18.33x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLPHY or PVLTF?
Beijing Energy International Holding has a net margin of -- compared to CLP Holdings's net margin of --. CLP Holdings's return on equity of 6.75% beat Beijing Energy International Holding's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLPHYCLP Holdings-- -- $22.4B PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CLPHY or PVLTF?
CLP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Beijing Energy International Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLP Holdings has higher upside potential than Beijing Energy International Holding, analysts believe CLP Holdings is more attractive than Beijing Energy International Holding.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLPHYCLP Holdings0 0 0 PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding0 0 0 -
Is CLPHY or PVLTF More Risky?
CLP Holdings has a beta of 0.530, which suggesting that the stock is 46.991% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beijing Energy International Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLPHY or PVLTF?
CLP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.84%. Beijing Energy International Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLP Holdings pays 115.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Beijing Energy International Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLPHY or PVLTF?
CLP Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Beijing Energy International Holding quarterly revenues of --. CLP Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Beijing Energy International Holding's net income of --. Notably, CLP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.44x while Beijing Energy International Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLP Holdings is 1.84x versus -- for Beijing Energy International Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLPHYCLP Holdings1.84x 21.44x -- -- PVLTFBeijing Energy International Holding-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
