Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…
Sell
30
CFTLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.68
Seasonality move
:
-1.78%
Day range:
$0.68 - $0.68
52-week range:
$0.64 - $0.84
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
22.65x
P/S ratio:
0.74x
P/B ratio:
16.09x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
50
1-year change:
-12.52%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFTLF
Chinasoft International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings Ltd.
|
$20.1B | $87.92 | 5499.1% | -46.53% | $2,510.69 |
|
JFU
9F, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNTMF
SenseTime Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSYHF
TravelSky Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.
|
$18.1B | $0.03 | 23.3% | -91.56% | $723.78 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFTLF
Chinasoft International Ltd.
|
$0.68 | -- | $1.7B | 22.65x | $0.01 | 0% | 0.74x |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings Ltd.
|
$46.48 | $2,510.69 | $9.3B | 81.34x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.33x |
|
JFU
9F, Inc.
|
$4.51 | -- | $53.1M | 2.51x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.92x |
|
SNTMF
SenseTime Group, Inc.
|
$0.32 | -- | $12.4B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 18.63x |
|
TSYHF
TravelSky Technology Ltd.
|
$1.38 | -- | $4B | 12.90x | $0.03 | 2.41% | 3.38x |
|
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.
|
$13.54 | $723.78 | $3.6B | 430.26x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.76x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFTLF
Chinasoft International Ltd.
|
24.06% | -0.868 | -- | 2.93x |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings Ltd.
|
63.78% | 1.424 | 87.06% | 2.38x |
|
JFU
9F, Inc.
|
-- | 1.653 | -- | 5.48x |
|
SNTMF
SenseTime Group, Inc.
|
20.15% | -3.107 | -- | 3.39x |
|
TSYHF
TravelSky Technology Ltd.
|
5.12% | -0.330 | -- | 2.99x |
|
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.
|
82.27% | 1.879 | 123.28% | 0.61x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CFTLF
Chinasoft International Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 4.29% | 5.61% | -- | -- |
|
GDS
GDS Holdings Ltd.
|
$80.9M | $50.6M | 1.73% | 4.95% | 12.55% | -$95.5M |
|
JFU
9F, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 0.22% | 0.22% | -- | -- |
|
SNTMF
SenseTime Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -15.12% | -18.53% | -- | -- |
|
TSYHF
TravelSky Technology Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 9% | 9.47% | -- | -- |
|
VNET
VNET Group, Inc.
|
$75.3M | $27M | -1.61% | -6.45% | 7.48% | -$201.8M |
Chinasoft International Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CFTLF or GDS?
GDS Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net margin of 25.24%. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.61% beat GDS Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 4.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.-- -- $2.1B GDSGDS Holdings Ltd.20.07% $0.40 $10.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CFTLF or GDS?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GDS Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $2,510.69 which suggests that it could grow by 5301.65%. Given that GDS Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Chinasoft International Ltd., analysts believe GDS Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Chinasoft International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0 0 0 GDSGDS Holdings Ltd.14 0 0 -
Is CFTLF or GDS More Risky?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GDS Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.368, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.202%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFTLF or GDS?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GDS Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chinasoft International Ltd. pays 24.57% of its earnings as a dividend. GDS Holdings Ltd. pays out 7.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFTLF or GDS?
Chinasoft International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GDS Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $403.4M. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than GDS Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $101.8M. Notably, Chinasoft International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while GDS Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 81.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chinasoft International Ltd. is 0.74x versus 6.33x for GDS Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0.74x 22.65x -- -- GDSGDS Holdings Ltd.6.33x 81.34x $403.4M $101.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns CFTLF or JFU?
