CGCLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 21.3%. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.81% beat Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 11.6%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd., analysts believe Central Glass Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd..

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 1.380, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.013%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Central Glass Co., Ltd. pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. pays out 27.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net income of $10.2M is lower than Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $947.6M. Notably, Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 17.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass Co., Ltd. is 0.62x versus 3.56x for Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 15.29%. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.81% beat Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.76%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., analysts believe Central Glass Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd..

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.639%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Central Glass Co., Ltd. pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net income of $10.2M is lower than Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.'s net income of $590.3M. Notably, Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass Co., Ltd. is 0.62x versus 0.28x for Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 7.53%. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.81% beat Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 7.11%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd., analysts believe Central Glass Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd..

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.025, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.453%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Central Glass Co., Ltd. pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. pays out 44.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of $367.8M. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net income of $10.2M is lower than Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.'s net income of $27.7M. Notably, Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass Co., Ltd. is 0.62x versus 0.61x for Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taiheiyo Cement Corp. has a net margin of 4.55% compared to Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net margin of 7.88%. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.81% beat Taiheiyo Cement Corp.'s return on equity of 7.95%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Taiheiyo Cement Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Central Glass Co., Ltd. has higher upside potential than Taiheiyo Cement Corp., analysts believe Central Glass Co., Ltd. is more attractive than Taiheiyo Cement Corp..

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiheiyo Cement Corp. has a beta of 0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.678%.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.75%. Taiheiyo Cement Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Central Glass Co., Ltd. pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Taiheiyo Cement Corp. pays out 10.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Glass Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues are $224.2M, which are smaller than Taiheiyo Cement Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s net income of $10.2M is lower than Taiheiyo Cement Corp.'s net income of $121.3M. Notably, Central Glass Co., Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.60x while Taiheiyo Cement Corp.'s PE ratio is 7.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Glass Co., Ltd. is 0.62x versus 0.46x for Taiheiyo Cement Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.