CFMOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Care Property Invest SA has a net margin of 64.14% compared to Cofinimmo SA's net margin of --. Cofinimmo SA's return on equity of 5.5% beat Care Property Invest SA's return on equity of --.

Cofinimmo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Care Property Invest SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cofinimmo SA has higher upside potential than Care Property Invest SA, analysts believe Cofinimmo SA is more attractive than Care Property Invest SA.

Cofinimmo SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Care Property Invest SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cofinimmo SA has a quarterly dividend of $6.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. Care Property Invest SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cofinimmo SA pays 254.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Care Property Invest SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cofinimmo SA quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are larger than Care Property Invest SA quarterly revenues of --. Cofinimmo SA's net income of $69.7M is higher than Care Property Invest SA's net income of --. Notably, Cofinimmo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.27x while Care Property Invest SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cofinimmo SA is 5.94x versus -- for Care Property Invest SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MONTEA NV has a net margin of 64.14% compared to Cofinimmo SA's net margin of --. Cofinimmo SA's return on equity of 5.5% beat MONTEA NV's return on equity of 11.09%.

Cofinimmo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MONTEA NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cofinimmo SA has higher upside potential than MONTEA NV, analysts believe Cofinimmo SA is more attractive than MONTEA NV.

Cofinimmo SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MONTEA NV has a beta of -0.072, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.178%.

Cofinimmo SA has a quarterly dividend of $6.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. MONTEA NV offers a yield of 5.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.22 per share. Cofinimmo SA pays 254.9% of its earnings as a dividend. MONTEA NV pays out 32.06% of its earnings as a dividend. MONTEA NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cofinimmo SA's is not.

Cofinimmo SA quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are larger than MONTEA NV quarterly revenues of $41M. Cofinimmo SA's net income of $69.7M is higher than MONTEA NV's net income of $65.7M. Notably, Cofinimmo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.27x while MONTEA NV's PE ratio is 9.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cofinimmo SA is 5.94x versus 9.75x for MONTEA NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VGP NV has a net margin of 64.14% compared to Cofinimmo SA's net margin of --. Cofinimmo SA's return on equity of 5.5% beat VGP NV's return on equity of --.

Cofinimmo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VGP NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cofinimmo SA has higher upside potential than VGP NV, analysts believe Cofinimmo SA is more attractive than VGP NV.

Cofinimmo SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VGP NV has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.633%.

Cofinimmo SA has a quarterly dividend of $6.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. VGP NV offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.74 per share. Cofinimmo SA pays 254.9% of its earnings as a dividend. VGP NV pays out 21.97% of its earnings as a dividend. VGP NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cofinimmo SA's is not.

Cofinimmo SA quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are larger than VGP NV quarterly revenues of --. Cofinimmo SA's net income of $69.7M is higher than VGP NV's net income of --. Notably, Cofinimmo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.27x while VGP NV's PE ratio is 8.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cofinimmo SA is 5.94x versus 25.71x for VGP NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Warehouses De Pauw SA has a net margin of 64.14% compared to Cofinimmo SA's net margin of 83.04%. Cofinimmo SA's return on equity of 5.5% beat Warehouses De Pauw SA's return on equity of 7.83%.

Cofinimmo SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Warehouses De Pauw SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cofinimmo SA has higher upside potential than Warehouses De Pauw SA, analysts believe Cofinimmo SA is more attractive than Warehouses De Pauw SA.

Cofinimmo SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Warehouses De Pauw SA has a beta of 0.874, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.578%.

Cofinimmo SA has a quarterly dividend of $6.96 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.42%. Warehouses De Pauw SA offers a yield of 5.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Cofinimmo SA pays 254.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Warehouses De Pauw SA pays out 42.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Warehouses De Pauw SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cofinimmo SA's is not.

Cofinimmo SA quarterly revenues are $108.7M, which are smaller than Warehouses De Pauw SA quarterly revenues of $151.3M. Cofinimmo SA's net income of $69.7M is lower than Warehouses De Pauw SA's net income of $125.6M. Notably, Cofinimmo SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.27x while Warehouses De Pauw SA's PE ratio is 14.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cofinimmo SA is 5.94x versus 10.48x for Warehouses De Pauw SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.