Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Sell
30
CLIHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.80
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$1.80 - $1.80
52-week range:
$1.80 - $1.80
Dividend yield:
2.9%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
3.79x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$716.6M
Revenue:
$194.1M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIHF
CLS Holdings Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
$422.4M | -- | -3.34% | -- | $9.63 |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIHF
CLS Holdings Plc
|
$1.80 | -- | $716.6M | -- | $0.02 | 2.9% | 3.79x |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
$1.13 | -- | $169.4M | 8.63x | $0.01 | 2.74% | 0.78x |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
$2.07 | -- | $671.1M | 10.20x | $0.01 | 1.06% | 2.82x |
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
$7.28 | $9.63 | $2.4B | 5.22x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.38x |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
$0.62 | -- | $49.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 11.42x |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
$12.00 | -- | $1.6B | 24.53x | $0.10 | 2.4% | 0.54x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIHF
CLS Holdings Plc
|
55.14% | -0.010 | -- | 0.31x |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
12.8% | -4.326 | -- | 0.96x |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
19.18% | -0.203 | -- | 1.32x |
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
103.61% | -1.455 | 158.21% | 1.27x |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
54.8% | -0.151 | 56.37% | 0.07x |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
32.54% | -0.462 | -- | 1.17x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CLIHF
CLS Holdings Plc
|
-- | -- | -10.13% | -21.49% | -- | -- |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 10.13% | 11.42% | -- | -- |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 7.55% | 8.75% | -- | -- |
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
$212M | $157.5M | 11.98% | -10278.22% | 34.61% | $163.7M |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
$6.1M | -$9.8M | -5.39% | -10.41% | -497.97% | -$36.9M |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
-- | -- | 4.75% | 7.11% | -- | -- |
CLS Holdings Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIHF or FXTGY?
Foxtons Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to CLS Holdings Plc's net margin of --. CLS Holdings Plc's return on equity of -21.49% beat Foxtons Group Plc's return on equity of 11.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc-- -- $2.4B FXTGYFoxtons Group Plc-- -- $223M -
What do Analysts Say About CLIHF or FXTGY?
CLS Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Foxtons Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLS Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Foxtons Group Plc, analysts believe CLS Holdings Plc is more attractive than Foxtons Group Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc0 0 0 FXTGYFoxtons Group Plc0 0 0 -
Is CLIHF or FXTGY More Risky?
CLS Holdings Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxtons Group Plc has a beta of -0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.412%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIHF or FXTGY?
CLS Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Foxtons Group Plc offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. CLS Holdings Plc pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxtons Group Plc pays out 20.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIHF or FXTGY?
CLS Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Foxtons Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. CLS Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than Foxtons Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, CLS Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Foxtons Group Plc's PE ratio is 8.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLS Holdings Plc is 3.79x versus 0.78x for Foxtons Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc3.79x -- -- -- FXTGYFoxtons Group Plc0.78x 8.63x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIHF or HWGLF?
Harworth Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to CLS Holdings Plc's net margin of --. CLS Holdings Plc's return on equity of -21.49% beat Harworth Group Plc's return on equity of 8.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc-- -- $2.4B HWGLFHarworth Group Plc-- -- $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About CLIHF or HWGLF?
CLS Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Harworth Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLS Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Harworth Group Plc, analysts believe CLS Holdings Plc is more attractive than Harworth Group Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc0 0 0 HWGLFHarworth Group Plc0 0 0 -
Is CLIHF or HWGLF More Risky?
CLS Holdings Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harworth Group Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIHF or HWGLF?
CLS Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Harworth Group Plc offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. CLS Holdings Plc pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Harworth Group Plc pays out 9.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIHF or HWGLF?
CLS Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harworth Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. CLS Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than Harworth Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, CLS Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harworth Group Plc's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLS Holdings Plc is 3.79x versus 2.82x for Harworth Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc3.79x -- -- -- HWGLFHarworth Group Plc2.82x 10.20x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIHF or IHS?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CLS Holdings Plc's net margin of 32.39%. CLS Holdings Plc's return on equity of -21.49% beat IHS Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -10278.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc-- -- $2.4B IHSIHS Holding Ltd.46.58% $0.45 $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CLIHF or IHS?
CLS Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IHS Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $9.63 which suggests that it could grow by 32.21%. Given that IHS Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than CLS Holdings Plc, analysts believe IHS Holding Ltd. is more attractive than CLS Holdings Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc0 0 0 IHSIHS Holding Ltd.4 1 0 -
Is CLIHF or IHS More Risky?
CLS Holdings Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IHS Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIHF or IHS?
CLS Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. IHS Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLS Holdings Plc pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. IHS Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CLS Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIHF or IHS?
CLS Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IHS Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of $455.1M. CLS Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than IHS Holding Ltd.'s net income of $147.4M. Notably, CLS Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IHS Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLS Holdings Plc is 3.79x versus 1.38x for IHS Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc3.79x -- -- -- IHSIHS Holding Ltd.1.38x 5.22x $455.1M $147.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIHF or MRNO?
Murano Global Investments Plc has a net margin of -- compared to CLS Holdings Plc's net margin of -587%. CLS Holdings Plc's return on equity of -21.49% beat Murano Global Investments Plc's return on equity of -10.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc-- -- $2.4B MRNOMurano Global Investments Plc66.02% -$0.69 $810.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CLIHF or MRNO?
CLS Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Murano Global Investments Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLS Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Murano Global Investments Plc, analysts believe CLS Holdings Plc is more attractive than Murano Global Investments Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc0 0 0 MRNOMurano Global Investments Plc0 0 0 -
Is CLIHF or MRNO More Risky?
CLS Holdings Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murano Global Investments Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIHF or MRNO?
CLS Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Murano Global Investments Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CLS Holdings Plc pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Murano Global Investments Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CLS Holdings Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIHF or MRNO?
CLS Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Murano Global Investments Plc quarterly revenues of $9.3M. CLS Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than Murano Global Investments Plc's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, CLS Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Murano Global Investments Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLS Holdings Plc is 3.79x versus 11.42x for Murano Global Investments Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc3.79x -- -- -- MRNOMurano Global Investments Plc11.42x -- $9.3M -$54.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns CLIHF or SVLPF?
Savills Plc has a net margin of -- compared to CLS Holdings Plc's net margin of --. CLS Holdings Plc's return on equity of -21.49% beat Savills Plc's return on equity of 7.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc-- -- $2.4B SVLPFSavills Plc-- -- $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CLIHF or SVLPF?
CLS Holdings Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Savills Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CLS Holdings Plc has higher upside potential than Savills Plc, analysts believe CLS Holdings Plc is more attractive than Savills Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc0 0 0 SVLPFSavills Plc0 0 0 -
Is CLIHF or SVLPF More Risky?
CLS Holdings Plc has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Savills Plc has a beta of 0.323, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.7%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CLIHF or SVLPF?
CLS Holdings Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Savills Plc offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. CLS Holdings Plc pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Savills Plc pays out 76.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CLIHF or SVLPF?
CLS Holdings Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Savills Plc quarterly revenues of --. CLS Holdings Plc's net income of -- is lower than Savills Plc's net income of --. Notably, CLS Holdings Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Savills Plc's PE ratio is 24.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CLS Holdings Plc is 3.79x versus 0.54x for Savills Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CLIHFCLS Holdings Plc3.79x -- -- -- SVLPFSavills Plc0.54x 24.53x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 41.14% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 1.41% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 5.01% over the past day.
