NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Buy
71
CICOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.63
Seasonality move
:
18.85%
Day range:
$1.63 - $1.63
52-week range:
$0.95 - $1.89
Dividend yield:
10.85%
P/E ratio:
4.69x
P/S ratio:
0.87x
P/B ratio:
0.90x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
34.5K
1-year change:
64.65%
Market cap:
$26B
Revenue:
$24.8B
EPS (TTM):
$0.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$58.1M | -- | -10.81% | -- | -- |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$15.9M | -$0.12 | 151.71% | -- | $23.83 |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
$1.63 | -- | $26B | 4.69x | $0.07 | 10.85% | 0.87x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$0.57 | -- | $3.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.57x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$0.80 | -- | $72.1M | 6.67x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.35x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$15.01 | $23.83 | $954M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 20.15x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
$5.23 | -- | $24.3M | 1.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.05x |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
$0.88 | -- | $4.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
14.48% | 0.102 | -- | 1.54x |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
13.47% | -1.332 | 90.03% | 9.89x |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
16.57% | 1.212 | 24.48% | 0.41x |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
19.52% | 0.771 | 2.87% | 2.11x |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
1.33% | -5.715 | 15.23% | 2.08x |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -1.621 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CICOF
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings
|
$4.3B | $3.8B | 13.77% | 9.68% | 40.47% | -$3.7B |
|
ATXG
Addentax Group
|
$328.6K | -$245.1K | -12.26% | -14.46% | -49.38% | $642.1K |
|
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology
|
$7M | -$827.9K | 7.43% | 9.43% | -1.86% | $16.5M |
|
EH
EHang Holdings
|
$11M | -$7.6M | -48.66% | -61.77% | -35.44% | -- |
|
NISN
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group
|
-- | -- | 8.14% | 8.22% | -- | -- |
|
YGMZ
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or ATXG?
Addentax Group has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -53.79%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat Addentax Group's return on equity of -14.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B ATXGAddentax Group24.5% -$0.13 $28.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Addentax Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has higher upside potential than Addentax Group, analysts believe COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is more attractive than Addentax Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 ATXGAddentax Group0 0 0 -
Is CICOF or ATXG More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Addentax Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.85%. Addentax Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Addentax Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or ATXG?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than Addentax Group quarterly revenues of $1.3M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than Addentax Group's net income of -$721.5K. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while Addentax Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.57x for Addentax Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.87x 4.69x $10.3B $3B ATXGAddentax Group0.57x -- $1.3M -$721.5K
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or CBAT?
CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of 0.04%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B CBATCBAK Energy Technology15.58% $0.00 $156.4M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 149.38%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 CBATCBAK Energy Technology0 0 0 -
Is CICOF or CBAT More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.780, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.024%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.85%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or CBAT?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 6.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.35x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.87x 4.69x $10.3B $3B CBATCBAK Energy Technology0.35x 6.67x $44.6M $17.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or EH?
EHang Holdings has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of -37.51%. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B EHEHang Holdings61.2% -$0.10 $132.3M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $23.83 which suggests that it could grow by 61.47%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 EHEHang Holdings2 0 0 -
Is CICOF or EH More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.85%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or EH?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.9M. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.87x versus 20.15x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.87x 4.69x $10.3B $3B EHEHang Holdings20.15x -- $17.9M -$6.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or NISN?
NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group-- -- $211.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1639.96%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than COSCO SHIPPING Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0 0 0 -
Is CICOF or NISN More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.635%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.85%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or NISN?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.87x 4.69x $10.3B $3B NISNNiSun International Enterprise Development Group0.05x 1.25x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CICOF or YGMZ?
MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of 28.9% compared to COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net margin of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's return on equity of 9.68% beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings41.6% $0.19 $40.3B YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CICOF or YGMZ?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0 0 0 YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CICOF or YGMZ More Risky?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a beta of 1.329, which suggesting that the stock is 32.892% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CICOF or YGMZ?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.85%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings pays 129.37% of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CICOF or YGMZ?
COSCO SHIPPING Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.3B, which are larger than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's net income of $3B is higher than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, COSCO SHIPPING Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.69x while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for COSCO SHIPPING Holdings is 0.87x versus -- for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CICOFCOSCO SHIPPING Holdings0.87x 4.69x $10.3B $3B YGMZMingZhu Logistics Holdings-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 2.15% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 6.55% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 5.38% over the past day.
