Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
53
IHS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.29
Seasonality move
:
10.45%
Day range:
$7.19 - $7.30
52-week range:
$2.90 - $8.00
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5.22x
P/S ratio:
1.38x
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
395.2K
Avg. volume:
956.5K
1-year change:
145.12%
Market cap:
$2.4B
Revenue:
$1.7B
EPS (TTM):
$1.39
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
$459.8M | -- | -3.34% | -- | $9.63 |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LSLPF
LSL Property Services Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
$7.28 | $9.63 | $2.4B | 5.22x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.38x |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
$1.13 | -- | $169.4M | 8.63x | $0.01 | 2.74% | 0.78x |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
$2.07 | -- | $671.1M | 10.20x | $0.01 | 1.06% | 2.82x |
|
LSLPF
LSL Property Services Plc
|
$3.5500 | -- | $361.3M | 17.77x | $0.05 | 4.24% | 1.66x |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
$0.64 | -- | $50.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 11.42x |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
$12.00 | -- | $1.6B | 24.53x | $0.10 | 2.4% | 0.54x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
103.61% | -1.455 | 158.21% | 1.27x |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
12.8% | -4.326 | -- | 0.96x |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
19.18% | -0.203 | -- | 1.32x |
|
LSLPF
LSL Property Services Plc
|
33.08% | 1.013 | 12% | 1.29x |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
54.8% | -0.151 | 56.37% | 0.07x |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
32.54% | -0.462 | -- | 1.17x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
IHS
IHS Holding Ltd.
|
$212M | $157.5M | 11.98% | -10278.22% | 34.61% | $163.7M |
|
FXTGY
Foxtons Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 10.13% | 11.42% | -- | -- |
|
HWGLF
Harworth Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 7.55% | 8.75% | -- | -- |
|
LSLPF
LSL Property Services Plc
|
-- | -- | 9.34% | 11.77% | -- | -- |
|
MRNO
Murano Global Investments Plc
|
$6.1M | -$9.8M | -5.39% | -10.41% | -497.97% | -$36.9M |
|
SVLPF
Savills Plc
|
-- | -- | 4.75% | 7.11% | -- | -- |
IHS Holding Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns IHS or FXTGY?
Foxtons Group Plc has a net margin of 32.39% compared to IHS Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -10278.22% beat Foxtons Group Plc's return on equity of 11.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IHSIHS Holding Ltd.46.58% $0.45 $3.9B FXTGYFoxtons Group Plc-- -- $223M -
What do Analysts Say About IHS or FXTGY?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $9.63, signalling upside risk potential of 32.21%. On the other hand Foxtons Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Foxtons Group Plc, analysts believe IHS Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Foxtons Group Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IHSIHS Holding Ltd.4 1 0 FXTGYFoxtons Group Plc0 0 0 -
Is IHS or FXTGY More Risky?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Foxtons Group Plc has a beta of -0.424, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.412%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or FXTGY?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Foxtons Group Plc offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. IHS Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Foxtons Group Plc pays out 20.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Foxtons Group Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or FXTGY?
IHS Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $455.1M, which are larger than Foxtons Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s net income of $147.4M is higher than Foxtons Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, IHS Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.22x while Foxtons Group Plc's PE ratio is 8.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding Ltd. is 1.38x versus 0.78x for Foxtons Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IHSIHS Holding Ltd.1.38x 5.22x $455.1M $147.4M FXTGYFoxtons Group Plc0.78x 8.63x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IHS or HWGLF?
Harworth Group Plc has a net margin of 32.39% compared to IHS Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -10278.22% beat Harworth Group Plc's return on equity of 8.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IHSIHS Holding Ltd.46.58% $0.45 $3.9B HWGLFHarworth Group Plc-- -- $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About IHS or HWGLF?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $9.63, signalling upside risk potential of 32.21%. On the other hand Harworth Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Harworth Group Plc, analysts believe IHS Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Harworth Group Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IHSIHS Holding Ltd.4 1 0 HWGLFHarworth Group Plc0 0 0 -
Is IHS or HWGLF More Risky?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harworth Group Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or HWGLF?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harworth Group Plc offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. IHS Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harworth Group Plc pays out 9.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Harworth Group Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or HWGLF?