9F, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net margin of --. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.61% beat 9F, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.-- -- $2.1B JFU9F, Inc.-- -- $496.2M -
What do Analysts Say About CFTLF or JFU?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand 9F, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3935.66%. Given that 9F, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chinasoft International Ltd., analysts believe 9F, Inc. is more attractive than Chinasoft International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0 0 0 JFU9F, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CFTLF or JFU More Risky?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 9F, Inc. has a beta of 1.252, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.204%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFTLF or JFU?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 9F, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chinasoft International Ltd. pays 24.57% of its earnings as a dividend. 9F, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFTLF or JFU?
Chinasoft International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than 9F, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than 9F, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Chinasoft International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while 9F, Inc.'s PE ratio is 2.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chinasoft International Ltd. is 0.74x versus 0.92x for 9F, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0.74x 22.65x -- -- JFU9F, Inc.0.92x 2.51x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFTLF or SNTMF?
SenseTime Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net margin of --. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.61% beat SenseTime Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.-- -- $2.1B SNTMFSenseTime Group, Inc.-- -- $4B -
What do Analysts Say About CFTLF or SNTMF?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SenseTime Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chinasoft International Ltd. has higher upside potential than SenseTime Group, Inc., analysts believe Chinasoft International Ltd. is more attractive than SenseTime Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0 0 0 SNTMFSenseTime Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CFTLF or SNTMF More Risky?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SenseTime Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFTLF or SNTMF?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SenseTime Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chinasoft International Ltd. pays 24.57% of its earnings as a dividend. SenseTime Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFTLF or SNTMF?
Chinasoft International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SenseTime Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SenseTime Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Chinasoft International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while SenseTime Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chinasoft International Ltd. is 0.74x versus 18.63x for SenseTime Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0.74x 22.65x -- -- SNTMFSenseTime Group, Inc.18.63x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFTLF or TSYHF?
TravelSky Technology Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net margin of --. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.61% beat TravelSky Technology Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.-- -- $2.1B TSYHFTravelSky Technology Ltd.-- -- $3.3B -
What do Analysts Say About CFTLF or TSYHF?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TravelSky Technology Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Chinasoft International Ltd. has higher upside potential than TravelSky Technology Ltd., analysts believe Chinasoft International Ltd. is more attractive than TravelSky Technology Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0 0 0 TSYHFTravelSky Technology Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CFTLF or TSYHF More Risky?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TravelSky Technology Ltd. has a beta of -0.113, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 111.311%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFTLF or TSYHF?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TravelSky Technology Ltd. offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Chinasoft International Ltd. pays 24.57% of its earnings as a dividend. TravelSky Technology Ltd. pays out 33.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFTLF or TSYHF?
Chinasoft International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TravelSky Technology Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than TravelSky Technology Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Chinasoft International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while TravelSky Technology Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chinasoft International Ltd. is 0.74x versus 3.38x for TravelSky Technology Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0.74x 22.65x -- -- TSYHFTravelSky Technology Ltd.3.38x 12.90x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CFTLF or VNET?
VNET Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net margin of -10.66%. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.61% beat VNET Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -6.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.-- -- $2.1B VNETVNET Group, Inc.20.88% -$0.16 $4.8B -
What do Analysts Say About CFTLF or VNET?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VNET Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $723.78 which suggests that it could grow by 5245.53%. Given that VNET Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chinasoft International Ltd., analysts believe VNET Group, Inc. is more attractive than Chinasoft International Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0 0 0 VNETVNET Group, Inc.9 0 1 -
Is CFTLF or VNET More Risky?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.594% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VNET Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.005, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.462%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CFTLF or VNET?
Chinasoft International Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VNET Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Chinasoft International Ltd. pays 24.57% of its earnings as a dividend. VNET Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CFTLF or VNET?
Chinasoft International Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VNET Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $360.7M. Chinasoft International Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than VNET Group, Inc.'s net income of -$38.5M. Notably, Chinasoft International Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 22.65x while VNET Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 430.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chinasoft International Ltd. is 0.74x versus 2.76x for VNET Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CFTLFChinasoft International Ltd.0.74x 22.65x -- -- VNETVNET Group, Inc.2.76x 430.26x $360.7M -$38.5M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12
Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.
Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12
Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.
Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12
Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.
