Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
54
CFWFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.01
Seasonality move
:
-5.82%
Day range:
$2.98 - $3.04
52-week range:
$2.11 - $3.06
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
18.26x
P/S ratio:
0.25x
P/B ratio:
0.54x
Volume:
1.3K
Avg. volume:
36.9K
1-year change:
16.03%
Market cap:
$261.1M
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.17
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFWFF
Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
|
$234.5M | -- | -24.46% | -- | -- |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFWFF
Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
|
$3.04 | -- | $261.1M | 18.26x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.25x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
$1.14 | -- | $14.3M | -- | $0.02 | 0% | 0.81x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$9.45 | -- | $19.4M | 40.65x | $0.00 | 0% | 21.47x |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
$0.0005 | -- | $103.5K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.86x |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
$0.0000 | -- | $400 | 0.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.00x |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
$0.0138 | -- | $277.4K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFWFF
Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
|
33.08% | 0.188 | 110.97% | 0.57x |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
2.38% | 0.578 | 1.3% | 0.96x |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
-- | 0.004 | -- | 35.64x |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
-- | -36.127 | -- | -- |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
37.93% | 1.933 | 129.87% | 0.06x |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
-4.01% | -0.072 | 6.04% | 0.01x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFWFF
Calfrac Well Services Ltd.
|
$24.4M | $13.6M | 2.07% | 3.2% | 5.8% | $10.5M |
|
BRN
Barnwell Industries, Inc.
|
-$44K | -$1.8M | -73% | -74.23% | -59.56% | -$980K |
|
CKX
CKX Lands, Inc.
|
$214K | $27.2K | 2.54% | 2.54% | 11.69% | $242.3K |
|
HTPRF
HTC Purenergy, Inc.
|
-$1.3K | -$13.6K | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RHCCF
Royal Helium Ltd.
|
-$130.4K | -$1.7M | -21.62% | -34.33% | -340.41% | -$121K |
|
SPOWF
Strata Power Corp.
|
-- | -$11.6K | -- | -- | -48.57% | -$3.6K |
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CFWFF or BRN?
Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net margin of -81.01%. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.2% beat Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -74.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.10.39% $0.04 $717.3M BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.-1.47% -$0.24 $7.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CFWFF or BRN?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Barnwell Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has higher upside potential than Barnwell Industries, Inc., analysts believe Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is more attractive than Barnwell Industries, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0 0 0 BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CFWFF or BRN More Risky?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Barnwell Industries, Inc. has a beta of -0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFWFF or BRN?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Barnwell Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Calfrac Well Services Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Barnwell Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFWFF or BRN?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $234.8M, which are larger than Barnwell Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3M. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net income of $3.1M is higher than Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while Barnwell Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is 0.25x versus 0.81x for Barnwell Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0.25x 18.26x $234.8M $3.1M BRNBarnwell Industries, Inc.0.81x -- $3M -$2.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CFWFF or CKX?
CKX Lands, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net margin of 71.5%. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.2% beat CKX Lands, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.10.39% $0.04 $717.3M CKXCKX Lands, Inc.92% $0.08 $18.9M -
What do Analysts Say About CFWFF or CKX?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, Inc., analysts believe Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is more attractive than CKX Lands, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0 0 0 CKXCKX Lands, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CFWFF or CKX More Risky?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands, Inc. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.592%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFWFF or CKX?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CKX Lands, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calfrac Well Services Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFWFF or CKX?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $234.8M, which are larger than CKX Lands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $232.6K. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net income of $3.1M is higher than CKX Lands, Inc.'s net income of $166.3K. Notably, Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while CKX Lands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 40.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is 0.25x versus 21.47x for CKX Lands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0.25x 18.26x $234.8M $3.1M CKXCKX Lands, Inc.21.47x 40.65x $232.6K $166.3K
-
Which has Higher Returns CFWFF or HTPRF?
HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net margin of --. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.2% beat HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.10.39% $0.04 $717.3M HTPRFHTC Purenergy, Inc.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CFWFF or HTPRF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HTC Purenergy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has higher upside potential than HTC Purenergy, Inc., analysts believe Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is more attractive than HTC Purenergy, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0 0 0 HTPRFHTC Purenergy, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CFWFF or HTPRF More Risky?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HTC Purenergy, Inc. has a beta of -0.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 141.849%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFWFF or HTPRF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HTC Purenergy, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calfrac Well Services Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HTC Purenergy, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFWFF or HTPRF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $234.8M, which are larger than HTC Purenergy, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net income of $3.1M is higher than HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s net income of -$88.1K. Notably, Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while HTC Purenergy, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is 0.25x versus 0.86x for HTC Purenergy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0.25x 18.26x $234.8M $3.1M HTPRFHTC Purenergy, Inc.0.86x -- -- -$88.1K
-
Which has Higher Returns CFWFF or RHCCF?
Royal Helium Ltd. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net margin of -510.34%. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.2% beat Royal Helium Ltd.'s return on equity of -34.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.10.39% $0.04 $717.3M RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.-26.37% -$0.01 $56.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CFWFF or RHCCF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Royal Helium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has higher upside potential than Royal Helium Ltd., analysts believe Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is more attractive than Royal Helium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0 0 0 RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CFWFF or RHCCF More Risky?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Royal Helium Ltd. has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.396%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFWFF or RHCCF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Royal Helium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calfrac Well Services Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Royal Helium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFWFF or RHCCF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $234.8M, which are larger than Royal Helium Ltd. quarterly revenues of $494.4K. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net income of $3.1M is higher than Royal Helium Ltd.'s net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while Royal Helium Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is 0.25x versus 0.00x for Royal Helium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0.25x 18.26x $234.8M $3.1M RHCCFRoyal Helium Ltd.0.00x 0.00x $494.4K -$2.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CFWFF or SPOWF?
Strata Power Corp. has a net margin of 1.33% compared to Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net margin of -48.93%. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.2% beat Strata Power Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.10.39% $0.04 $717.3M SPOWFStrata Power Corp.-- $0.00 -$241.7K -
What do Analysts Say About CFWFF or SPOWF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strata Power Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has higher upside potential than Strata Power Corp., analysts believe Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is more attractive than Strata Power Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0 0 0 SPOWFStrata Power Corp.0 0 0 -
Is CFWFF or SPOWF More Risky?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a beta of 0.255, which suggesting that the stock is 74.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strata Power Corp. has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.987%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFWFF or SPOWF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Strata Power Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Calfrac Well Services Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Strata Power Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFWFF or SPOWF?
Calfrac Well Services Ltd. quarterly revenues are $234.8M, which are larger than Strata Power Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s net income of $3.1M is higher than Strata Power Corp.'s net income of $6.3K. Notably, Calfrac Well Services Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 18.26x while Strata Power Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Calfrac Well Services Ltd. is 0.25x versus -- for Strata Power Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFWFFCalfrac Well Services Ltd.0.25x 18.26x $234.8M $3.1M SPOWFStrata Power Corp.-- -- -- $6.3K
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
80
TVTX alert for Dec 26
Travere Therapeutics, Inc. [TVTX] is up 0.37% over the past day.
Buy
68
KOD alert for Dec 26
Kodiak Sciences, Inc. [KOD] is down 4.54% over the past day.
Buy
64
ZCSH alert for Dec 23
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 0% over the past day.