IHS Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $455.1M, which are larger than Harworth Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s net income of $147.4M is higher than Harworth Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, IHS Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.22x while Harworth Group Plc's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding Ltd. is 1.38x versus 2.82x for Harworth Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IHSIHS Holding Ltd.1.38x 5.22x $455.1M $147.4M HWGLFHarworth Group Plc2.82x 10.20x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IHS or LSLPF?
LSL Property Services Plc has a net margin of 32.39% compared to IHS Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -10278.22% beat LSL Property Services Plc's return on equity of 11.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IHSIHS Holding Ltd.46.58% $0.45 $3.9B LSLPFLSL Property Services Plc-- -- $147.6M -
What do Analysts Say About IHS or LSLPF?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $9.63, signalling upside risk potential of 32.21%. On the other hand LSL Property Services Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than LSL Property Services Plc, analysts believe IHS Holding Ltd. is more attractive than LSL Property Services Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IHSIHS Holding Ltd.4 1 0 LSLPFLSL Property Services Plc0 0 0 -
Is IHS or LSLPF More Risky?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LSL Property Services Plc has a beta of 0.761, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.895%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or LSLPF?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LSL Property Services Plc offers a yield of 4.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. IHS Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LSL Property Services Plc pays out 67.38% of its earnings as a dividend. LSL Property Services Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or LSLPF?
IHS Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $455.1M, which are larger than LSL Property Services Plc quarterly revenues of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s net income of $147.4M is higher than LSL Property Services Plc's net income of --. Notably, IHS Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.22x while LSL Property Services Plc's PE ratio is 17.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding Ltd. is 1.38x versus 1.66x for LSL Property Services Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IHSIHS Holding Ltd.1.38x 5.22x $455.1M $147.4M LSLPFLSL Property Services Plc1.66x 17.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns IHS or MRNO?
Murano Global Investments Plc has a net margin of 32.39% compared to IHS Holding Ltd.'s net margin of -587%. IHS Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -10278.22% beat Murano Global Investments Plc's return on equity of -10.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IHSIHS Holding Ltd.46.58% $0.45 $3.9B MRNOMurano Global Investments Plc66.02% -$0.69 $810.2M -
What do Analysts Say About IHS or MRNO?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $9.63, signalling upside risk potential of 32.21%. On the other hand Murano Global Investments Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Murano Global Investments Plc, analysts believe IHS Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Murano Global Investments Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IHSIHS Holding Ltd.4 1 0 MRNOMurano Global Investments Plc0 0 0 -
Is IHS or MRNO More Risky?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Murano Global Investments Plc has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or MRNO?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Murano Global Investments Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IHS Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Murano Global Investments Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or MRNO?
IHS Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $455.1M, which are larger than Murano Global Investments Plc quarterly revenues of $9.3M. IHS Holding Ltd.'s net income of $147.4M is higher than Murano Global Investments Plc's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, IHS Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.22x while Murano Global Investments Plc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding Ltd. is 1.38x versus 11.42x for Murano Global Investments Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IHSIHS Holding Ltd.1.38x 5.22x $455.1M $147.4M MRNOMurano Global Investments Plc11.42x -- $9.3M -$54.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns IHS or SVLPF?
Savills Plc has a net margin of 32.39% compared to IHS Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -10278.22% beat Savills Plc's return on equity of 7.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital IHSIHS Holding Ltd.46.58% $0.45 $3.9B SVLPFSavills Plc-- -- $1.4B -
What do Analysts Say About IHS or SVLPF?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of $9.63, signalling upside risk potential of 32.21%. On the other hand Savills Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that IHS Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Savills Plc, analysts believe IHS Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Savills Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings IHSIHS Holding Ltd.4 1 0 SVLPFSavills Plc0 0 0 -
Is IHS or SVLPF More Risky?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Savills Plc has a beta of 0.323, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.7%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock IHS or SVLPF?
IHS Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Savills Plc offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. IHS Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Savills Plc pays out 76.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Savills Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios IHS or SVLPF?
IHS Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are $455.1M, which are larger than Savills Plc quarterly revenues of --. IHS Holding Ltd.'s net income of $147.4M is higher than Savills Plc's net income of --. Notably, IHS Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.22x while Savills Plc's PE ratio is 24.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IHS Holding Ltd. is 1.38x versus 0.54x for Savills Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income IHSIHS Holding Ltd.1.38x 5.22x $455.1M $147.4M SVLPFSavills Plc0.54x 24.53x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
